-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Will you be subscribing to the new Disney+ R49 streaming package?
Huge packet-loss lately(pls read).
- Thread starter markos
- Start date
tried many sites with different downloads.....Mercury
Well-Known Member
----83.138.189.100 PING Statistics----
66 packets transmitted, 66 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 240/268/380
----196.4.160.2 PING Statistics----
66 packets transmitted, 66 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 40/74/180
----196.30.31.120 PING Statistics----
66 packets transmitted, 66 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 40/77/200
----216.239.38.10 PING Statistics----
66 packets transmitted, 66 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip (ms) min/avg/max = 320/347/460
Getting back to where it should be...
F
Fudzy
Guest
Anybody else find your results get better the more times you do the test? Surely it shouldn't be caching the data your benchmarking?
who.is.michael
Expert Member
Use Crtl F5 ro refresh the page, so it does not deliver cached data...
Last-Attacker
Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2006
- Messages
- 18
- Reaction score
- 0
Here it is with iburst @ home:
Pinging 216.239.38.10 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=414ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=421ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=390ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=468ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=500ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Ping statistics for 216.239.38.10:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 328ms, Maximum = 500ms, Average = 368ms
Pinging 216.239.38.10 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=414ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=421ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=328ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=359ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=390ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=468ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=375ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=500ms TTL=237
Reply from 216.239.38.10: bytes=32 time=343ms TTL=237
Ping statistics for 216.239.38.10:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 328ms, Maximum = 500ms, Average = 368ms
Ping statistics for 216.239.38.10:
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 326ms, Maximum = 464ms, Average = 361ms
Looks like there is an improvement indeed!
Packets: Sent = 30, Received = 30, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 326ms, Maximum = 464ms, Average = 361ms
Looks like there is an improvement indeed!
who.is.michael
Expert Member
Contacted Gamco...
From: GamCo (Pty) Ltd - - Support [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 09 February 2007 09:10 AM
To: michael
Subject: [GamCo Support #RMD-592925]: Bandwidth meter delivering incorrect results....
Hi Michael
Thanks for you mail!
I believe the bandwidth meter is accurate but you can test your speeds at the following link, to see if they give the same info:
http://speedtest-rba.isdsl.net/
Kind Regards
Paulus
Ticket Details Ticket ID: RMD-592925
Department: Support - PW
Priority: Low
Status: Closed
If not try... http://www.interexcel-iburst.co.za/speed_test.asp
From: GamCo (Pty) Ltd - - Support [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 09 February 2007 09:10 AM
To: michael
Subject: [GamCo Support #RMD-592925]: Bandwidth meter delivering incorrect results....
Hi Michael
Thanks for you mail!
I believe the bandwidth meter is accurate but you can test your speeds at the following link, to see if they give the same info:
http://speedtest-rba.isdsl.net/
Kind Regards
Paulus
Ticket Details Ticket ID: RMD-592925
Department: Support - PW
Priority: Low
Status: Closed
If not try... http://www.interexcel-iburst.co.za/speed_test.asp
F
Fudzy
Guest
Lol, I also found that test increases with refreshes. Maybe its just somthing to account for. Then again, speedtest.net doesn't go up the more times I do the test, it goes down actually.
who.is.michael
Expert Member
It's Monday packet loss has returned...
Anyone else?
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 240, Received = 236, Lost = 4 (1% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 82ms
Ping statistics for 196.30.31.120:
Packets: Sent = 24, Received = 23, Lost = 1 (4% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 178ms, Average = 104ms
Ping statistics for 196.35.70.120:
Packets: Sent = 31, Received = 29, Lost = 2 (6% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 213ms, Maximum = 305ms, Average = 240ms
Ping statistics for 64.233.161.104:
Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 10, Lost = 1 (9% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 523ms, Maximum = 626ms, Average = 557ms
Ping statistics for 196.35.164.204:
Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 8, Lost = 3 (27% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 232ms, Maximum = 262ms, Average = 244ms
Anyone else?
