Praeses
Expert Member
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2005
- Messages
- 4,932
So you've ignored this part of my post: "Dude even if the yeast retained elements of multicellularity and therefore had a smaller barrier to overcome to develop multicellularity it still demonstrates that the jump to multicellularity from unicellularity could be much easier than we ever thought. The claims of preadaptation are for sure something to consider but they don't change that evolution has occurred here and those changes have resulted in a shift from unicellular behaviour to multicellular behaviour."
Sorry about missing that part. I have sinusitis so my brain feels all clogged
The cells didn't retain elements of multicellular behaviour, it's still part of their life cycle. The title reads "evolutionary leap" which it isn't. Selective pressure can be applied in so many ways e.g. increasing antibiotic resistance etc. Nobody ever claims it to be an evolutionary leap.
Selective pressure...and I had a citrate growing E. coli before they did the article, and I never use citrate in my growth mediums besides for a citrate test.You basically just reworded it using E. coli and citrate. The ability to grow on citrate WAS developed.
Gene regulation can be tricky. Mutations happen all the time, creating artificial selective pressure will logically select for specific mutants. Sure, it's evolving/changing, but it's nothing to write home about.Sure there may have been portions of it still hanging around but it STILL evolved. To then claim that people are trying to "see evolution everywhere" as though there isn't evolution occurring there makes me go :wtf:.