Mikrotik help, anyone?

No luck. Can't even net boot the thing since it expects the pc to be on eth1,and the cpu receives no traffic from those ports :-(
I think this ****er is doa. I imagine I'll have to ship it back...
 
Sinbad said:
No luck. Can't even net boot the thing since it expects the pc to be on eth1,and the cpu receives no traffic from those ports :-(
I think this ****er is doa. I imagine I'll have to ship it back...
Click to expand...

Probably is DOA...what your firewall and mangle rules look like ?
 
Could be something with the bridge. I have a similar setup RB2011UAS with ADSL on ether10.




Flags: X - disabled, R - running
0 R name="bridge1" mtu=1500 l2mtu=2028 arp=proxy-arp
mac-address=D4:CA:6D:97:6B:4E protocol-mode=none priority=0x8000
auto-mac=yes admin-mac=00:00:00:00:00:00 max-message-age=20s
forward-delay=15s transmit-hold-count=6 ageing-time=5m



Main difference is l2mtu and arp=proxy-arp
 
Why are the vlan id's on the 1gb ports set to auto and the 100mb to 0? I think you should set them all to 0.
 
aug/28/2014 13:12:12 system,error,critical login failure for user support from 112.66.190.249 via telnet
Click to expand...

Oh and you may want to review your firewall rules and/or make sure you have a strong password ;)
 
Sinbad reset the mikrotik with the command: system reset no defaults=yes

This will remove that crap slave master setup. Then add a bridge, with ports 1-9 added to the bridge. Add an ip to the bridge, dhcp server, ip pool. Then use ether10 for the pppoe client for the adsl modem, add default route as ticked and use peer dns as ticked. Then add a src nat masquarade rule and it should all be working.
 
paul5186 said:
Sinbad reset the mikrotik with the command: system reset no defaults=yes

This will remove that crap slave master setup. Then add a bridge, with ports 1-9 added to the bridge. Add an ip to the bridge, dhcp server, ip pool. Then use ether10 for the pppoe client for the adsl modem, add default route as ticked and use peer dns as ticked. Then add a src nat masquarade rule and it should all be working.
Click to expand...

My config is OK with everything except the gig ports. WLAN clients and 100mb clients can see the internet fine.
The problem is the cpu does not receive any traffic from the gig ports at all. Even with a blank config.


(yes, I changed the password ;))

When I try and ping a machine on a gig port from a machine on the 100mb ports, I can see the arp requests going out the gig port via torch, but I never see any replies come in. I only ever see tx packets.
Tried with multiple cables and multiple PCs.

The master/slave setup isn't crap - you need it to do wire-speed switching.
 
nand said:
Yea, this will probably fix the problem.
Click to expand...

I see the arp packets going out the gig ports but nothing coming in ... If there was a vlan issue, the arp packets would stay on their own vlan.

Even a netinstall didn't work - since it runs off the gigabit portion of the switch, and the bootp requests never get an answer from netinstall.
 
Sinbad said:
My config is OK with everything except the gig ports. WLAN clients and 100mb clients can see the internet fine.
The problem is the cpu does not receive any traffic from the gig ports at all. Even with a blank config.


(yes, I changed the password ;))

When I try and ping a machine on a gig port from a machine on the 100mb ports, I can see the arp requests going out the gig port via torch, but I never see any replies come in. I only ever see tx packets.
Tried with multiple cables and multiple PCs.

The master/slave setup isn't crap - you need it to do wire-speed switching.
Click to expand...
Well the 2011 has two separate switch banks. Maybe the one is stuffed. So you cannot even mac winbox to it via a gb port with no config?
 
paul5186 said:
Well the 2011 has two separate switch banks. Maybe the one is stuffed. So you cannot even mac winbox to it via a gb port with no config?
Click to expand...

Correct. Can only winbox on a 100mb port. I think the gig switch chip is farked.
 
and the worst is I imported this, so I suspect i'm gonna have to courier it back to bloody latvia :/
 
Sinbad said:
Nope. Packets don't reach the bridge from the gig ports at all.
No firewall or mangle rules.
Click to expand...

Sorry I mean instead of bridging just manually route the traffic over. So have 2 separate subnets ( wlan and 100mb ports on a large range then gb ports on say a /28 ) then just static route.

I've had endless problems with 2011's and imho can be thrown in the same pile as mikrotiks ros... constantly broken.
 
acidrain said:
Sorry I mean instead of bridging just manually route the traffic over. So have 2 separate subnets ( wlan and 100mb ports on a large range then gb ports on say a /28 ) then just static route.
Click to expand...

Traffic entering the GB ports does not reach the cpu at all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X