foozball3000
Executive Member
Update so far.. not good. Not good at all. This is a headache.
The larger companies are truly insane. Granted I still have a few more to hear back from.
Where as the UK Company I've spoken to actually understood and addressed the needs and risks of what we're trying to do. This is a Lean Startup test run after all.
The SA Companies completely ignored all of that and basically said "you tell us what to do, we do it on our own leisure time, and your money. If it works or not". Their estimates of what can be one with their teams have also been much longer than single developers. (I've been phoning up Software and Mobile Devs that I know to help with that, they're not for hire)
So from a Risk side..
Dealing with a company is typically more expensive, but they give more flexibility and greatly helps with some of the uncertainties and risks. This is mainly because their structure can handle more unexpected things, and have the physical resources to smooth out issues easier than what a freelancer can. (Same as what the UK company said). They usually also add their expertise, because the client doesn't know what's best, they're not a techie. (So far none of the SA ones have done that either)
What this then also says, is that there's no difference in terms of risk between that and just outright hiring a very seasoned Freelance Senior Dev, plus a helping hand or two.
From the quotes so far, the math is: I can hire 4 separate teams to each build the same app, in case any of them are useless and the code is a disaster. Choose the best one to put live, and still have enough money left to do it all again. Or just trust the one corporate company to do it once on their own leisure time. (Without any extras)
The larger companies are truly insane. Granted I still have a few more to hear back from.
Where as the UK Company I've spoken to actually understood and addressed the needs and risks of what we're trying to do. This is a Lean Startup test run after all.
The SA Companies completely ignored all of that and basically said "you tell us what to do, we do it on our own leisure time, and your money. If it works or not". Their estimates of what can be one with their teams have also been much longer than single developers. (I've been phoning up Software and Mobile Devs that I know to help with that, they're not for hire)
So from a Risk side..
Dealing with a company is typically more expensive, but they give more flexibility and greatly helps with some of the uncertainties and risks. This is mainly because their structure can handle more unexpected things, and have the physical resources to smooth out issues easier than what a freelancer can. (Same as what the UK company said). They usually also add their expertise, because the client doesn't know what's best, they're not a techie. (So far none of the SA ones have done that either)
What this then also says, is that there's no difference in terms of risk between that and just outright hiring a very seasoned Freelance Senior Dev, plus a helping hand or two.
From the quotes so far, the math is: I can hire 4 separate teams to each build the same app, in case any of them are useless and the code is a disaster. Choose the best one to put live, and still have enough money left to do it all again. Or just trust the one corporate company to do it once on their own leisure time. (Without any extras)