Just a FUNNY thing!!! (iBurst)

Okay Steve, I laughed through you post, but only because you wrote it for noone... da dum dish :)

If you've ever googled for information and saw the postings of other people, you'll find a "promising link" and find 20-30 people asking the same freaking question.

The REASON why I posted a flame instead of a "aw, shame, here is how you could solve the problem" is simply because Source was an outright dumbass to even do what he did before even consulting a forum like this to ask what his options were and to ask what everyone else's opinion was on IF he did infact do what he did, how he should do it and what are the problem areas some people would experience with this, aka, ****ing up the PC Board.

But, he didn't, thus my insult. You must be the same type of idiot (I now dub thee, stoooopid) as sometimes I'm an idiot as well, but one who would do actual research on what I am thinking about doing BEFORE doing it.

Sometimes I'll **** something up because I don't mind learning from my mistakes, but I make a point of it to learn from others mistakes (or try to) BEFORE venturing out on my own and doing things "my way"

I design system processes and CRM systems (as well as B2B) software for a living, and trust me, just by looking at other people's mistakes, I can roll out a kick ass flexible robust system in less time you take to equate pi.

So like I said, I hate idiots like you and Source who has too much money lying around ****ing things up. The fact that Source has a Sentech 512k connection and chose to **** up a beautiful service like iBurst rather only goes to show the extent of his idiotic behavior in general.

By you sticking up for him (and I might add, you have a very good point, but like I explained, Source already commited the act of idiocy and should be hammered for it) you prove to me that "birds of a feather stick together" and that by combining the IQ of both you and Source would infact give a null reference exception while trying to calculate it.

I might be lame in my own right, I might be insane, I might be brilliant, I might be a hot lesbian chick who sometimes like experimenting with guys. That has nothing to do with the fact that both you and Source has contributed to the whole declination of intelligence in this forum.
 
Um - but are you a "hot lesbian chick who sometimes like experimenting with guys" ?
Seriously.
Cos that would explain the "Have to get the last word in" thing of yours.
* Giggle *
This is just so much fun - more more more ...
 
Thank You

Noone the point remains that prior to my dissing you, you dissed source, and in a most lame and pathetic way. And if I had not posted what I did (which was off topic - sorry ic, but remember that your response in supprt of noone was off topic too) that would have been that.

But noone, now you have been afforded the wonderful opportunity of time to actually think before you commit to text, you have retorted in a way that makes you look like a sensible and meaningful human being... which I'm sure sometimes you are.

And from this little flame, hopefully you will continue to be that nice person.

But based on your explanation for your diss on source, I think you need to realise that solutions do not materialise from a singular approach, you sound very much like a 'yes man' technician one that follows a time proven approach, one that thinks according to what others say, one that does his 'research' by asking others prior to making a decision... but noone who first discovered those solutions if not the guy that got out the soldering iron and tried something that didn't work and then CONTRIBUTED to a forum which you dissed??

Sorry ic I know this is totally off thread so if you want to start a new topic about this whole subject let's jump right in.

Oh, by the way lesbians do not have any desire for men on the side, just the same way that gay men do not have any desire for women on the side.

If they DO swing both ways they're pretty happy to admit that they're bi okay (and they will tell you this at any opportunity), so sorry to spoil your very 1980's machismo illusions, but that's just the way it is
 
What support?

Ahhh...the power of hitting the Edit button & deleting one's own posts, almost like time travel...

PS: Did I mention that I actually have oily duck feathers protruding from my back? So, no need to apologise, I just wanted to point out that sometimes wars are best conducted in the linen cupboard:)
 
Last edited:
And Steve would know about the whole lesbian/gay thing wont you :)

I'm not the lead programmer for nothing. Innovation and "out of the box" thinking is what comes naturally to me.

However, there's a big difference between being innovative and stupid.
 
Empathetic

Yup noone on the subject of gay/lesbian affairs, even though I am straight and happily married with two lovely little boys, who may or may not turn out to be gay, I believe I do have some understanding.

On the subject of people being flamed unnecessarily I also believe I have some understanding.

On the subject of being called 'stoopid' (sp?) by a person like yourself I pretty damn well understand. In fact I expect to be called stoopid (sp?) by your sort, because if you and I were on a level, I'd be just as stupid as yourself.

Why? Because I am empathetic.

As the head of some team I'm sure you're familiar with that term.

And on the subject of Source's original post, I admit to not have contributed anything, which is why I realise I now need to bow out and say my goodbyes in this regard.

So, in the spirit of a decent disagreement, "last comments please gentlemen..."

signing out ... (But I may be back with some dumb question for noone to diss)
 
Dumb questions are always welcome and I usually try to help where I can, especially when I know the answer.

"Stoopid" have been spelt incorrectly for reason of not being able to vocalize any response I might have. If you've ever watched Animaniacs, you'll get what I mean by spelling it "Stoopid"

Being empathetic is nice... but in the end, empathy for someone or something can drain you in ways you cannot understand. The words "soul suckers" comes to mind.

Like I said in a previous post. If he ASKED a dumb question re: The whole soldering issue, instead of asking how to fix his now ****ed up modem, he would have gotten a response a long the lines of "The connector is of x type which you can person from person y which will cost you around z, the antennae is 1.8ghz and you can go to www.blabla.com to look for more information on your query, otherwise just google it, you're bound to find something"

Yet, because of his idiotic behaviour and false "innovation" and not talking to anyone before helping his modem commit suicide (poor thing couldn't defend itself! <-- see EMPATHY) led to this slew of posts.

I felt it nessacary to flame. I'll kick anyone working under me in the nuts if they dropped a production database table just because "they didn't know what it would do but tried anyway because they wanted to learn"

You might be suprised how much a simple question can save you in time and money. Then again, the super rich dont care
 
lol this is classic, I see only 2 kinds of people listed in this thread.

1.) The Brave (Source)

and

2.) The Geek (noone, cause for christ sake only a true living geek would bring a IQ wrestling match into such a stupid thread)

I rest my case.
 
Hey, being a geek is "in" these days. Women love us because we pull the cash yo :)
 
"Ignore people like noone"

What are you really trying to say? That he should ignore no one or he should ignore no one?

I dont get it...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X