HK ISPs Compare to SA

HK 80.4km²
ZA 1 221 037km²

The coverage required is exponentially lower. Of course prices will be lower.
 
HK 80.4km²
ZA 1 221 037km²

The coverage required is exponentially lower. Of course prices will be lower.

Also population density is much, much, MUCH higher.

For a better comparison, look at the US which is a lot bigger and less densely populated - they're still cheaper.
 
Also population density is much, much, MUCH higher.

Exactly. They only have to wire fibre to one building to serve a thousand people. Less infrastructure is required for more people at faster speeds, therefore it is cheaper.

For a better comparison, look at the US which is a lot bigger and less densely populated - they're still cheaper.

The US hosts the most commonly accessed content in the world, so they don't have to pay for overpriced data from undersea cable providers. A better comparison would be Australia. Their internet is very similar to ours.
 
The US hosts the most commonly accessed content in the world, so they don't have to pay for overpriced data from undersea cable providers. A better comparison would be Australia. Their internet is very similar to ours.

Population Density
Australia: 2.91/km2
South Africa: 42.4/km2

How do you get to the requirements being similar?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X