Xarog, you are so full of it to say the least. Yes there are rational reasons to demand just that. We don't come up with supported theories by piecing together different experiments. Your way is the worse way of doing science.
1 + 2 + 3 + 4 = 10.
If you have the 1, the 2, the 3 and the 4, you can make the 10. If you think that's not valid science, then your definition of science is not something I wish to engage with.
As for your actual theory, there's nothing in your links to support it.
So you keep repeating, but I don't believe you.
You may think there is but you're mistaken as they make totally different points.
Ipse dixit.
I've been looking into epigenetics probably longer than you have and nothing you've presented is new to me.
Lol. Irrelevant.
Quite an exciting field as it can fill in quite a few gaps in how creatures adapt and possibly how they pass on adaptations and also to explain some diseases, but nothing in it to suggest a long term evolutionary path much less directed evolution functioning intelligently on its own. It's also not necessarily cause and effect. I've seen how genetic mutations can cause epigenetic changes so something to keep in mind when reading an article.
We both know you have an agenda when it comes to disbelief. And if genetic mutations did not cause epigenetic changes, the system couldn't work, lol.
Sign up with Google