SuperNev
Well-Known Member
This probably belongs in the off-topic section, but what the heck ...
There's been outrage on the interwebs about "two sexist jokes" gone wrong at the 2013 PyCon. The full details have been reported here [theverge.com] and here [techcrunch.com] among others [Hacker News].
TL;DR
Two guys were talking about "forking someone's repo" as a new form of flattery (which I agree with), and in the same conversation made a childish joke about a "big dongle". A lady (Andria Richard) in front of them overheard the convo, and was offended. Instead of trying to tell them that their jokes aren't funny, she posted a picture of the guys on Twitter.
Both guys got fired at their jobs, and the interwebs have exploded, with Anonymous even chirping in, which got the lady fired too.
My question is really whether Git is sexist? As I mentioned above, I would be flattered if someone said they'd "fork my repo", even if I try get my head in the gutter I can't find how that would be offensive, except that the work "fork" might sound similar to the "f-word". There's been companies using it as "this is forking amazing" (I think it was bitbucket.org).
I do think that the lady took things out of context, I wouldn't be surprised if she didn't know what "forking" really is, and she just listened to key-words so she could have something to entertain her Twitter and Tumblr followers. She is a very active internet activist who's focused on women in programming.
Next time I'm with female colleagues at work I might feel insecure using words like "pulling", "pushing", "merging", "basing", "hard", "blaming" etc without fear of losing my job. e.g. can I "merge my repo with yours?", or even "wanna fork my repo?".
I just think that this activist has done harm to whatever her cause of being a female software evangelist. I do find humour though that it took a DDoS to get SendGrid to "release her" from her duties.
I wanna join Anonymous
There's been outrage on the interwebs about "two sexist jokes" gone wrong at the 2013 PyCon. The full details have been reported here [theverge.com] and here [techcrunch.com] among others [Hacker News].
TL;DR
Two guys were talking about "forking someone's repo" as a new form of flattery (which I agree with), and in the same conversation made a childish joke about a "big dongle". A lady (Andria Richard) in front of them overheard the convo, and was offended. Instead of trying to tell them that their jokes aren't funny, she posted a picture of the guys on Twitter.
Both guys got fired at their jobs, and the interwebs have exploded, with Anonymous even chirping in, which got the lady fired too.
My question is really whether Git is sexist? As I mentioned above, I would be flattered if someone said they'd "fork my repo", even if I try get my head in the gutter I can't find how that would be offensive, except that the work "fork" might sound similar to the "f-word". There's been companies using it as "this is forking amazing" (I think it was bitbucket.org).
I do think that the lady took things out of context, I wouldn't be surprised if she didn't know what "forking" really is, and she just listened to key-words so she could have something to entertain her Twitter and Tumblr followers. She is a very active internet activist who's focused on women in programming.
Next time I'm with female colleagues at work I might feel insecure using words like "pulling", "pushing", "merging", "basing", "hard", "blaming" etc without fear of losing my job. e.g. can I "merge my repo with yours?", or even "wanna fork my repo?".
I just think that this activist has done harm to whatever her cause of being a female software evangelist. I do find humour though that it took a DDoS to get SendGrid to "release her" from her duties.
I wanna join Anonymous