South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
here we have it IS uses the BiPAC7404VGO billion router for their business uncapped.
I dont believe you will be able to get bridging working with 1. however 2. should be no problem at all.
It is, however the IP addr assigned by the PPPoE authentication for ADSL is not globally routable on the Internet. Only the 5 static IPs are, however only via the L2TP tunnel.The ADSL bridging should be on a different layer (transport) to the tunnels etc so i dont see why this cant happen
Doubt IS would ever give out the L2TP username & passwordand us not having the login
JayM, you're right ... was looking at this with blinkers on. Thought Necuno was looking to get unshaped on IS by using bridging to circumvent any IP traffic shaping functionality within the IOS config, not by using a secondary SAIX account.but there should be nothing stopping one from establishing another PPPoE connection through the router to another ISP
JayM, you're right ... was looking at this with blinkers on. Thought Necuno was looking to get unshaped on IS by using bridging to circumvent any IP traffic shaping functionality within the IOS config, not by using a secondary SAIX account.
Of course if you can get the enable password, it would be easy peasy to create another PPPoE connection and direct some traffic down it with static routes, while leaving the original PPPoE & L2TP connections untouched.
Good point, I take running the latest (actually early release) versions for granted.The code must be 12.4(15) or later to support adding a 2nd PPPoE connection to the ATM interface.
Yes IS assigned. Jogging my memory a bit, I think the ADSL assigned IP is actually globaly routable but under the same traffic policy restrictions as the Express product. The IP assigned on the L2TP tunnel is not routable, only the 5 static IPs (bound to the loopback) which are also free from (excessive?) traffic shaping.Roman, as far as I know there is PPPoE connection running from the Cisco router which gets a dynmic IP routed to it over IPConnect.
Good point, I take running the latest (actually early release) versions for granted.
Yes IS assigned. Jogging my memory a bit, I think the ADSL assigned IP is actually globaly routable by under the same traffic policy restrictions as the Express product. The IP assigned on the L2TP tunnel is not routable, only the 5 static IPs (bound to the loopback) which are also free from (excessive?) traffic shaping.
The LAN IP range is NAT overloaded onto the first static IP while the other 4 can be used for static 1to1 mappings for mail & web servers etc. In essence the aim of the IS Business ADSL product is to provide leased line type functionality over (Telkom restricted) DSL technology.
Suppose they have different variations of the config for differing stiuations. I've seen sites with many more than 5 PCs and sometimes servers on 192.168 private addresses running solely behind the Cisco.Correct on most counts, but I don't think the 5 static IP's are bound to the loopback, nor overload natted to the ethernet IP - they are usable simply because they are on the same subnet as the Ethernet IP. The 5 IPs can be assigned directly to hosts, and are not NATted on the router. I used one of these briefly a few years back, and outgoing connections came from the same source address as was assigned to the host.