Iran reformists arrested after Tehran riots

w1z4rd

Karmic Sangoma
Joined
Jan 17, 2005
Messages
52,146
Reaction score
8,340
Location
127.0.0.1
At least 10 leaders of two Iranian reformist groups who backed defeated presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi have been arrested after President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election in a deeply-disputed vote sparked riots across Tehran.

The official IRNA news agency reported that two of those arrested were involved in orchestrating mass protests across the Iranian capital on Saturday that was unleashed after the results of the disputed election were known.

The demonstrations over incumbent hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's re-election in a vote his opponents say was rigged led to rioting on a scale unseen in Iran for nearly a decade.

"At least 10 members of the Islamic Iran Participation Front and the Islamic Revolution Mujahedeen Organisation were arrested yesterday," said Rajab Ali Mazroei, a member of the front.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6495691.ece

What makes me think these elections were rigged is Ahmadinejad's response to the riots. Weve had them, most countries have them, but the ANC didnt arrest a large chunk of the opposition. I dont think these elections were free and fair.

So in my books Iran is another Middle East FAILED democracy.
 
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article6495691.ece

What makes me think these elections were rigged is Ahmadinejad's response to the riots. Weve had them, most countries have them, but the ANC didnt arrest a large chunk of the opposition. I dont think these elections were free and fair.

So in my books Iran is another Middle East FAILED democracy.

Even if the other candidate won it still isn't a democracy. The 'Supreme Leader' Ali Khamenei runs the place. The Guardian Council decides who can run for president and rubber stamp the laws.

But yeah so much for Iran softening their stance now that Dubya has been replaced by the Obamasiah :o.
 
Free and Fair

The arrests are an appropriate response to organized riots, and the elections were free and fair. A lot more free and fair than the those held by flagship of 'so called' democracy, the US of A.

Not to mention, this opposition leader, Mir-Hossein Mousavi was involved in the Iran Contra Scandal back in the day and that he has been receiving praises from the Western Media agencies. Take a look at this site for evidence thereof Mir-Hossein Mousavi's Iran/Contra Connection?

"By [Ghorbanifar's] own account he was a refugee from the revolutionary government of Ayatullah Ruhollah Khomeini, which confiscated his businesses in Iran, yet he later became a trusted friend and kitchen adviser to Mir Hussein Mousavi, Prime Minister in the Khomeini government. Some U.S. officials who have dealt with Ghorbanifar praise him highly. Says Michael Ledeen, adviser to the Pentagon on counterterrorism: "[Ghorbanifar] is one of the most honest, educated, honorable men I have ever known." Others call him a liar who, as one puts it, could not tell the truth about the clothes he is wearing," (emphasis added).

"On or about November 25, 1985, Ledeen received a frantic phone call from Ghorbanifar, asking him to relay a message from [Mir-Hossein Mousavi] the prime minister of Iran to President Reagan regarding the shipment of the wrong type of HAWKs. Ledeen said the message essentially was "we've been holding up our part of the bargain, and here you people are now cheating us and tricking us and deceiving us and you had better correct this situation right away.''

But, I do have to wonder aloud: Seeing how we cannot ignore his 'neo-con' credentials and that Michael Ledeen maintained his very good relations with Ghorbanifar, (who at least used to be) a good friend of Mir-Hossein Mousavi (the 'candidate of change' in the Iranian presidential elections); and given the support that Mousavi's candidacy has been receiving from the American 'moderates', maybe this kind of 'change' is the 'regime change' the Americans have had in mind for Iran?

Election Protests in Tehran

Violence erupted in Tehran Saturday after officals announced election victory for incumbent President Ahmadinejad. Prompting supporters of challenger Mir Hossein Mousavi to protest after he had proclaimed a landslide win earlier on Friday.

Significantly, Mousawi’s claim came several hours before polling booths had even closed. So how did he know he had secured more than fifty per cent of the vote, as he claimed?

Survey: Ahmadinejad's popularity rises in Iran

The survey showed that 58.6% would vote for Ahmadinejad in the June 12 presidential elections, while some 21.9% would vote for Mousavi, Press TV said, citing the pro-government Web site, Rajanews.

I am no expert, but there is a possibility that there could be vote rigging. Apparently in last elections in Iran the same allegations were laid against Ahmadinejad, but they were not followed up on. Probably because they were false. If they were in fact true, the opposition would have forced a follow up wouldn't they?

I see it as a clear and decisive victory for Ahmadinejad because he is a populist leader, and he has the countries support.
 
President Obama on Saturday called on the Iranian government to "stop all violent and unjust actions against its own people" amid calls for the White House to go further in showing support for the Iranian people after the country's disputed elections.

Republicans, in particular, have pressed Obama to speak out more forcefully, as protesters and authorities clashed Saturday in Tehran during a government crackdown.

"The universal rights to assembly and free speech must be respected and the United States stands with all who seek to exercise those rights," Obama said in a written statement.

Obama also referred back to his speech this month to the Muslim world, saying "suppressing ideas never succeeds in making them go away. The Iranian people will ultimately judge the actions of their own government. If the Iranian government seeks the respect of the international community, it must respect the dignity of its own people and govern through consent, not coercion."

And Obama cited the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s, famous quote: "The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice."

"I believe that," Obama said. "The international community believes that. And right now, we are bearing witness to the Iranian peoples' belief in that truth, and we will continue to bear witness."

