Carlhead
Expert Member
It could be a difference in the distro couldnt it? I've only used it with Ubuntu.
Don't think so, we're using Debian Sarge at that client.
Redhat ES3 & 4 and Debian Dapper Drake at other clients.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
It could be a difference in the distro couldnt it? I've only used it with Ubuntu.
You're the first person I've ever heard complain about build quality and considering you can easily triple boot OsX, Windoze, and Linux I've got to wonder what your software is that it wont run on any of those operating systems.
Sure - its a premium machine - similarly priced to Dells these days and you get what you pay for.Software-wise, I'd be talking OsX. If I wanted a Windows machine, I sure as hell would not pay a fat premium for Apple hardware.
Using Parallels most windows software can be run within OsX - who knows what hardware you're talking about so I'm not even going to hazard a guess. From what I've see hardware compatibility has rarely been a problem.Never mind software - OsX probably wouldn't support half my peripherals properly.
Depends what you want to do with it.is the performance on the mac worth it?
Sure - its a premium machine - similarly priced to Dells these days and you get what you pay for.
Using Parallels most windows software can be run within OsX - who knows what hardware you're talking about so I'm not even going to hazard a guess. From what I've see hardware compatibility has rarely been a problem.
Sure - its a premium machine - similarly priced to Dells these days and you get what you pay for.Using Parallels most windows software can be run within OsX - who knows what hardware you're talking about so I'm not even going to hazard a guess. From what I've see hardware compatibility has rarely been a problem.Depends what you want to do with it.
The macs are so irratating, where the PC's can just browse to the Linux box on the network and see all the shares... With the damn Apples you have to use "Go" "connect to server" then if you don't use smb://servername/share then they can only see the private home directory and no other shares.
I have no problems with the build quality, just their styling.
Software-wise, I'd be talking OsX. If I wanted a Windows machine, I sure as hell would not pay a fat premium for Apple hardware.
Never mind software - OsX probably wouldn't support half my peripherals properly.
when i one buy i don't want it to hang it's really irritating
Now if you don't like the styling on a mac, you must be severely fashion challenged.
Very few PC's come even close to the combination of form factor and functionality that a mac offers.
The premium is not that fat at all... try doing a like for like spec comparison, and don't forget to add the price of a "works" package and dvd authoring into the mix.
IMHO that's as difficult as it gets... once you've setup a share it never drops and the mac always remembers where it is.
I've got a samba drive designated as my safari download directory. When the share is not connected and I begin a download - OS X reconnects to the share and my download begins seemlessly.
On the other hand my windoze machines constantly drop the samba connection, usually during file transfer and definitely aren't smart enough to reconnect, they just come up with drive could not be found.
Now if you don't like the styling on a mac, you must be severely fashion challenged.
Very few PC's come even close to the combination of form factor and functionality that a mac offers.
The premium is not that fat at all... try doing a like for like spec comparison, and don't forget to add the price of a "works" package and dvd authoring into the mix.
Most macs are fully loaded... and I haven't got any peripherals that don't work on a mac, if anything its been easier to connect them.
Ah the infamous blue screen of death and three finger salute... my macs almost never crash bringing the entire system down... maybe once or twice a year and generally only on beta software.
On the rare occasions that a app freezes, you can quit and relaunch and you don't lose any data.
I find a reboot my windoze machine more in a day than I do the mac in a quarter.
And you were doing so well and then you go and utter such BS...however Windoze will reboot for updates totally randomly, and irrelevant of what you were in the middle of or how important it was.
Windows updates especially love it when you have loads of work open, it secretly watches and waits for you to turn you back then annihilates everything that is open without any chance of saving anything.![]()
There was a story on Digg just the other day where this happened to a guy and from the comments it wasnt an isolated occurrence.No man, come on now, obviously you havent set the updates schedule and actions correctly...
What you describe has never happened to me, in my personal or professional experience
again![]()
And you were doing so well and then you go and utter such BS...
No man, come on now, obviously you havent set the updates schedule and actions correctly...
What you describe has never happened to me, in my personal or professional experience
again![]()
Gotta link for me? Would like to see what the scenario was.There was a story on Digg just the other day where this happened to a guy and from the comments it wasnt an isolated occurrence.
You had to say it didn't you...if you tell it to download and install updates automatically it will reboot your machine automatically to.
Gotta link for me? Would like to see what the scenario was.
You had to say it didn't you...
The key word I believe here is automatically... which YOU told it to do....
That is NOT the only option you know.
You must be crazy to allow MS to do stuff automatically to your PC... wtf dude??
double
![]()
The point is this wont happen to educated users but I guess that is also a completely different subject for another thread...So you mean users have to magically know to not use the **highly recommended** settings that MS sugests??
It's just poor OS design, was my point.
The point is this wont happen to educated users but I guess that is also a completely different subject for another thread...![]()
If you trust any partner / vendor / manufacturer / company when they say ***highly recommended*** without finding out the exact ramifications, be prepared for some disillusionment
This is becoming a bit of he said - she said...
I've found a mac to be a much better quality product with a superior user experience, plus they look real good
I've also found that a lot of PC users have (poor) opinions about the machines without ever having seen, nevermind used one.
In the end it comes down to personal choice... and some common sense. If you want a computer for hardcore gaming... get a PC. If you need one for pretty much everything else or you want to get your grandma computer literate... get a mac.