International Bandwidth

alipchin

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2003
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Location
South Africa.
The main issue that I seem to find with Telkom and ADSL is the following: Telkom have provided a single international pipe to provide every single user on the ADSL service with bandwidth. The service has taken off like wild fire even though people are uncertain about the what the service can actually offer.
So the demand for ADSL has increased yet the bandwidth provisioning has not been made to supply enough bandwidth for these users. So what does Telkom need to?
Increase the size of there international bandwidth pipe for ADSL users which will therefore reduce the amount of congestion on ADSL.
 
I see one of the biggest complaints being the initially undeclared port prioritisation that Telkom implemented to stop non HTTP/FTP or e-mail applications from 'abusing' the network and to enhance browsing and e-mail applications. This is a logical step however Telkom failed to take into account that many users utilise applications that require specific ports, and these ports are severly crippled by the port prioritisation.

The biggest problem as I see it was that P2P application users (kazaa) theatened to 'bog' down the network and Telkom over-reacted.

Many users have specific applications that require a special port, example IRC , video and audio and international gaming.

Personally I have a problem with the bandwidth allocated to users who have exceeded thier cap, I expect at least the same performance I got from my old dial-up account, if not slightly better. As it stands I can't use the international connection when I am capped it is virtually useless for browsing or downloads via HTTP/FTP.
 
Hi ASnogarD,

I agree completely with you. I can live with the cap & will even buy additional GB's at a REASONABLE price.

My major irritations is:
1.)Port prioritation - everybody should be allowed to use their 3GB as they please.
2.)International bandwith - dedicated bandwith per user.
3.)After cap bandwith - should be AT LEAST equal to dial-up.
 
i Cannot believe that i am not able to do what i got the adsl for: Gaming. I got my adsl 3 days ago. A few minutes ago when i called telscum the operator told me i have been capped. My adsl for the other 27 days of the month is basically worthless then.

So i agree with you, after i have been capped i would at least want something similar to isdn. That is what i had a week ago and before i got this problems.[V]

As it is, this is almost the only website that i can access. Even the telkom site is down.
 
Agree - the speeds after capping should be at least at the same level as what a good dial-up connection gives
 
Yeah, I agree with the main points.

Port Priorities

International Traffic ( Esp during the day )

3 GB cap could do with some increasing, esp if it is for total bw used.

I do alot of my work with our Finland office over a VPN and ADSL is useless for it at the moment.
 
Another point would be that local traffic shouldn't count towards your 3GB limit. The other issues are more important, but I think a lot of ADSL users agree that counting local traffic towards your cap is silly.
 
Agreed. What exactly is the point of the three gig cap? From what I gather it is to prevent those that telkom deems as "malicious users" from consuming large amounts of international bandwidth. Why is this done? South Africa is very far behind when it comes to the internet; we have to pay large sums of money in order to keep our international links and as virtually no internet content is produced here, the cost of bandwidth rests on the average internet user, instead of being offset by advertising revenue, <b><i>COMPETITION IN THE TELECOM INDUSTRY</i></b>, etc, as what happens internationally.

Why, then, does local traffic count towards this cap? Surely local bandwidth is far cheaper than international bandwidth, as less of it is required, as well as the fact that local traffic has a shorter distance to travel. I can certainly see why Telkom requires some sort of bandwidth restriction on users - in order to ensure they don't get bankrupted by a couple of users downloading huge amounts of content. My problem, however, lies with how they control the cap. Three gigabytes of content in a month is nothing, considering we are receiving a (theoretically) 24/7 512kbps connection, and as it currently stands once one reaches their cap, ADSL becomes virtually useless as it is impossible to even browse international websites.

As an extreme example (ignoring upstream bandwidth) - assuming there are 30 days on average in a month, which is equivalent to 2592000 seconds (30 * 24 * 60 * 60), and that the maximum download capacity of one of Telkoms ADSL links is 65536 bytes per second (512 * 1024 / 8), this yields 169869312000 bytes of downstream traffic per month, or in a more convenient format, 158.2 gigabytes of potential downstream traffic per month.

Obviously you would be hard-pressed to find someone who is even capable of reaching this theoretical limit - most users would probablly find it difficult to (meaningfully) use even a tenth of this - 15.82 gigabytes of downstream traffic per month. What it basically comes down to is either Telkom is under a lot of strain financially in order to justify imposing a 3 gig cap on <b>all</b> ADSL traffic, or they are simply abusing their monopolistic position and just plain-old ripping people off, 'cause we have no-one else to turn to. Somehow I'm guessing it's the latter case.

&lt;/rant&gt;
 
erm, I think a R1 billion net profit rules out the financial strain. And to think they can't even reinvest this money back into the infrastructure - local/international. Think it more likely a case of greed by the directors ... greater the profit == bigger bonus.
 
I just wish adsl users could get better pings 2 intl gaming servers for instance ppl with 128k isdn are getting better pings than ppl on adsl atm
 
So i agree with you, after i have been capped i would at least want something similar to isdn. That is what i had a week ago and before i got this problems.[V]

ISDN is what most of us had before we changed to ADSL. And it was cheaper. We should be entitled to that at the very least after capping.
 
Hmmm... I moved from 56k which would only connect at about 33.6k. Maybe lightning had something to play in that, but anyway, ADSL seemed like a dream come true, such a pity I woke up to a nightmare.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X