India Population Grows to 1.2 Billion

[Alan]

New Delhi (AP) - India is now home to 17 percent of the world's people as its population climbed to 1.21 billion this year, though growth actually slowed for the first time in 90 years, census officials said Thursday.

The South Asian nation -- second only to China in number of people -- added 181 million in the past decade, said C. Chandramouli, the census commissioner. That increase alone is nearly the entire population of Brazil

United Nations projections show that India could overtake China and its 1.34 billion people as the world's most populous nation by 2030, though Chandramouli said a more rigorous analysis of data would be needed before India made its own projections.

India's population is now nearly equal to the combined populations of the United States, Indonesia, Brazil, Japan, Bangladesh, Pakistan, he said.

Yet, the 17.6 percent increase was down from 21.5 in the last count a decade ago. The last time India showed slowing in population growth was in the 1921 census.

The numbers released Thursday were preliminary and official figures and analysis weren't expected to be released until next year.

The census, India's 15th since 1872, was a mammoth effort spread out over a year. It involved 2.7 million census-takers who surveyed some 300 million households, noting for the first time whether people live in basic huts or concrete structures, have electricity and access to toilets and if they have spent any time in schools.

The questions will help administrators develop policies and set budgets for a nation where 800 million people live in poverty.

Almost all residents, regardless of nationality, are included in the count, even those imprisoned like Pakistani Ajmal Kasab, who is on death row for his role in the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks. Millions of homeless were also counted.

The initial numbers show a decline in the number of children under the age of 6, down 5 million since 2001 to 158.8 million. They also indicate a continuing preference for male children over females in a country where female infanticide is still common and the government has banned doctors from revealing the sex of unborn children.

A gender breakdown among children showed fewer girls than boys are being born or surviving, with 914 girls for every 1,000 boys under the age of 6, compared to 927 for every 1,000 in the last census.

"This is a matter of grave concern," Chandramouli said.

Indians continue to favor sons over daughters mostly because of the enormous expenses involved in marrying off girls. Even the poorest families are often likely to go into debt arranging marriages and paying elaborate dowries to their daughter's new family. Hindu custom also dictates that only sons can light funeral pyres.

"Whatever measures that have been put in over the last 40 years has not had any impact on child sex ratio and therefore that requires a complete review," India's Home Secretary G.K. Pillai said.

The overall sex-ratio showed a marginal improvement, with 940 women counted for every 1,000 men compared to 933 in the last census.

The census also showed that the literacy rate went up to 74 percent nationwide for people aged 7 and older, from about 65 percent in the last count.

800 million people in poverty or 2/3 of the country? That's around 2.5 times as many people as there are in the 3rd most populist country the U.S.

I'm sure Gandhi is proud

 

[FrankCastle]

Prepare for a massive recount in January 2012 if they win the WC.

 

[SinghDude]

F@rking Indians.



Should rather watch more cricket than make babies.

 

[fluent]

800 million people in poverty or 2/3 of the country? That's around 2.5 times as many people as there are in the 3rd most populist country the U.S.

I'm sure Gandhi is proud

What's your point... ?

India as a nation is improving... previously there was a greater % of the population in poverty... it has been a major challenge... atleast India's heading in the right direction...

Literacy increased about 10% from the last census a decade ago (65 -> 74%)... as I'm sure you know the improvement of education levels reduces poverty (in this piece they only have literacy levels and not formal education enrollments and no. of graduates etc, but trust me they are on the rise)..

so all in all things are looking very positive for the country ... (I'm not sure the same can be said about SA's education trend... matric results aren't showing concrete signs of improvement... people without a decent education will continue to be unemployed or do low wage jobs)...

So yes... Gandhi would be proud... ! And you keep watching over the next 2 decades and see how india does

 

[ponder]

Shocking.

As for things getting better this could be a double edged sword. The more money people earn the more resources they consume.

 

[genetic]

I suppose the Indian government doesn't offer free condoms?

They'll never be able to sustain that population rate for very long. Food, resources, healthcare... They'll fall hard. China has tried to tackle their population rate for a number of years already.

India might need to do the same. It's just not sustainable.

 

[Rosaudio]

2/3rds of the population are in poverty? And I thought India was the next big superpower?

 

[boramk]

China has tried to tackle their population rate for a number of years already.

Now its bit them in the arse. China's future growth prospects have been slashed already, their population is to peak by 2016, their workforce has already started to shrink. They are joining other East Asian countries such as Korea and Japan in slow and gradual decline.
Indians population might be seen as a bane to some, but it is actually a boon. Look towards countries that are going to be economic giants: countries that have vibrant and young populations that spur innovation and growth.

Of course, it all matters on how the Indian government does its jobs. If done poorly, this population boom is going to be just another one going through grinding poverty

 

[genetic]

Now its bit them in the arse. China's future growth prospects have been slashed already, their population is to peak by 2016, their workforce has already started to shrink.

They have an ageing population - something that'll 'bite them in the arse' as you say in the very near future.

Problem with population control is that you should never enforce whether you can or cannot have a child onto anyone as a government - it's their fundamental human right to decide. Problem comes in however if those that have children actually can't afford them.

 

[Hard Rain]

I should remind posters that the global population in 1900 was below 2 billion people and the great bulk of them lived in what we would today describe as "absolute poverty".