Heard where? Every report that I've read has the ANCYL distancing themselves from this incident.
And we can believe anything the anc/yl says because?
"No, we are busy fixing the (fill in almost any service delivery issue here) and it will be sorted out." - Lie.
"No, we are fighting corruption down to the deepest levels and will stop it." - Lie.
"No, there is no crime issue in this country." - Lie
"Shabbi is a walking dead man, he won't live long." -Lie
"No, there is nothing wrong with our education system." -Lie
"No, we will not nationalize...." - Why, when it's been proven time and again that they mostly lie, should we NOW suddenly believe otherwise?
"No, we weren't part of the mob/disruptions." -See above.
The list goes on.
90% of what comes from the anc/yl = lies. (There's no disputing this, is there?) What makes this so different?
I'm just curious, because you and a few others on this forum always need "proof" for whatever situation arises, always trying to "argue" technical points, when all you need is a little common sense -and recent history - to draw your own conclusions. Those "conclusions" are right, more often than not. (Although, one should generally never do this without proper proof, but I think the anc/yl is a different scenario altogether.) You guys may not support this circus per se, but it sure comes across as if you do. I've read quite a bit of the points raised and this is always the first thing I think, y'know what I mean? Why should we now suddenly believe anything we're told by the same people who keep lying about virtually everything? The first 100 times, yeah, maybe...but one lie after the other? Surely you must reach a point where you go, "Ok, maybe they're not telling the truth."
I don't know, this whole country is slowly but surely turning into one big mess. It's really sad.
