Lufthansa splits big order between Boeing, Airbus

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,514
Reaction score
10,088
Location
District 9
German airline Lufthansa is ordering 34 new jets from Boeing and 25 from European rival Airbus as it updates its long-haul fleet to make it more fuel efficient and lower costs.

Lufthansa said the orders were worth 14 billion euros ($19 billion) at list prices.

The 777-9X jets from Chicago-headquartered Boeing Co. and the Airbus A350-900 models will begin being delivered in 2016. They will replace older aircraft such as Boeing 747-400s and Airbus A340-300s. The 777-9X family is to launch later this year and enter service around the end of the decade, Boeing says.

Lufthansa said it was taking options to buy more planes if its business needs demanded it. Airbus, based in Toulouse, France, said Lufthansa had options to buy 30 more of the planes.

The company said the new planes will make its fleet more fuel-efficient and quieter as well as improve passenger comfort with wider cabins. CEO Christoph Franz said that the order "enabled a quantum leap in efficiency."

Lufthansa AG is facing tough competition from Middle Eastern airlines on long-haul routes between Europe and Asia, as well as competition from low-cost airlines on shorter routes. Aircraft noise has been a political and legal issue at the airline's Frankfurt hub, where some residents have complained about the impact of new runways.

The airline says the new planes use an average 2.9 liters of jet fuel to fly a passenger 100 kilometers - lower than the current fuel mileage figure for the company's long haul fleet of 3.58 liters per 100 kilometers per passenger.

The company recorded a net loss of 204 million euros ($270.01 million) in the first six months of the year as restructuring costs, fuel prices and slower business in Asia and the Middle East sapped earnings.

Its shares rose 1 percent to 13.98 euros in midday trading in Frankfurt.


Source : Sapa-AP /sdv
Date : 19 Sep 2013 16:26
 
2.9l to fly a passenger 100km? Is it me or does that seem very very little fuel? I suppose it has to do with the amount of passengers per load ... but wow.
 
2.9l to fly a passenger 100km? Is it me or does that seem very very little fuel? I suppose it has to do with the amount of passengers per load ... but wow.

Of course it has to do with the number of passengers per load.
 
2.9l to fly a passenger 100km? Is it me or does that seem very very little fuel? I suppose it has to do with the amount of passengers per load ... but wow.

Does not seem like that little considering the 777-9X seats about 400 people, 2.9x400=1160l per 100km but then again these aluminium budgies can hold close to 200 kilo litres of fuel. Imaging stopping at the garage and filling up a tank that size :D
 
Does not seem like that little considering the 777-9X seats about 400 people, 2.9x400=1160l per 100km but then again these aluminium budgies can hold close to 200 kilo litres of fuel. Imaging stopping at the garage and filling up a tank that size :D

Well .... I see it as 4 coke bottles ... to me that is very little. I never thought of it in this way of how many litres per 100 km per head of cattle :D

For some reason I always imagined one of those engines sucking up a entire bath tub of fuel per second .... stupid I know but ja ... there you go:o
 
For some reason I always imagined one of those engines sucking up a entire bath tub of fuel per second
Using figures mentioned in the discussion and a rather high cruising speed of 840km/h (thumbsuck to give nice round numbers), a quick mental calculation gives me roughly 1.5 liters of fuel per second per engine ... unless my arithmetic is totally fubar that really sounds amazingly low considering the size of those puppies.

I can well imagine a 60s / 70s fighter jet in full afterburner slurping a bath tub full of fuel every second :p
 
For some reason I always imagined one of those engines sucking up a entire bath tub of fuel per second .... stupid I know but ja ... there you go:o

777 guzzles about a litre per second per engine, can you keep up chucking coke bottles that fast? :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X