iburst seen as spam again

196.46.70.1 listed in bl.spamcop.net (127.0.0.2)

If there are no reports of ongoing objectionable email from this system it will be delisted automatically in a short time.
Causes of listing

* System has sent mail to SpamCop spam traps in the past week (spam traps are secret, no reports or evidence are provided by SpamCop)
* SpamCop users have reported system as a source of spam less than 10 times in the past week

Additional potential problems
(these factors do not directly result in spamcop listing)

* System administrator has already delisted this system once

Because of the above problems, express-delisting is not available
Listing History
System has been listed for less than 24 hours.
Dispute Listing
If you are the administrator of this system and you are sure this listing is erroneous, you may request that we review the listing. Because everyone wants to dispute their listing, regardless of merit, we reserve the right to ignore meritless disputes.
Dispute listing of 196.46.70.1

-----------------------------------
I wonder what a 'spam trap' is?
 
what do you mean 'again' did you think all spam databases were cleared the second WBS banned SMTP?
 
actually it is AGAIN ...

since it has already been cleared off the spamcop listings in the past ....


Just wish WBS would get this sorted ... amazing how the other ISP's have managed to avoid this problem ... except SENTECH that is ... their's spends more itme listed than de-listed ...
 
Their Technical Manager probably got his A+ and thought he was the shiznit :p Thats why I never use ISP's email servers, but seeing as you guys are now forced to... shame man.
 
Hello @wbs.co.za,

Someone (probably you or one of your users) has asked that SpamCop delist
your server (196.46.70.1) from the SpamCop blocking list. If you did
not request this email, you may check the extended headers of it for
information on who did.

Please be aware that this is a one-time offer. If you delist your server
and it continues to be the target of spam reports, it will be re-listed and
you will not be allowed to delist it again.

Please take the time to understand the reason for the spam reports against
this system and ensure that they will not continue after SpamCop delists
this system.

If you are sure that the issue is resolved, click the link below to delist
your system:
http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?delist=zebfa5a17a25168c232ff8152724178f1zc42e4601
 
@Rich, please tell me that you got that from WBS or your work for them? They should be responsible for the removal of their servers from spam lists. You removing it yourself undermines the whole SBL concept and possibly drags it to a point where it can't be delisted any more.
Let WBS handle it and nail the crap out of their users and do thing properly.
 
I used to own the abuse addy ... but the buggers took it away without even telling me ... ggrrr .. if he got it I'd be VERY miffed ;-) grin
 
LOL, WBS took abuse :D, I doubt [email protected] is taken - anyone wanna try it...?

WBS really are a bunch of twits bcos abuse@ and postmaster@ on any such domain should be reserved as per standards...
 
TheRoDent said:
Lol, Richard probably owns the abuse@wbs addy now :)
Click to expand...

Yebo, I own those e-mail accounts, not going to say which one but, going to store all of those abuse e-mails.

Maybe give it to the media or something to say iBURST are useless company if they can't own those e-mail accounts.



ic said:
LOL, WBS took abuse :D, I doubt [email protected] is taken - anyone wanna try it...?

WBS really are a bunch of twits bcos abuse@ and postmaster@ on any such domain should be reserved as per standards...
Click to expand...


That's why WBS = Useless I've been trying to tell them for about 4 months to sort it once e-mail accounts came out and guess what I'm still waiting they said they would fix it but I guess they can't......

They can't take those e-mail addys away from you either since they belong to you. I'm sure it would be brech of contract if they took them away.....

I'll give it to them Bribe them for it or they can pay me to use it :P

Just playing around with the statement
 
Last edited:
RichardG said:
They can't take those e-mail addys away from you either since they belong to you. I'm sure it would be brech of contract if they took them away.....
Click to expand...
They do not belong to you. In a legal sense you are renting the @wbs.co.za addresses not buying them, so depending on the contract they may well be within their rights to take away a specific address and supply you with another one. But since I don't have a contract I can't say anything specific. Maybe post the relevant part of the contract that would make it breach?
 
DFantom said:
They do not belong to you. In a legal sense you are renting the @wbs.co.za addresses not buying them, so depending on the contract they may well be within their rights to take away a specific address and supply you with another one. But since I don't have a contract I can't say anything specific. Maybe post the relevant part of the contract that would make it breach?
Click to expand...

I know they've all the right to take it away from you.
That I know....
 
Regarding my e-mail address, I've checked now they've taken it away from me bladdy heads,

They were maybe reading this according to me they just took it out now about 20mins ago or so since it was still activated
 
If you come up with a half assed solution to a problem, it normally doesn't work.
"Thou shalt not whore port 25".
 
hehe i was checking some logs of my e-mail look what i got :


SpamCop V1.466 ]
This message is brief for your comfort. Please use links below for details.

