South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Potentially yes. I had a chemistry teacher who barely knew any chemistry. That nearly brought me down. I had to teach myself and there was another teacher willing to take the time to answer my questions (and he knew chemistry). I survived that because my parents bought me any additional materials I requested (today it would have been incredibly easy with the internet). Still knocked on to subsequent school years (where I had a far better teacher). I had a mathematics teacher who was completely lazy - her teaching consisted of coming into the classroom, telling us to read x pages, then do examples. Many of us suffered a serious hit to our marks that year, and some of that stuff was core material that was needed for subsequent years right into first year university. And therein lies the big issue. Subjects like mathematics, chemistry and physics rely on an understanding of earlier material to continue. You screw these children over early on and they're carrying a deficit every year. Do it multiple years and chances are they'll never even understand the relatively simple mathematics taught at school. And most of these children don't have parents who can help them either with materials or knowledge (I could pick up a school mathematics textbook, learn the material and then assist my child).I am also sensitive to teaching ability, but would a bad maths teacher lead to a fail for the whole class? The performance of so many matrics indicates a bigger problem that cannot totally be attributed to just some bad teachers.