SauRoNZA
Honorary Master
Only a bad idea if you the rich partner.
Or unwilling to share.
The moment you are willing to share wholeheartedly you can put in a much better team effort and actually generate more wealth through transparency.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Only a bad idea if you the rich partner.
Or unwilling to share.
The moment you are willing to share wholeheartedly you can put in a much better team effort and actually generate more wealth through transparency.
I personally don't have life insurance other than the group policy set up by my employer. For various reasons which aren't really relevant here.There is insurance specifically for this purpose that should be part of your death benefits.
It's a sum of money that pays out within 24 hours of death to tide people over during the account freeze stage.
A good broker would have set this up for you.
It's not a problem. It gets attributed evenly the same as when you're married in community of property.Problem you have with a joint account is from a reporting and tax perspective.
How does the bank generate an IT3(b), how would it know who to attribute what portion of interest to each individual .. make sense?
Please shareI personally don't have life insurance other than the group policy set up by my employer. For various reasons which aren't really relevant here.
But yeah, agreed, that should be a factor to consider.
Who keeps enough money in bank account for the other spouse to worry about money in the event of your death anyway? Your main (in my case cheque) account only has the most money in it when I get paid, next day is my bond and all savings, investments and insurance debit orders. The following day there's only my gadget, beer and side-chick's blessing money left.The only reason is in the event of the account holder's death, and the account is frozen while estate is wound up.
Mostly, we have no dependants (yet - this may change in coming weeks), and my wife is capable of looking after herself for the rest of her life, she can get back into the labour pool easily enough.Please share
Main reason people still take out life insurance is it's tax free. Money you've invested still forms part of inheritance tax.Mostly, we have no dependants (yet - this may change in coming weeks), and my wife is capable of looking after herself for the rest of her life, she can get back into the labour pool easily enough.
Insurance is a gamble. If you end up not needing it, it's a bit of a waste. I rather invest what I would have put on life insurance, so that after a long career there can actually be something to enjoy.
If I had many children and a wife who wouldn't be able to find a job for herself, then I might think differently though.
I was kind of talking about if I don't die though. I can still enjoy my investments then. Doesn't really help me much if I outlive the life insurance and then don't get to enjoy any of the money.Main reason people still take out life insurance is it's tax free. Money you've invested still forms part of inheritance tax.