Nikon D5500

PostmanPot

Honorary Master
Joined
Jul 16, 2005
Messages
35,014
Reaction score
81
Location
Cape Town
http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/dslr-cameras/D5500.html

Anyone seen or used this? The new Nikon D5500 looks to be a game changer.

One of the main features is the 3.2" tilt/swivel touch screen, which also allows controlling the camera through the viewfinder, as well as tap to focus in live view mode! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxhEk22uUQQ

(Edit: It's more the overall package, features and size that is a game changer ;))

It's all all packed into a body smaller and lighter than Nikon's entry level D3200.

A while back I got rid of my Nikon D40 and 18-135mm, my iPhone did most of what I needed and I was prepared to bridge the gap and not have to carry around a big camera and lens. The iPhone's consistently good results, especially in low light, meant a lot for me, and since pics are mainly going to Instagram, any extra noise or poor low light performance isn't much of a concern, the grain even adding pleasing effects.

http://i.imgur.com/SgK6PDgl.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/gN6kcjql.jpg
http://i.imgur.com/EUJuU6ml.png

But there are times I do miss my DSLR, especially low light conditions and low light landscapes, and of course a bit of zoom. I really missed it during these fires.

The D5500 ticks all the boxes for me, the only nice to have would have been in-built GPS (although this hampers battery life when enabled, and I could get a GPS attachment). It also doesn't seem to have a proper in-camera HDR setting, which is the main negative for me.

After looking at the D7200 and even D610 FX, I actually prefer the sounds of the D5500, particularly the swivel and touch screen lending itself to more creativity, which will allow me to spend more on lenses. I'm thinking a Sigma/Tamron/Tokina 10-20mm, Nikkor 35mm, and then a Nikkor macro (would love the 105mm...).

Your thoughts? Nothing from Canon seems to come close, and Nikons take nicer photos, last longer, and have longer warranties. I was very keen on a Canon, but I just can't.
 
Last edited:
The new Nikon D5500 looks to be a game changer.
Maybe you want to go into what's game changing about it? Everyone seems to be coming out with swivel touch screens these days.
 
Maybe you want to go into what's game changing about it? Everyone seems to be coming out with swivel touch screens these days.

Please list the Canon entry/prosumer cameras with swivel screens and live view tap to focus?

I spent a lot of time comparing, may have missed one or two models.

It was more than just the swivel/tap to focus, which led me to feel the D5500's a game changer.
 
Might need to consider the 70D a bit more, many pros over the D5500, but bigger and older, lesser shutter life span and warranty. The size of the D5500 is very appealing, having originally steered away from DSLR due to bulkiness. That's part of the game changer, to me.
 
Pretty torn, the 70D is an older better camera, but the D5500 is a newer more practical camera with a lot of assistive features.

I was never unhappy with my 6MP D40 and would prefer to put money into glass.

Nikons feel better in my hand, I'm more used to them, IMO they take more vibrant JPEGs, prefer the 1.5 crop factor...

Tough decision. If Canon had released a 70D replacement, I'd be more inclined to go with it. Its datedness bothers me.
 
Pretty torn, the 70D is an older better camera, but the D5500 is a newer more practical camera with a lot of assistive features.

I was never unhappy with my 6MP D40 and would prefer to put money into glass.

Nikons feel better in my hand, I'm more used to them, IMO they take more vibrant JPEGs, prefer the 1.5 crop factor...

Tough decision. If Canon had released a 70D replacement, I'd be more inclined to go with it. Its datedness bothers me.

You prefer the 1.5x crop factor over the canon 1.6x because… the maths is easier? :confused: Practically it makes no difference.
 
You prefer the 1.5x crop factor over the canon 1.6x because… the maths is easier? :confused: Practically it makes no difference.

Makes forking out for a wide angle lens more bearable...

Looking into the 750/760D, wonder when it'll be available.
 
Makes forking out for a wide angle lens more bearable...

