Nikon 18-200mm vr

GTi

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
3,826
I am also looking at this lens but the price is insane for me (very amateur).
I see the Sigma is about 1/3 of the price, will a amateur with a d3100 notice the difference?

I have both these lenses, they are not worlds apart, they both have their pros & cons.

Here's a comparison:

http://www.digitalreview.ca/content/Nikon-AFS-18-200mm-VR-II-compared-to-Sigma-DC-OS-HSM-zoom.shtml

I have the Sigma 1 up for grab.

http://mybroadband.co.za/classified...-200mm-f-2f3-5-6-3-dc-os-hsmnikon-mount&cat=4
 

GTi

Expert Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
3,826
Yes, there usually is a noticeable difference in quality between a cheap Sigma or Tamron lens and a much more expensive Nikkor or Canon equivalent lens.
However Sigma do make some decent lenses so it's worth looking for some reviews and comparisons online.
For an amateur you might not mind the lower quality lens.
Barrel distortion for example isn't always that easy to spot unless you're taking photos of geometric shapes like buildings, straight lines, etc.
Chromatic aberration (purple fringing) on the other hand is very easy to spot.

The other thing to worry about is lens and camera body compatibility.
I'm not sure if the Sigma/Nikon lens combo's are as much of a problem as the Sigma/Canon combo's but the problem is if you upgrade your camera body you have no guarantee that the lens will continue to work correctly on the new body.
The main issue seems to be that the auto focus stops working. If future compatibility is not a concern to you then best thing to do is take your camera body with you when you go shopping for lenses and try them out on the body to make sure they perform as expected.

Only Canon has this issues with the Sigma attachments, they work 100% on a Nikon mount.
 

Brawler

Honorary Master
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
11,472
Trying to scrape together the funds to buy GTi's sigma - really like the idea of that lens for everyday use.
 
Top