Ombudsman dismisses DA complaint

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,560
Reaction score
10,188
Location
District 9
The Press Ombudsman has dismissed a complaint by the Democratic Alliance that a story printed in The Star newspaper was inaccurate.

Ombudsman Johan Retief, in a ruling released on Monday, said the complaint was about a story printed on April 22 this year, and syndicated across Independent Group titles, headlined "Reserve Bank 'does endorse DA economic plans' ".

"The DA complains that the story inaccurately stated that: the party were running a radio advertisement that the SA Reserve Bank had 'endorsed' its economic plan and had “agreed” with it..." said Retief.

"...And party leader Helen Zille said at a rally in Kroonstad that the Reserve Bank had 'modelled' its economic policy."

The story stated that the DA was "continuing to claim that the SA Reserve Bank has endorsed the party's economic politics, despite both the bank and Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan rejecting the claims several months ago".

This was even though DA leaders were careful to attribute the endorsement of their manifesto to "a Reserve Bank consultant".

"The journalists claimed that the DA's radio adverts 'repeat[ed] the claims'," Retief said.

"They also reported that Zille said at a rally outside Kroonstad that this consultant 'did an economic model of the DA's policies and stated it would lead to eight percent growth and six million real, sustainable jobs'.

"Gordhan reportedly said that the Bank had not endorsed the consultant's 'working paper'."

The text of the advert included: "It's clear that our country needs jobs. More jobs means less crime and a better life for everyone. The DA will carry out a plan that the South African Reserve Bank [SARB] says will create six million real, permanent jobs…".

The ombudsman said the journalists also stated the advert said the SARB 'agreed' that the DA's economic plan would lead to an eight percent growth rate and the creation of six million jobs," Retief said.

Retief said the questions confronting him was whether the story misrepresented the DA's position and, if so, whether it had likely caused it unnecessary harm.

While Retief believed that the story was technically inaccurate, he referenced an interview Zille had done with eNCA, which The Star had also cited, where she said: "We know we can get six million jobs if we have a proper economic policy that can grow the economy at eight percent per year.

"The Reserve Bank has modelled the DA's policy and has concluded that indeed we can achieve eight percent growth."

Retief said if Zille never said those words, he would have found the statement in the story to be essentially untrue and an apology would have been appropriate.

"However, I have evidence that she did make that statement. Even though the story inaccurately stated that the DA's advert said the SARB had endorsed its policy, I therefore do not believe that this mistake may have caused it unnecessary harm of any kind."

Retief said he had no evidence that Zille stated the SARB had "modelled" or "endorsed" the DA's policy, at the rally near Kroonstad.

"The newspaper also did not provide me with any proof to this effect," he said.

"However, even if it was inaccurate to have stated that she made this statement near Kroonstad, Zille had made the very same assertion elsewhere.

"I therefore again do not believe that this mistake was material and that it would have caused her or her party any unnecessary harm."

Regardless of the above, Retief was concerned the journalists got the when and the where of Zille's statement wrong on both occasions.

"This is a cause for concern, and should urgently be addressed by the powers that be at The Star," he said.

"Secondly, if I ask the newspaper to correct the inaccuracies, the message would still be that Zille was on record as saying that the SARB had modelled the DA's policy -- which is exactly what the party does not want."


Source : Sapa /aw/aa/jje
Date : 19 May 2014 08:05
 
OMBUDSMAN UPHOLDS DA COMPLAINT

The Press Ombudsman has upheld a complaint by the DA that a report in the Sunday Independent over a "Twitter race war" was inaccurate and misleading.

Ombudsman Johan Retief, in a ruling released on Monday, said the Democratic Alliance's complaint was about a story published on April 20 headlined "DA digs in amid Twitter race war".

The Democratic Alliance's communications head Gavin Davis complained that the headline and several statements about the party and leader Helen Zille were incorrect and misleading.

"The story, written by Shanti Aboobaker, said that, as political parties ratchet up their election rhetoric, supporters of Zille have taken to twitter to liken ANC politicians to the Nazis," said Retief.

Aboobaker mentioned a tweet by the user @Blow_Back_Time, who addressed a message to Zille and Davis saying: "This [Adolf Hitler] is the real face of Gwede Mantashe".

The tweet contained a picture of Nazi leader Hitler, complete with a swastika band, next to African National Congress secretary general Gwede Mantashe. A swastika had been photo-shopped onto the lapel of his jacket.

The journalist wrote in the story that although the comments violated the Electoral Code of Conduct and skirted the boundaries of hate speech, the DA refused to condemn or distance Zille from them.

Aboobaker added that Zille and Davis "seemed to see nothing wrong with likening a black South African politician to a genocidal white supremacist, and refused to condemn the tweet despite a storm of protests from many of their own followers".

Aboobaker continued that Zille seemed to encourage the tweeter by calling the message "ironic" because she said the ANC called her Hitler or a Nazi. The journalist said Zille produced no evidence to support her claim.

Davis complained the entire story had been concocted by resorting to exaggeration and omission.

"Overall, the net effect of these inaccuracies is that the reader is left with the impression that the DA condones racism and Nazism. Nothing could be further from the truth," he said.

Sunday Independent executive editor Janet Smith said she disagreed that the story effectively accused the DA of Nazism.

"Our story grew out of a debate which our reporter followed which played out on a public twitter feed. Miss Aboobaker is our designated reporter to follow the DA throughout its campaign."

Smith added that the story only showed that Zille and her party had themselves attempted to liken the ANC to the Nazis, but not in terms of anti-Semitism.

"This contention is supported in repeated comments which Ms Zille and the DA had previously made about, for example, 'Gestapo-like crackdowns' by the 'Zuma SABC' on freedom of speech.

"However, we understand that rhetoric is a major part of electioneering, and that this so-called negative campaigning was part of the DA's strategy, as it also was for some other parties," Smith concluded.

Retief said the journalist firstly assumed the person who tweeted was a DA supporter, which was quite innocent.

"However, from there the reporter not only erroneously stated that tweet users broke the Electoral Code, but she also explicitly stated that the DA refused to condemn this or to distance itself from such transgressions," he said.

It was his view that one could not distance oneself from a transgression that did not even take place.

He said the journalist hinted at possible hate speech, whatever its definition, and again directly linked the DA to it.

Thus, Retief found that the electoral code and hate speech mentions were both in breach of the Press Code.

The code stipulated that the press had to take care to report news truthfully, accurately and fairly, only present what may reasonably be true as fact, and exercise care and consideration in matters involving reputation.

Retief found the headline misleading.

"Although the headline was not of Aboobaker's making, it served to fuel the non-existent fire the reporter had, evidently, attempted to light," he said.

The net effect of the story was in breach of section 2.2 of the Press Code, which stated that news should be presented in context and in a balanced manner.

The section also stipulated that there should be no intentional or negligent departure from the facts whether by distortion, exaggeration or misrepresentation, material omissions or summarisation.

The Sunday Independent was ordered to apologise to the DA, Zille, and Davis. The paper was directed to publish the sanction and the finding. It had seven working days to appeal.


Source : Sapa /je/jk/jje/th
Date : 19 May 2014 11:23
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X