<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Mean_Monster</i>
<br /><i>From
http://www.iburst.co.za/technology.php</i>
<b>"As a result the iBurst network is able to provide data rates of up to 1 Mbps to each user with a maximum base station capacity of 20 Mbps."</b>
My question is if you have 20 noone's downloading porn 24/7 [

]in your area (and looking at the coverage map the areas covered by one tower are huge), how slow will your downloads and browsing become. Or am I missing something?
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">Each base station is capable of handling 640 simultaneous connections, which is the setup WBS's implementation will probably adopt. However, if they needed to, the towers could be upgraded to handle 2000 simultaneous connections.
Not all connections would necessarily be 1Mbps. Some would be lower due to product packaging, others could be throtled due to modulation negotiated, etc. Eventual number of connections would depend on the contention ratios WBS would decide upon, taking the 20Mbps backhauls into consideration.
In my opinion, if WBS has to handle 640 connections per tower, they would be doing well. It would be easy enough to just setup another tower. Cost of setting up iBurst towers is relatively low.
Current coverage maps are merely intended for initial rollout plans. Over time, blanket coverage is planned for the major cities.
<hr noshade size="1"><center><i><font size="1">
My views are mine, and mine alone.</i></font id="size1"></center>