Is there a name for this coding technique/practice

[Solarion]

When I am quickly trying to put some results together on a form, I will sometimes just put SQL, parameters, sometimes hard code select statements inside the form itself just to pull a result and get the look and feel right.

After that I will separate the project into different sections, classes, db etc and make it more professional.

Does this type of coding have a name, getting it all together in one place asap.

 

[etienne_marais]

Roughly I would say Top Down with Refactoring

 

[Solarion]

Roughly I would say Top Down with Refactoring

Thanks Etienne I will go and read up more on it.

 

[mister]

After that I will separate the project into different sections, classes, db etc and make it more professional.

Lol... until you get too busy!

 

[patrick123]

In the older days there was the Warnier/Orr method which essentially looks at the reports or output that you are after then works backwards to define what inputs are required.

 

[Hamster]

POC?

 

[etienne_marais]

POC?

As in Proof Of Concept ? If you are trying to convince yourself I suppose

 

[FarligOpptreden]

Prototype?

 

[Hamster]

As in Proof Of Concept ? If you are trying to convince yourself I suppose

Well except for the stakeholders everything else making it a POC is there: crappy code, a big ball of spaghetti mess and Entity Framework.

 

[etienne_marais]

Prototype?

Nah, Prototype encapsulates state with an instance and gets to be re-used/cloned to avoid expensive operations.

 

[etienne_marais]

Well except for the stakeholders everything else making it a POC is there: crappy code, a big ball of spaghetti mess and Entity Framework.

Haha, yes. I suppose you deal with that a lot from juniors from what I gather.

 

[FarligOpptreden]

Nah, Prototype encapsulates state with an instance and gets to be re-used/cloned to avoid expensive operations.

Not really no. A prototype will more often than not be discarded after a first attempt, or it will be refactored, expanded and formalised into a fully functioning system.

Note that I'm refering to the practice of prototyping, not the design patten.

 

[etienne_marais]

Not really no. A prototype will more often than not be discarded after a first attempt, or it will be refactored, expanded and formalised into a fully functioning system.

Note that I'm refering to the practice of prototyping, not the design patten.

Ok, got you.

 

[rward]

POC?

 

[skimread]

Demo site?

 

[freddster]

Well except for the stakeholders everything else making it a POC is there: crappy code, a big ball of spaghetti mess and Entity Framework.

Some Italian Style Framework. Or TAT. Trial and Terror.

 

[Thor]

prototyping/testing/demo

 

[[)roi(]]

Prototype?

Yeah I'd call it either either a prototype or the term concept programming.

Either way it's an classic way to build something; prove a concept and then to refine (refactor)

 

[Solarion]

Demo site?

prototyping/testing/demo

Yeah I'd call it either either a prototype or the term concept programming.

Either way it's an classic way to build something; prove a concept and the refine (refactor)

All of the above especially this.

 

[Hamster]

Some Italian Style Framework. Or TAT. Trial and Terror.

LOL!!!!

/keeps for later