The point behind a forum is to post topics, and receive responses.
Chastising me for wasting 200 bytes in a post is not helpful.
The point behind an FAQ is to list frequently asked questions, and be a knowledge base.
Perhaps we should start an FAQ thread so that these things can be listed with common knowledge gleaned from the discussions, and sticky it at the top.
Also, I asked if anyone has actually attempted it under Linux, which I'm taking by the response, and the other thread, no-one has yet...
As of yet, there is no evidence that it will actually look like a PPPoE device, even with the ethernet cable, or for that matter that Roaring Penguin's ppoe client will work with it...
From what I've been able to figure is that the signup process, and authentication process might be quite proprietary, which could spell bad news for Linux attempts.
Some good news would be for example, if someone that has used it on ethernet, with WindowsXP, has detected the modem on their network as a PPPoE device. If windows XP out of the box will see it, then chances are good it will work with standard authentication and discovery protocols over ethernet.
I don't have much hope for USB support under Linux, so I'm pretty much prepared to go have to buy the Ethernet cable. The question is, does it really appear like stock PPPoE device?