battletoad
Expert Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2009
- Messages
- 1,461
- Reaction score
- 52
I've developed an app in my free time. I will be sitting down with my employers to see if said app can be implemented within the organisation (with a financial incentive for me of course).
The kicker is that, I'm told, whatever an employee develops is automatically owned by the organisation since they assume you will be using their resources. However, if you can prove none of their resources were used (how this is done I have no idea), then there is no issue and whatever you develop is yours. Since I did it in my spare time, I trust I have no issue here.
Furthermore, I am not a developer as far as my job description goes, i.e. afaik nothing in my contract states that whatever I develop is theirs. However, my app will make my job easier.
To make a long story short, I have no idea how to write a software license, or what constitutes a fair license for both parties. How would I word:
1. Even though I use your resources for my demonstration, e.g. your network, this application is still mine.
2. Whatever changes you request to be made to said app, the app is still mine. Reason I prefer this is that if they provided some ideas for the app, they cannot now claim they provided a resource and by extension the app is now theirs. Tbh I'm a bit two-minded about this one.
I simply want to protect myself, and if any commercial ventures can be implemented then I want to be a part of the process.
Any other tips/experiences would be appreciated.
EDIT: if one of those standard apache/lgpl/etc. licenses suffices which would it be?
The kicker is that, I'm told, whatever an employee develops is automatically owned by the organisation since they assume you will be using their resources. However, if you can prove none of their resources were used (how this is done I have no idea), then there is no issue and whatever you develop is yours. Since I did it in my spare time, I trust I have no issue here.
Furthermore, I am not a developer as far as my job description goes, i.e. afaik nothing in my contract states that whatever I develop is theirs. However, my app will make my job easier.
To make a long story short, I have no idea how to write a software license, or what constitutes a fair license for both parties. How would I word:
1. Even though I use your resources for my demonstration, e.g. your network, this application is still mine.
2. Whatever changes you request to be made to said app, the app is still mine. Reason I prefer this is that if they provided some ideas for the app, they cannot now claim they provided a resource and by extension the app is now theirs. Tbh I'm a bit two-minded about this one.
I simply want to protect myself, and if any commercial ventures can be implemented then I want to be a part of the process.
Any other tips/experiences would be appreciated.
EDIT: if one of those standard apache/lgpl/etc. licenses suffices which would it be?
Last edited: