Open letter to Gadaffi rebels

Palimino

Expert Member
Joined
May 27, 2009
Messages
4,995
Reaction score
4
Untrained Libyan rebels are facing Gadaffi’s air force. Some pointers on AA strategy follow.

Cordon Bleu AA strategy.

Ingredients:
Intelligence (information)
Knowledge of aircraft specs.
Observation posts
Gun sights
Aim-off know how

Method:
Deploy forward observation posts along the expected enemy aircraft route in radio contact with base. When they sight enemy aircraft they should try and identify them (and warn of expected imminent attack). By identification and with knowledge of aircraft specifications they can deduce the likely airfield origin, fuel range, number of likely attack runs, attack speed, attack profile and tactics. These last are determined by the profile of the airfield commander worked-up by analysts and gained by intelligence. AA guns are oriented to meet the attack, sights are preset and preparations are made (enticing ‘bait’ could also be set-up and guns zeroed around it).

Aim-off.
Fighter jet aircraft travel fast, AA bullets take a perceptible time to reach them. If you aim at the fighter, by the time the bullets get there the fighter is no longer there and the bullets pass behind. The idea is to get aircraft and bullets to meet at the same place. You have to fire ahead of the aircraft (depending on distance) to zap him. Learn and know your gun sights. In a side-on profile, fire ahead. In a head-on (or tail-on) profile, fire directly at the aircraft. If the rounds are not all tracer, make sure at least every 5th round is (so you can see where you are shooting and correct).

Ad hoc strategy:
I have noted from TV images that AA guns are mounted on the backs of bakkies. This will create an unstable gun platform; the recoil from the gun will cause the bakkie springs to rock. You will always miss. When the bakkie (gun) is in place, all the bakkie’s wheels must be raised about 2cm above the ground (carjacks or something). This will bypass the suspension springs and give a rock solid gun platform (your accuracy will improve).

Use it, don’t use it.
 
No way those crappy AA guns I saw on the news can hit a jet. Maybe in WW2 those things would work.
 
I read that most of the air strikes had no effect. Either the aircraft had no ammo, were only used as intimidation, got frightened by the bakkie mounted AA, the pilots had no idea what target to hit or the pilots were not going to kill their families and friends.
If the air assault was intended, huge damage would have been caused. This in turn would have turned even more people to become active rebels.
 
No way those crappy AA guns I saw on the news can hit a jet. Maybe in WW2 those things would work.

The only disadvantage of older guns is they may not be able to reach high altitudes. I understood the threat to be strafing and low altitude attack runs. Well within range. Gun sights are the key (and modern ammo). WW2 sights were primitive. Of course, gun maintenance is also important – routine and non-complex. On the news last night was information that a Libyan jet had been downed by an old man, firing an AA gun for the 1st time with only one working barrel . Fluke! Gun maintenance is obviously an issue.

In other circumstances I may well regard the rebels as enemies. However, I feel that they have a right to be free of oppression, slaughter from the air and intimidation from that murdering thug. I do what I can on the Internet and their AA skills suck (their gun maintenance skills too).
 
No way those crappy AA guns I saw on the news can hit a jet. Maybe in WW2 those things would work.

Evidently, something like 70-80% of combat losses of aircraft, including fast jets, are to small arms fire, never mind dedicated AAA. The guy with an AK is more likely to shoot you down than the guy manning the ZSU-23-4. Ground fire during the first Gulf War was so effective that it necessitated a change in Coalition bombing tactics from low level penetration, as had been developed to counter the threat of Soviet SAMS during the cold war, to medium altitude bombing, and to hell with the SAM threat. One famous quote from the war illustrates this quite well - "King Kong with a noose around my nuts could not drag me back down to low level bombing, ever again".

So you might find that those "crappy AA guns" are something more of a threat than you might think ;)
 
The rebels have tons of SAM-7s as well as the numerous ZSU AA guns which are actually very dangerous to low flying aircraft and ground forces.
 
No way those crappy AA guns I saw on the news can hit a jet. Maybe in WW2 those things would work.

You would be surprised how effective AA is. Remember the jets cannot fly high and at max speed when on a bombing run.

Btw, they have already shot down at least one jet and a couple of helis
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X