- Joined
- Jun 28, 2017
- Messages
- 7,139
- Reaction score
- 930
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
OK, correct me if I'm wrong, but running an isolated channel for each station does nothing to prevent eavesdropping... that and plain old access point spoofing.
The major point for WPA encryption is to prevent eavesdropping.
That said, they operate public hotspots, so use at own risk. It's time for WiFi hardware vendors to come up with new standards - like private encryption keys that can be forwarded to individual users via SMS or an app.
OK, correct me if I'm wrong, but running an isolated channel for each station does nothing to prevent eavesdropping... that and plain old access point spoofing.
The major point for WPA encryption is to prevent eavesdropping.
That said, they operate public hotspots, so use at own risk. It's time for WiFi hardware vendors to come up with new standards - like private encryption keys that can be forwarded to individual users via SMS or an app.
Well with that rubberstamp,it's almost an invitation to prove them wrong.You're spot on.
Grant Marais is either clueless about RF or he's intentionally misleading people.
Here's another hilarious statement
“The density of our network is such that we don’t have to run fast roaming,” said Marais
But whats more worrying than Grants ignorance is the Sensepost rubberstamp!
It's client isolation and not an isolated channel. It means that each connection to the access point is isolated and cannot connect to (or eavesdrop) any other client connected to the access point.