John Cusack Tells It Like It Is

empirex

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
2,518
Reaction score
0
Location
Cape Town
At least someone finally has the balls to say what many are thinking but don't have the guts to voice.
Filled with a sad but powerful truth.

What's worse? Bush's actions; or the sycophants who wilfully ignore the actions of a man who acts no different.

Certainly hope the last three sentences aren't true though..


John Cusack: 'Is Obama Just Another Ivy League A--hole?'

"Is the President just another Ivy League A--hole shredding civil liberties and due process and sending people to die in some s--thole for purely political reasons?"

So asked perilously liberal actor John Cusack Saturday in an article published by Truthout:

Mr. Obama, the Christian president with the Muslim-sounding name, would heed the admonitions of neither religion's prophets about making war and do what no empire or leader, including Alexander the Great, could do: he would, he assured us "get the job done in Afghanistan." And so we have our democratic president receiving the Nobel Peace Prize as he sends 30,000 more troops to a ten-year-old conflict in a country that's been war-torn for 5,000 years.

Why? We'll never fully know. Instead, we got a speech that was stone bull**** and an insult to the very idea of peace.

We can't have it both ways. Hope means endless war? Obama has metaphorically pushed all in with the usual international and institutional killers; and in the case of war and peace, literally.

To sum it up: more war. So thousands die or are maimed; generations of families and veterans are damaged beyond imagination; sons and daughters come home in rubber bags. But he and his satellites get their four more years.

Powerful stuff. Cusack even called out the media for their complicity:

Under Obama do we continue to call the thousands of mercenaries in Afghanistan "general contractors" now that Bush is gone? No, we don't talk about them... not a story anymore.

Nope, because such things under a Democratic president loved by the media are now ignored:

There will be a historical record. "Change we can believe in" is not using the other guys' mob to clean up your own tracks while continuing to feed at the trough. Human nature is human nature, and when people find out they're being hustled, they will seek revenge, sooner or later, and it will be ugly and savage.

In a country with desperation growing everywhere, everyday — despite the "Oh, things are getting better" press releases — how could one think otherwise?

Of course, despite any of his concerns, one can rest assured Cusack will still be voting for Obama in November.

As such, this entire exercise is to ease his conscience as he aids and abets the man doing these evil deeds.

Funny how that works, isn't it?
 
Bush's actions, certainly.

That's what you took out of that entire piece? So so so sad...
That was my commentary in a part rhetorical question on what John was reflecting upon in his article.
 
Last edited:
At least someone finally has the balls to say what many are thinking but don't have the guts to voice.
Filled with a sad but powerful truth.

What's worse? Bush's actions; or the sycophants who wilfully ignore the actions of a man who acts no different.

Certainly hope the last three sentences aren't true though..

Read it all... http://prophetofdoom.net/Good_Muslims_Osama_bin_Laden.Islam

War at home, or war in the home of your enemy? Which is better? Keeping the war in the enemy's home is always best. Even at great cost.

EDIT: Never forget, this is an eternal war.

2nd Edit: John Cusack should stick to trying to make people laugh. Bending over, will serve to have his **s **cked or head cut off. If I was Muslim. I'd cut his head off rather.
 
Last edited:
Read it all... http://prophetofdoom.net/Good_Muslims_Osama_bin_Laden.Islam

War at home, or war in the home of your enemy? Which is better? Keeping the war in the enemy's home is always best. Even at great cost.

EDIT: Never forget, this is an eternal war.

2nd Edit: John Cusack should stick to trying to make people laugh. Bending over, will serve to have his **s **cked or head cut off. If I was Muslim. I'd cut his head off rather.

Excuse my ignorance but what is an eternal war?
 
Eternal is different to perpetual in the wiki, eternal implies it won't end.

It won't end. Muslims cannot defeat the rest of humanity. They will try, by demographics, politics and war, but as a book I once read as a teenager, Dragon and Crystal, iirc, explained, religions attract people with a particular brain dominance, left or right brained.

He explained for instance, how Tao is right brained and Islam left brained. People are born with different dominance. Constantly. One religion, no matter which, can never rule the world. There will always be those that will oppose it. Always newborns, differing in opinion.
 
Last edited:
It won't end. Muslims cannot defeat the rest of humanity. They will try, by demographics, politics and war, but as a book I once read as a teenager, Dragon and Crystal, iirc, explained, religions attract people with a particular brain dominance, left or right brained.

He explained for instance, how Tao is right brained and Islam left brained. People are born with different dominance. Constantly. One religion, no matter which, can never rule the world. There will always be those that will oppose it. Always newborns, differing in opinion.


But it can be infiltrated oops I mean freed from tyrany:)
 
At least someone finally has the balls to say what many are thinking but don't have the guts to voice.
Filled with a sad but powerful truth.
About as underwhelming as dirty Harry's stab at Obama.
 
About as underwhelming as dirty Harry's stab at Obama.

I think your browser is faulty. Here, I've quoted the bits that you seem to be missing..


Is the President just another Ivy League A--hole shredding civil liberties and due process and sending people to die in some s--thole for purely political reasons?

he would, he assured us "get the job done in Afghanistan." And so we have our democratic president receiving the Nobel Peace Prize as he sends 30,000 more troops to a ten-year-old conflict in a country that's been war-torn for 5,000 years.

Why? We'll never fully know. Instead, we got a speech that was stone bull**** and an insult to the very idea of peace.

We can't have it both ways. Hope means endless war? Obama has metaphorically pushed all in with the usual international and institutional killers; and in the case of war and peace, literally.

To sum it up: more war. So thousands die or are maimed; generations of families and veterans are damaged beyond imagination; sons and daughters come home in rubber bags[/B]. But he and his satellites get their four more years.

Under Obama do we continue to call the thousands of mercenaries in Afghanistan "general contractors" now that Bush is gone? No, we don't talk about them... not a story anymore.

There will be a historical record. "Change we can believe in" is not using the other guys' mob to clean up your own tracks while continuing to feed at the trough. Human nature is human nature, and when people find out they're being hustled, they will seek revenge, sooner or later, and it will be ugly and savage.
 
About as underwhelming as dirty Harry's stab at Obama.

Haha true. Eva Longoria is set to speak at the DNC.

I hope no Dems take the pi.ss outta old Clint, they'd be crucified in the press.
 
I think your browser is faulty. Here, I've quoted the bits that you seem to be missing..

Yeah - still blaming Obama for the mess he inherited from old W. The mark of failure right there.
 
Yeah - still blaming Obama for the mess he inherited from old W. The mark of failure right there.

More war, more funds being pumped into gitmo, more drone strikes on innocent people and sovereign countries, more troops sent to Afghanistan, more troops being sent into Africa via AFRICOM, is not inherited.

Can you not see that Obama's rhetoric is Bush's rhetoric?
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X