Insane Clown Posse questions science

BCO

Honorary Master
Joined
Dec 17, 2004
Messages
13,229
Reaction score
27
Location
Slaapstad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs

Pure magic is the birth of my kids
I've seen **** that'll shock your eyelids
The sun and the moon, and even Mars
The Milky Way and ****ing shooting stars
UFOs, a river flows
Plant a little seed and nature grows
Niagara falls and the pyramids
Everything you believed in as kids
****ing rainbows after it rains
there's enough miracles here to blow your brains
I fed a fish to a pelican at Frisco bay
It tried to eat my cell phone, he ran away
And music is magic, pure and clean
You can feel it and hear it but it can't be seen

I see miracles all around me
Stop and look around, it's all astounding
Water, fire, air and dirt
****ing magnets, how do they work?
And I don't wanna talk to a scientist
Y'all mother****ers lying, and getting me pissed
Solar eclipse, and vicious weather

lol

Someone's written a science textbook now, just for Juggalos.

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/04/1..._campaign=Feed:+boingboing/iBag+(Boing+Boing)
 
Nope, they are a christian guerilla rap group, using the rap culture to do anti science, and allowing an opening to be made for religious bs to be inserted in kids.
 
Nope, they are a christian guerilla rap group, using the rap culture to do anti science, and allowing an opening to be made for religious bs to be inserted in kids.

You're a Juggalo ?????
 
Typical scientist lying and getting me pissed.

You are so not down with the clown. :p

What hell does that mean?;)

reminds of my stupid nephew, comes dumb ideas from his cell mates. (It's impossible for water to change into wine, at least without the use of a huge particle accelerator and lots of time)
 
Last edited:
What hell does that mean?;)

reminds of my stupid nephew, comes dumb ideas from his cell mates. (It's impossible for water to change into wine, at least without the use of a huge particle accelerator and lots of time)

I have no idea what it means. I think all the juggalos say it to each other. "I am down with the clown".

Unless you're talking about the scientist thing, I am even more clueless on that one. Scientists lying? About magnets?!?

If any of you are interested I found this article on the first verse quite funny: (warning some parts of this site are NSFW)
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/insane-clown-posse.php
 
It’s a take-off of the replicants dying speech (famous last words) in the movie ‘Bladerunner’.

One of my favourite films of all time!

You mean this one:

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I've watched c-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those ... moments will be lost in time, like tears...in rain. Time to die.

I don't get it.
 
One of my favourite films of all time!

I would argue that there is an insidious anti-science propaganda message been propagated via extremely popular sci-fi movies. Think about the subliminal messages in movies like:

1. Bladerunner
2. Terminator 1, 2....5000

What are they really saying?

Huh! Huh!
 
I would argue that there is an insidious anti-science propaganda message been propagated via extremely popular sci-fi movies. Think about the subliminal messages in movies like:

1. Bladerunner
2. Terminator 1, 2....5000

What are they really saying?

Huh! Huh!

Well it has been argued that Deckard himself may have been a replicant. Showing that science polices itself and fixes it's own mistakes. Something I regard as pretty positive.

Even though I'm not 100% sure about your post and whether or not it was tongue-in-cheek or sarcasm (man we need a tag for that) I think you do have a point. The dystopian (this word is not in the spell checker? seriously?) future presented in those films (lol Terminator 5000) do have a "repent and return to nature and junk because otherwise THIS is going to happen!" message in there. Doesn't stop it being one of my fave films ever though. :p
 
Well it has been argued that Deckard himself may have been a replicant. Showing that science polices itself and fixes it's own mistakes. Something I regard as pretty positive.

Even though I'm not 100% sure about your post and whether or not it was tongue-in-cheek or sarcasm (man we need a tag for that) I think you do have a point. The dystopian (this word is not in the spell checker? seriously?) future presented in those films (lol Terminator 5000) do have a "repent and return to nature and junk because otherwise THIS is going to happen!" message in there. Doesn't stop it being one of my fave films ever though. :p

Well it has been argued that Deckard himself may have been a replicant. Showing that science polices itself and fixes it's own mistakes. Something I regard as pretty positive.

Anecdotal fanboi speculation. Happens with many cult movies/books etc. Overanalysis. Gibson in an interview (author of the cult novel ‘Neuromancer’) said that some of the theories were so bizarre about ‘what he meant’ that he was truly shocked and mystified. Nope. Fail.

Even though I'm not 100% sure about your post and whether or not it was tongue-in-cheek or sarcasm (man we need a tag for that) I think you do have a point.

Actually neither. It’s a genuine question that I am insecure about. Hence the butt-covering in case I was pooh-poohed out of court. Ego protection. But you DO think I have a point (and you can’t take it back).

Doesn't stop it being one of my fave films ever though.

And it shouldn’t. The issues are entirely separate.

What bothers me though is that the anti-science faction (who I have always held in contempt) have produced pretty good movies to reinforce their point. Maybe they are not as foolish as I have always thought? Scary. Cognitive dissonance?
 
What bothers me though is that the anti-science faction (who I have always held in contempt) have produced pretty good movies to reinforce their point. Maybe they are not as foolish as I have always thought? Scary. Cognitive dissonance?

Actually, I am going to sit on the fence with this one. Receptors open, gathering data. I can see how this pushes the agenda for the anti-science faction and have some grudging support for this view. However, I can’t believe that the anti group would be so sophisticated as to use advanced media technology, good story lines and decent movies (the things they are against) to push their agenda. They all wear sandals, eat bean sprouts, worship Gaia and advocate a return to nature, don’t they?

I wonder if the directors of the movies are pro or anti. They would wield substantial influence. I must Google.
 
what are the differences?

A quasar is the compact central part of an active galaxy that surrounds the super-massive black hole (the largest type of black hole possible in a galaxy).

A meson is a subatomic particle consisting of a quark and an anti-quark.

Good enough?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X