Email from 196.2.127.9 / Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:24:58 +0100
http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?i=z1461396701zcaaf5518f80083a1eca18c6bf7ca410fz

[ Offending message ]
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from calcetalk.umd.edu (calcetalk.umd.edu [128.8.135.66])
by po1.wam.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j65LRgRu003027
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:27:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from calce.umd.edu (calce.umd.edu [128.8.135.65])
by calcetalk.umd.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j65L8ZdL026247
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:08:35 -0400
Resent-Message-Id: <[email protected]>
Received: from CALCENWS/SpoolDir by calce.umd.edu (Mercury 1.48);
5 Jul 05 17:23:57 -0400
Received: from SpoolDir by CALCENWS (Mercury 1.48); 5 Jul 05 17:23:53 -0400
Received: from CALCENWS/SpoolDir by calce.umd.edu (Mercury 1.48)
for <x>; 5 Jul 05 17:22:53 -0400
Resent-from: x
Resent-to: x
Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:22:53 -0400
X-Autoforward: 1
Received: from mail.calce.umd.edu (128.8.135.49) by calce.umd.edu (Mercury 1.48) with ESMTP;
5 Jul 05 17:22:05 -0400
Received: from po0.glue.umd.edu (po0.glue.umd.edu [128.8.70.17])
by mail.calce.umd.edu (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j65LL0SU008278
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:21:00 -0400
Received: from mailfw1.umd.edu (IDENT:[email protected] [128.8.10.57])
by po0.glue.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j65LPjj9007912
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:25:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from calcetalk.umd.edu (calcetalk.umd.edu [128.8.135.66])
by mailfw1.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j65LPhqL023718
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:25:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from calcetalk.umd.edu (calcetalk.umd.edu [127.0.0.1])
by calcetalk.umd.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j65L6adL026242
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:06:36 -0400
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
by calcetalk.umd.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id j65L6aAl026238
for webmaster-outgoing; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:06:36 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: calcetalk.umd.edu: majordomo set sender to owner-x using -f
Received: from calce.umd.edu (calce.umd.edu [128.8.135.65])
by calcetalk.umd.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j65L6ZdL026235
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:06:35 -0400
Received: from CALCENWS/SpoolDir by calce.umd.edu (Mercury 1.48);
5 Jul 05 17:21:57 -0400
Received: from SpoolDir by CALCENWS (Mercury 1.48); 5 Jul 05 17:21:53 -0400
Received: from mail.calce.umd.edu (128.8.135.49) by calce.umd.edu (Mercury 1.48) with ESMTP;
5 Jul 05 17:21:53 -0400
Received: from mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37])
by mail.calce.umd.edu (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j65LKajE008258
for <x>; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 17:20:45 -0400
Received: from mk-cpfront-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com ([212.74.114.4]:41784 helo=mk-cpfrontend.uk.tiscali.com)
by mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com with esmtp (Exim 4.51)
id 1DpuuJ-0008tD-Fg; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 22:24:45 +0100
Received: from [196.2.127.9] by mk-cpfrontend.uk.tiscali.com with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:24:58 +0100
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 23:24:58 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
From: [email protected]
Subject: rep
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 128.8.135.49
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 128.8.135.49
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by calcetalk.umd.edu id j65L6ZdL026236
Sender: owner-x
Precedence: bulk

THE DESK OF CHAIRMAN
Sub-committee on finace
South African World cup bid 2010
24 Steven Bikko blvrd
Pretoria,south africa.

Dear Friend,you must be aware now that my countryThe Repulic of South Africa
won the bid to host the world cup by 2010, prior to this bid my committee
was mandated to lobby the members of board of Federation International Football
Association (FIFA) on selection of the country to host the world,the bidding
was intensive but at the end we got the hosting right.

My committee was given the sum of $29 million dollars tolobby the members
of the FIFA ruling body to make sure that we win the hosting right considering
the gain that comes with the hosting right like South Africa's economy will
receive a massive direct boost from hosting the 2010 World Cup, financial
impact report for South Africa's World Cup bid committee shows that the 2010
World Cup will pump R21.3-billion into South Africa's economy,and creating
an estimated 159 000 new jobs.

With the help the living legend of our time 85-year-old Nobel Peace Prize
winner Dr.Nelson Mandela who made an emotive case forThe Republic of South
Africa, we got the bid without spending all the money, i and my commitee
members saw this as a God sent opportunity to secure our future and that
of our family therefore,l was mandated by other committee members to look
for a way to move the remaining money to a safe place with the help of a
foreigner who we can trust and is ready to assist us to move the funds considering
the fact that we are still members of the bid commitee and in the eyes of
the public .

we have in our possession the sum $21millon since we spent just $8million
for lobbying. we are ready to give you 20% for all your assistance then me
and my coleague will keep 80% lf you are willing kindly reply to my letter
and further directive bearing in mind that confidentiality is of great essence
so is time in this project i will await your response. Best Regards

Dr. Mark Sitelo

Ps All Response should be direscted to my secure email address ([email protected])




___________________________________________________________

Book yourself something to look forward to in 2005.
Cheap flights - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel/flights/
Bargain holidays - http://www.tiscali.co.uk/travel/holidays/
 
TheRoDent said:
Lol, Richard probably owns the abuse@wbs addy now :)
Click to expand...



Lol Nope , I owned it for a while , but WBS took it back ( Without asking ) :D
 
"My committee was given the sum of $29 million dollars tolobby the members
of the FIFA ruling body to make sure that we win the hosting right "

Thats called a bribe! :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X