No More Personal Attacks!!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can manipulate the structure of my latop with a baseball bat if I choose to. It doesnt mean that I am responsible for the creation of all laptops.

NO BUT THE FACT IS YOU DESTROYED ONE AND CREATED RUBBLE FOR THAT MATTER. Does that prove any point? What does that have to do with supporting your viewpoint?
 
Not defensive at all. Waiting for the facts and truth that supports your viewpoints. Its not me that have the habit of making comments and compliment it with a sarcastic icon. I am sure the Scientology religion creator you refer to had no knowledge of what the scientists do today. So it is a interesting concept that his beliefs in DNA manipulation as you stated can be achieved by scientists today. Not?

No, you just have a shortcut for the LOL key
 
I am sure the Scientology religion creator you refer to had no knowledge of what the scientists do today. So it is a interesting concept that his beliefs in DNA manipulation as you stated can be achieved by scientists today. Not?

No he was too drugged up.

And no his beliefs in DNA manipulation are vastly different to what we can do. He believed that exploding H-Bombs over non-existant volcanos with aliens inside would create blocks of "badness" that would attach itself to humans via their DNA.

Yeah, sounds kinda similar to how scientists do it these days (I enjoy my sarcasm - it keeps me sane in dealing with <censored>)
 
NO BUT THE FACT IS YOU DESTROYED ONE AND CREATED RUBBLE FOR THAT MATTER. Does that prove any point? What does that have to do with supporting your viewpoint?

No need to shout. Relax, before you get another infraction Fiat. Actually I am trying to get it through to you that simply being able to manipulate something doesnt make it possible to create it. Therefore, how can you place all your belief on the fact that these days we are able to manipulate DNA. Can we create it? Even if we could create it, how does that prove that we did it millions of years ago? Insane IMHO.
 
no it was the egg, the egg, to which the chicken will be born out of had a mutated embryo from another bird.

Evolved? Chicken
Created? Egg

Why? Because the egg could only adapt to its surroundings which is the chicken's arse. Therefore the chicken's arse must have evolved to have forced the egg to evolve. The same arguement can be made for the heat of the egg or the composition of the egg which could also change its evolutionary path - minus he chicken's arse though.
 
No need to shout. Relax, before you get another infraction Fiat. Actually I am trying to get it through to you that simply being able to manipulate something doesnt make it possible to create it. Therefore, how can you place all your belief on the fact that these days we are able to manipulate DNA. Can we create it? Even if we could create it, how does that prove that we did it millions of years ago? Insane IMHO.

I did not shout. I am strugling with this damn mickey mouse keyboard as my normal one have a problem. I need to resolder some wires. This thing keeps on doing its own thingy and I did not want to retype. i look at the keyboard when typing. LOL
 
No need to shout. Relax, before you get another infraction Fiat. Actually I am trying to get it through to you that simply being able to manipulate something doesnt make it possible to create it. Therefore, how can you place all your belief on the fact that these days we are able to manipulate DNA. Can we create it? Even if we could create it, how does that prove that we did it millions of years ago? Insane IMHO.

Have you not seen the organ, a little heart of something, they grew a few weeks ago. They held it with tweezers but it was pumping. A major breakthrough. It was on BBC news.
 
No need to shout. Relax, before you get another infraction Fiat. Actually I am trying to get it through to you that simply being able to manipulate something doesnt make it possible to create it. Therefore, how can you place all your belief on the fact that these days we are able to manipulate DNA. Can we create it? Even if we could create it, how does that prove that we did it millions of years ago? Insane IMHO.

Just as insane as the probability of evolution IMHO.
 
no it was the egg, the egg, to which the chicken will be born out of had a mutated embryo from another bird.

Nope. Don't agree. The egg is a product of the evolved chicken. The embryo is a chicken, the egg can be unfertilized and thus not viable. QED.
 
No, by being faced with the fact that they probably can't get a cell phone signal out there!
Why am I having such a hard timegetting through to you?:rolleyes:

Because I don't understand your analogy. I normally understand them, but yours, nope.

Teach me, please.
 
Have you not seen the organ, a little heart of something, they grew a few weeks ago. They held it with tweezers but it was pumping. A major breakthrough. It was on BBC news.

I did see that, well done to them - a breakthrough. What does that have to do with someone manipulating our DNA a few million years ago? Come on Fiat, surely your beliefs are based on more than just this - I can rebut them with one-liners if necessary.
 
Thanks guys the chicken/egg scenario just proved my point. To be fair there should have been quiet a few mutated eggs or chicks to create a new species. The chance is just so inconceivable that even you cannot agree. Thus IMHO creation is the alternate avenue to explore.
Good night and happy Valentine. You too PostmanPot.

I love all the creators designs even if they are as flawed as me.! :D
 
Just as insane as the probability of evolution IMHO.

Insane as what? I didnt make any claims in that post! And dont cherry pick, answer the questions.

I will re-iterate to avoid you having to use your keyboard excessively:

Can we create DNA from scratch?
Even if we could, how does this prove that we did it millions of years ago? It proves that we can do it now, yes, but not millions of years ago. Again, scientology should be a pretty attractive option for you Fiat - speak to your local Church about them.
 
You don't believe or not believe in evolution, you simply accept it as fact.

But you simply cannot accept Roziers facts but want me to accept unproven scientific evolutionary facts. BTW if you did not notice. They are still trying to dig up the missing link.
 
Insane as what? I didnt make any claims in that post! And dont cherry pick, answer the questions.

I will re-iterate to avoid you having to use your keyboard excessively:

Can we create DNA from scratch?
Even if we could, how does this prove that we did it millions of years ago? It proves that we can do it now, yes, but not millions of years ago. Again, scientology should be a pretty attractive option for you Fiat - speak to your local Church about them.
Is this really the thread for that qn? :confused:
 
Thanks guys the chicken/egg scenario just proved my point. To be fair there should have been quiet a few mutated eggs or chicks to create a new species. The chance is just so inconceivable that even you cannot agree. Thus IMHO creation is the alternate avenue to explore.
Good night and happy Valentine. You too PostmanPot.

I love all the creators designs even if they are as flawed as me.! :D

Not sure how you came to this conclusion. I tried reading your rollercoaster, I mean post, but cant make heads, tails or eggs out of it.
 
Insane as what? I didnt make any claims in that post! And dont cherry pick, answer the questions.

I will re-iterate to avoid you having to use your keyboard excessively:

Can we create DNA from scratch?
Even if we could, how does this prove that we did it millions of years ago? It proves that we can do it now, yes, but not millions of years ago. Again, scientology should be a pretty attractive option for you Fiat - speak to your local Church about them.

Not Yet
Who knows whats out there and still to be found
There you go sarcasm again.

Creation by intelligent design is the option IMHV.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X