<blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by sgv-b</i>
<br />IS ADSL result:
Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=386ms TTL=50
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=452ms TTL=50
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=390ms TTL=50
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=374ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 374ms, Maximum = 452ms, Average = 400ms
<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"></font id="quote">
Thanks for that [

] Still getting better results with SAIX unshaped, though, which is a pity. I'm looking for an excuse to dump them, and I was hoping that IS would prove to have higher quality bandwidth, or even unshaped as standard. Doesn't seem to be the case (assuming that all is up and running as planned)
Pinging clarity.jolt.co.uk [195.149.21.11] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=55
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=55
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=267ms TTL=55
Reply from 195.149.21.11: bytes=32 time=268ms TTL=55
Ping statistics for 195.149.21.11:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 267ms, Maximum = 268ms, Average = 267ms