Republicans, who have pushed Obama to speak out more forcefully against Tehran's crackdown on protesters, said the president's statement was long overdue, coming a day after Congress passed a resolution condemning the crackdown on protesters.

"The Obama administration took a first step today," California Rep. Darrell Issa told FOX News. "Obviously, Congress was well ahead of the president. I think the president is playing catch-up."

Issa said the president, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and other Obama officials should make a series of additional statements to demonstrate when the United States stands.

"You have to support these people whose aspirations are only freedom," he said.

Before Obama's statement, Republicans had called on him to send a clear message that he supported the Iranian people despite the risk of appearing to meddle in Iranian affairs.

"I think what the president can do is make a strong statement on behalf of the people of Iran ... making clear it's not about a certain candidate," Michigan Rep. Pete Hoekstra, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee, told FOX News on Saturday. Remaining silent "sends the wrong message" to Iranians and other people in other oppressed countries.

It is not clear how many people have been killed or injured so far, but eyewitness accounts trickling out of the country depict a scene of a sometimes brutal confrontation, stemming from opposition supporters' belief that last week's election was rigged to re-elect hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Social networking sites have been the primary source of information since Iranian leaders have kicked foreign journalists out of the country.

Both chambers of Congress voted Friday to condemn Iran's crackdown on anti-government protesters. The resolution denounces the "ongoing violence" by the government and the Iranian government's suppression of the Internet and cell phones. It also expressed support for Iranian citizens who embrace freedom.

The resolution was initiated by Republicans partly to prod Obama, who has been reluctant to speak too strongly about the disputed elections that left Ahmadinejad in charge of the Muslim nation.

White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said the resolution is consistent with Obama's message condemning the violence in Iran. At the same time, he said the U.S. would not become a political football in a debate happening in Iran.

Obama told CBS News Friday that Iran would show its true colors by the way it dealt with the protests.

"I'm very concerned based on some of the tenor and tone of the statements that have been made that the government of Iran recognizes that the world is watching," he said. "How they approach and deal with people who are, through peaceful means, trying to be heard will, I think, send a pretty clear signal to the international community about what Iran is and is not."

Robert Tappan, a former State Department official, told FOX News that the U.S. should pursue a two-pronged strategy in dealing with Iran.

First, Tappan suggested the U.S. reach out to regional allies, like Turkey and Pakistan, "those who are engaged still with the Iranian government and behind the scenes really try to work to put the pressure on."

"Then the U.S. from an official government standpoint, really needs to hammer on the basic rights: freedom of assembly, freedom of the press, those different things."

Tappan added that Obama has to be exceedingly careful in how he engages Iran.

"We're walking a fine line here, and we can't look to be favoring one over the other till things settle down a bit," he said.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/20/republicans-pressure-obama-support-iranian-protesters/

That's not going to go down well with glowing Ahemi. Not good for when Obama comes begging for him to stop his nuke program :o
 
Hypocritical America

Hahaha.. That's so funny..

America advising Iran how to treat it's protesters, as it has a really lousy record and regularly injure and put people in prison for being politically active citizens.

In America you have "Free Speech Zones" and the Freedom to Gather has been almost erased in many parts of the country. These images are from various political conventions before last years elections.

Where was the twittered outrage for #ourownbackyard?

dnc-sonicsquirtgunpic.jpg

And the police were also waiting for them at the RNC convention in Minneapolis / St. Paul:

huffpo-4-knee-back-arrest.jpg

A picture of photographer experiencing 'pain compliance' before being charged with 'rioting' at the Republican National Convention.
huffpo-5-pepper-sprayed.jpg

A group of protesters and a journalist being pepper sprayed by police. The journalist was also later charged with 'rioting.'
huffpo-9-bridge-arrest.jpg

By the end of the event, the organizers of the protests had been charged with "furthering terrorism" (charges later dropped) and only embedded journalists had not been pepper sprayed or arrested:

Amy Goodman from Democracy Now Alternative News arrested

Check out my blog for more info on the Iran affair, and do some Research into Mr Mousavi and Mr Rafsanjani, as these individuals are orchestrating this coup.

Iranian Elections: The ‘Stolen Elections’ Hoax by Prof. James Petras

BBC Caught In Mass Public Deception With Iran Propaganda

The BBC has again been caught engaging in mass public deception by using photographs of pro-Ahmadinejad rallies in Iran and claiming they represent anti-government protests in favor of Hossein Mousavi.

An image used by the L.A. Times on the front page of its website Tuesday showed Iranian President Ahmadinejad waving to a crowd of supporters at a public event.

In a story covering the election protests yesterday, the BBC News website used a closer shot of the same scene, but with Ahmadinejad cut out of the frame. The caption under the photograph read, ‘Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi again defied a ban on protests’.

The BBC photograph is clearly a similar shot of the same pro-Ahmadinejad rally featured in the L.A. Times image, yet the caption erroneously claims it represents anti-Ahmadinejad protesters.

Afterwards BBC issued a retraction admitting that the images they used were misleading, they would not have done this were they not made aware that it was an incorrect.

BBC - What really happened
However, on Wednesday 17 June we made a mistake in a picture caption published on BBC News online. In the story Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran, we mistakenly stated that a Getty agency picture of a pro-Ahmadinejad rally was a pro-Mousavi rally.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X