bageloo said:
My point was that companies rarely hire unskilled/unqualified blacks.
True, they simply don't hire ANYONE AT ALL. The govt. has vacancies all over the place which they refuse to fill because they can't find a black person. THAT is where the paw-paw hits the fan with AA :
1. company x needs to do business.
2. company x needs to be BEE qualified to win a contract.
3. company x looses black employees [job hopping]
4. do company x now appoint the next qualified person? NO, company x will wait till they find a >>black<< qualified replacement....
5. meantime , white employee do 2 people's work
6. company x starts getting used to this convenient and cheap setup and stops looking.
7. no one wins, not black or white.
8. white burns out and quits
9. company is screwed and starts outsourcing to white guys who are 3 times more expensive
10. company are unable to expand.
bageloo said:
It is unreasonable to expect blacks to have turned the corner after just 13 years especially since AA/BEE is not as ruthless as the apartheid laws were.
Of course, but it is reasonable to expect that blacks at least CREATE opportunities instead of "replacing" them. Re-open the colleges that were closed for "Apartheid reasons", build new universities, build new schools, build new airports ...let blacks run it all. Instead the ANC is merely renaming,rehashing and replacing the white owned and created "opportunities".
Simple example:
A. Company X -expands- by appointing new black employees. They now have 10 blacks and 20 whites. They still get placed under extreme pressure on the BEE scorecard [if not failing miserably].
vs.
B. Company Y -retrench- 10 white employees and appoint 10 blacks. They now have 10 whites and 10 blacks...they fare significantly better on the BEE scorecard.
Which one of the above do you think are happening?
Is it any wonder that unemployment is probably getting WORSE ? Now no one is getting employed and those that are, are working 2+ jobs. The qualified black guys probably are doing 38 jobs .....aka SAA CEO