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 240, Received = 236, Lost = 4 (1% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 42ms, Maximum = 275ms, Average = 82ms
Ping statistics for 196.30.31.120:
Packets: Sent = 24, Received = 23, Lost = 1 (4% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 63ms, Maximum = 178ms, Average = 104ms
Ping statistics for 196.35.70.120:
Packets: Sent = 31, Received = 29, Lost = 2 (6% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 213ms, Maximum = 305ms, Average = 240ms
Ping statistics for 64.233.161.104:
Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 10, Lost = 1 (9% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 523ms, Maximum = 626ms, Average = 557ms
Ping statistics for 196.35.164.204:
Packets: Sent = 11, Received = 8, Lost = 3 (27% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 232ms, Maximum = 262ms, Average = 244ms
Could only respond now as I just walked in:
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=66ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=82ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=160ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=85ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=69ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=72ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 77ms
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=66ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=82ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=160ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=85ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=69ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=72ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 77ms
who.is.michael
Expert Member
Hi Mr H
Yeah that's after hours, try office hours.... FRUSTRATING
Yeah that's after hours, try office hours.... FRUSTRATING
Ekhaatvensters
Executive Member
I did actually try a few pings around the time that was posted, and mine didn't seem to have any loss. Out of 10 pings to MyADSL, and there were spikes, but no timeouts..
I'll check again properly tomorrow morning..
I'll check again properly tomorrow morning..
are you sure it's iBurst? I'll be willing to bet if you tried the same thing on an ADSL line during office hours you'd also get a similar packet loss.
9:05am test
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 63ms
EDIT: I'll gather some more ping tests over the next few hours and post the whole lot later today.
10:02am test
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 65ms, Average = 62ms
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=67ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=66ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 73ms, Average = 63ms
EDIT: I'll gather some more ping tests over the next few hours and post the whole lot later today.
10:02am test
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 65ms, Average = 62ms
Last edited:
who.is.michael
Expert Member
Your tower / connection does seem better...
Tx MrH
12:42 13/02/07
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 48, Received = 48, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 175ms, Average = 81ms
No loss today... Will check later, give me a time when you check so I can check from my side at the same time...
Tx MrH
12:42 13/02/07
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 48, Received = 48, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 51ms, Maximum = 175ms, Average = 81ms
No loss today... Will check later, give me a time when you check so I can check from my side at the same time...
Mze
Well-Known Member
Adsl
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% packet loss)
Approximate round trip times in milliseconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 42ms
Packet loss? You'd lose your bet.
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% packet loss)
Approximate round trip times in milliseconds:
Minimum = 39ms, Maximum = 70ms, Average = 42ms
Packet loss? You'd lose your bet.
Here are the ping tests for today:
-------------------------------
11:04am
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=62ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=68ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=159ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=75ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 159ms, Average = 71ms
--------------------------
12:08
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=158ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=73ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=69ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=76ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=60ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 158ms, Average = 73ms
----------------------------
13:05
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=160ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=83ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=78ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=104ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 76ms
------------------------------------
14:10
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 176ms, Average = 71ms
-------------------------
15:07
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 79ms, Average = 63ms
---------------------------------------
16:04
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 84ms, Average = 65ms
--------------------------------------
17:01
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 14, Received = 14, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 64ms, Average = 61ms
--------------------------------
No real difference thats worth worrying about as far as I can see.
-------------------------------
11:04am
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=62ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=68ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=159ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=75ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 159ms, Average = 71ms
--------------------------
12:08
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=158ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=73ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=69ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=76ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=60ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 60ms, Maximum = 158ms, Average = 73ms
----------------------------
13:05
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=160ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=83ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=78ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=104ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 59ms, Maximum = 160ms, Average = 76ms
------------------------------------
14:10
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=61ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 176ms, Average = 71ms
-------------------------
15:07
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=79ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 79ms, Average = 63ms
---------------------------------------
16:04
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=82ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=84ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=32 time=64ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 12, Received = 12, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 57ms, Maximum = 84ms, Average = 65ms
--------------------------------------
17:01
Pinging 196.7.147.165 with 1 bytes of data:
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=63ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=58ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=60ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=59ms TTL=247
Reply from 196.7.147.165: bytes=1 time=64ms TTL=247
Ping statistics for 196.7.147.165:
Packets: Sent = 14, Received = 14, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 58ms, Maximum = 64ms, Average = 61ms
--------------------------------
No real difference thats worth worrying about as far as I can see.
Hi All
I have had some reports where packet loss is still a problem. I have the technical guys on this again to make sure everthing is OK. In the meantime, if there are others out there having high packet loss problems, please post your readings here and I can then feed this back to the technical team.
Thanks all
Ed
I have had some reports where packet loss is still a problem. I have the technical guys on this again to make sure everthing is OK. In the meantime, if there are others out there having high packet loss problems, please post your readings here and I can then feed this back to the technical team.
Thanks all
Ed