Is Iburst Throttling Bandwidth?

LoneGunman

Expert Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2003
Messages
4,552
Reaction score
3
Location
In The Shadow of Bush-lite: Obama
Okay this is just a thought, but I notice the basic end result of the 'problems' at iBurst being experienced by different folks, tend to mean a slower speed is experienced by users.

If the overall common experience of users = 'slow speeds' regardless of the different reasons and symptoms put forward by the Helpdesk to explain it, and also - given that this (including the disconnections) has now been going on for four days? A week? without that same frantic and visible activity by Luis, when facing earlier problems..

Then what about the theory that this is not 'a problem' but signs of conscious bandwidth throttling by iBurst?

The Sentech users among us will recall the various 'problems' that Sentech had - but they werent actual 'problems' - what they were, was simply signs of a network struggling with deliberately insufficient bandwidth being spread through it. End result: slower speeds for users. But as long as it was perceived as 'just a problem' by users, there was no overall sense of the real picture - namely that Sentech had deliberately made this occur.

So maybe from here on, this being Monday morning - its time to look past the signs of 'a supposed problem' and consider the idea that if it walks like a duck, talks like a duck and sounds like a duck - then its a duck.

ie: if some or most users are experiencing slow speeds, then perhaps this is exactly what iBurst want?

It could be useful for users to keep this idea in mind, when phoning the various techies and management people from today - because as long as we think and believe it is 'just a problem' - then we're not getting the overall big picture - that iBurst would appear to have deliberately throttled its available bandwidth.

And, like Sentech, they'll get away with it, until we all join the dots - and understand that this is perhaps a deliberate effect we're experiencing.

So - perhaps its actually not 'a problem' - but the end result of an iBurst decision viz the bandwidth..

I don't know. But if my speeds are now slower for the fourth day in a row, then rather than waste time complaining about a 'problem' as I was doing - I was losing sight of the ACTUAL reality as I'm experiencing it as an iBurst user - which is: 'iBurst seems to be throttling the bandwidth'
 
Lonegunman I hear you. I have been pondering this all weekend, but it makes no sense. Iburst advertises a capped service, do not implement the cap, attracts a lot of users who download like mad, you get hit with a big bandwidth bill by uunet, so what do you do - switch off the service and piss everyone off?????

Why dont you just implement the cap?????????

Surely they have the infrastructure in place to do it. The official launch is only a few weeks away.

On the other hand why the big secret about the problem. I am sure poor portia had a really bad day at the office.

"Yes the problem has been identified, no sorry i cant tell you what it is???? Do you want me to phone you when it is fixed??"

I loved that last one like i wont know when it is fixed????

Seeing as we all are guessing i will give a few more theories into the mix.

1)The authentification server problems was actually iburst installing a proxy which is misconfigured or unable to handle the load. Hence the **** service ever since.
2) Iburst are thinking of a uncapped but throttled package and decided to test that over the weekend. (Somehow i dont think so).
 
Then what about the theory that this is not 'a problem' but signs of conscious bandwidth throttling by iBurst?

Erm.... how about no? There was 20% packet loss as well, has nothing to do with the symptons on trafific shaping or port priortization. It was just really stupid technitians not knowing how to fix a problem
 
Chris

OK this weekend was the pits.... Slow as hell.

Called one of my mates on adsl 512.

We performed the same tasks on the web..

Guess what....

I out performed him by about 5 pages to his one displayed.

It seems this weekend had a total problem with bandwidth in the Joburg area.

Sorry guys at the help desk for blasting you....

Not your fault..

Keep up the good work. :)
 
I thought there was some throttling myself after not being able to connect or having sub 10 kB/s downloads. Then outta the blue I decided to put the firmware again on the UTD and switched it off for 30 mins or so. Et voila! Speeds up again, hell I even downloaded a 700 MB iso in 3 hrs.
 
As I've said in another post, the thing that makes me wonder whether LoneGunman may be at least partially correct is that my local is unaffected on Rosebank and Northcliff towers, yet international seems severely crippled.

International throttling anyone?


PS:
if (Impressed.comments.+ == 10 && Impressed.comments.- == 0){
Impressed = "Agent of iBurst";
}
 
I had the 20% packet loss problem this weekend.... Really annoying. Donkey slow. Really slow.
I got to work this morning and went online with Sentech 512k package. I was absolutely blown away by how it was pumping. We are talking 50kbytes/s. If I got over 8 kbytes/s this weekend I threw a party.

Here's the thing guys. I moved in with a buddy of mine this weekend. Were I was staying, I connected to Roodepoort Tower. Now It looks like I'm on Northcliff tower. WHAT A NASTY tower.
How the hell can you have 20% packet loss all the time. Not to mention no connection for about 2 hrs on Sat evening.... I am feeling your guys pain now...
 
Pan said:
Erm.... how about no? There was 20% packet loss as well, has nothing to do with the symptons on trafific shaping or port priortization. It was just really stupid technitians not knowing how to fix a problem
I think pan has the right path here. The packet loss is the cause of the speed loss. Why sudden packet loss though?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X