IS gets 155Mbits fiber line :)

Cerberus

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2003
Messages
281
Reaction score
17
Location
.
Johannesburg, 14 January 2004] - Internet Solutions (IS) claims it will be the first Internet service provider (ISP) to use the 155Mbps STM1 line configuration. Telkom is supplying it with a broadband international private leased-line service on Afrolinque, the sub-marine fibre cable linking SA with Europe and the East.

"We are now in a position to offer our clients a faster and more reliable service than before," says Johann Pretorius, COO of Internet Solutions.

The Afrolinque cable links SA with West Africa and Europe through the SAT3/WASC portions, and with the East through the South Africa Far East (SAFE) portion of the cable. The contract for 155Mbps is valued at R270 million over three years.

The bandwidth will be taken up in two stages; currently in use are two each of 45Mbps, to Johannesburg and Cape Town respectively, with the remainder being deployed in April, to Johannesburg.

According to Pretorius, the reliability and speed of STM1 over the fibre cable will prove to be invaluable to Internet Solutions' more than 4 500 corporate customers, many of whom rely heavily on the Internet to transact business.

"[We] terminate in Cape Town and Johannesburg, which provides us with flexibility to configure our services according to traffic requirements. The fact that Telkom was able to build in backup through the SAFE portion of the cable, providing an alternative route via the East, has made our deal even more attractive," Pretorius adds.

"[This] product offers a lot of added value," says Wally Beelders, managing executive of Telkom International and Special Markets.

"The service is monitored 24 hours a day from our national network operations centre in Centurion. We act as a single point of contact, facilitating single-end ordering and billing, taking care of the service from SA to the terminating point, which in the case of Internet Solutions is in the US."

Don't know if this will affect Sentech in anyway we can hope.

Regards
Cerberus
 
<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"> The Afrolinque cable links SA with West Africa and Europe through the SAT3/WASC portions, and with the East through the South Africa Far East (SAFE) portion of the cable. The contract for 155Mbps is valued at R270 million over three years.
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">

Well that line can do 120Gbps and it cost like $600 million (R4800 million) to lay the cable and has over 25 years of life (not sure if it is the contract or the life of the cable). Now we have 155Mpbs over 3 years for R270 million. Now lets take that same speed over a 25 year period and we get to a hefty R2160 Million. Now with full capacity over 25Years it will be R16,722,580,654. That cable makes over R11.7 Billion. That excludes the maintenance of the cable but still, it is a lot[:p]

Somebody is making a lot of money and thats is not me


I say Lets burn them
 
you forget to mention that Telkom only owns I think 10Gb/s of the cable so you don't have 120gb/s but yes they are making lots of money but then maybe they will invest in another cable if they make enough:)

Regards
Cerberus
 
What is 155Mbps these days...? Nothing, so let's not get excited, it's all still going thru Telkom's underserviced, overpriced network.

Who the heck wants 155Mbps to Europe and Asia anyway? What we gonna download, sauerkraut and magic carpets?

<u>________________________________________________</u>
Just imagine where SA would be now if it weren't for Telkom
 
you always have to see the worst of everything in this ... let me tell you this if you have 155Mb/s dedicated in an ISP in the African countries it's allot and 2nd you could get allot of things via that route of the cable from say... california or chicago(middle of America) how you ask,well if you see on the cable itself it takes 42ms to get to Malaysia(no I'm not kidding) from there it hops onto another fiber connection(Sat3 is NOT the only way to get everywhere in the world) Then Malaysia routs it from there to Japan(world leader in internet speeds and connecetions) then hops to the USA now lets say that the hop from Malaysia to Japan is 42ms(will be less though but hey I'll give you that) and Japan to US is say double that or tirple... 150ms that gives you the ability of 250ms-300ms to the USA now from where I live here I don't get that kind of ping with my isdn I get around 350ms-400ms so please look at a map for cables and read how fast a signal travels on Sat3 to Malaysia it takes almost twice as long to get to the other end of Sat3 :)

Regards
Cerberus
 
Noag :
The R270 million is what IS is paying Telkom, I can assure you that Telkom is paying a lot less than that.

MaD :
155Mbps is a fair amount of bandwidth and can go a long way if managed properly. There is no point buying more than that if it will just be underutilised. Also on your other point just because the SAT-3/WASC/SAFE cable peers in the UK and Malaysia does not mean the content has to be in those countries. Both countries have HUGE amounts of bandwidth to the US so it really makes no difference routing information from the US via these countries.
 
I'm just against anything that has to do with Telkom... good one for IS but if 300 ADSL users are hammering at the network with Kazaa and the like the line is clogged.. but i'm wondering how Telkom can expect 300,000 DSL users when they have such hectic prices and r so stingy with their bandwidth? They're having trouble with just over 4,000 users so at their target they will have around 75 times more trouble. Should be interesting.

I'd like to drive over the guy who sets their prices.. prolly his name is Mark Upp.. lemme at 'im [:D]

<u>________________________________________________</u>
Just imagine where SA would be now if it weren't for Telkom
 
I believe just about everyone on this forum is against Telkom [;)]

The problem is that ADSL users are paying 100 times less for 512k than corporate clients are paying for 512k Diginet, therefore ADSL users get 100 times less priority on the network. Telkom have the bandwidth to support ADSL, they'd just rather use it for clients paying 100 times more.
 
lol@Mark Upp, but drive over him? That is a quick death, he should tortured for week[}:)]

The opposite of war is not peace, It's creation
Jonathan Larson Rent
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X