Looking into the 750/760D, wonder when it'll be available.

What you lose on the wide end you gain on the other and we all know wide angle lenses are typically cheaper than telephoto… but like I said, practically it makes little difference.
 
Are you really going to use the touchscreen? Personally I only ever use my LCD to review with non-CPU lenses if I'm unsure about light. And of course to review pics taken. I would've suggested the 5300 but I see the price difference is only +-R1000. Huh

Anyway...If I had R14k to drop on camera gear I would've gotten a 2nd hand D600 though.
 
Last edited:
What you lose on the wide end you gain on the other and we all know wide angle lenses are typically cheaper than telephoto… but like I said, practically it makes little difference.

Makes good sense, a strong argument for crop sensors too. Though, with some hesitance, I would say for now I am interested in the wider end.

Very difficult decision, no camera has everything I want, but the 760D is looking good. Early though and not wise to buy on a whim.

D5500 is also still a great contender due to its size and weight.

Full frame is also calling, looking at the Nikon D750. But it doesn't have touch screen and it's big. Would get Tokina lenses for it.

Mirrorless is also calling, Olympus and Fujifilm flagships - http://mybroadband.co.za/vb/showthread.php/601194-Nikon-tax?p=14737872&viewfull=1#post14737872. Downside is 2x crop factor...

Tough call...
 
Personally I don't get the touch screen either. In fact I would've preferred a price cut on my 70D without the touch screen. The important settings are already buttons on the camera. I don't think I've used the touch once.
 
Personally I don't get the touch screen either. In fact I would've preferred a price cut on my 70D without the touch screen. The important settings are already buttons on the camera. I don't think I've used the touch once.

Yeah, not the be all and end all. What I wanted was to match my iPhoneography experience as close as possible, so touch was appealing initially. Seeing as most modern cameras can be operated from a smartphone, I was prepared to look past it.

Settled with the Fujifilm X-T1.

ImageUploadedByMyBroadband1426020623.357683.jpg

ImageUploadedByMyBroadband1426020662.912794.jpg
 
Lovely looking camera, congrats!

It really looks like a piece of art to me. ;)

The Japanese build quality is second to none. My faith is somewhat restored that there are companies making quality products like this. It's why, out of other consumer electronic goods, I do like Sony. :p

Really? Can't stand those "retro" bodies with all those knobs myself.

Definitely hipster, but the fact it's similar to how cameras used to look dismisses that to a large degree, IMO. To me, the full black also lessens the hipsterness.

The buttons and toggles work similarly to older cameras... And now I can see how my photo will look, at any and all settings adjustments, before taking the shot, on the rear LCD or 2.6 million pixel OLED electronic viewfinder.

For anyone interested, from a post of mine elsewhere:

It uses a DSLR-equivalent sensor, but without the mirror. The mirror is what lets you see what you're capturing/composing, reflected from the lens through the DSLR's optical viewfinder. It adds size and weight to the camera, more moving parts, louder, etc.

This mirrorless camera uses the best electronic viewfinder available, with a 2.64 million pixel OLED display. You put your eye up to the viewfinder, and literally see a TV's size digitally-represented image. No mirror or optical viewfinder, so you don't see the real life capture/composition, it's all electronic.

What this means is that you can tweak ISO/shutter speed/aperture etc. and instantly see exactly how your photo will look, before even taking the shot!

And a lot more.

This is cutting edge technology and has even won the hearts of many pros.

TL;DR

One of the best mirrorless cameras, compact with DSLR quality.
 
The buttons and toggles work similarly to older cameras... And now I can see how my photo will look, at any and all settings adjustments, before taking the shot, on the rear LCD or 2.6 million pixel OLED electronic viewfinder.
Yeah, I can do that on my dslrs… but never do.

@bwana, with 8 FPS, it might even be a good secondary replacement (or addition)... ;)
Frame rate is fair but there's more involved than that for me.

different strokes I guess, personally I love it
I get that.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X