South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
These are two different issues, and cannot be combined. If you have a contract amount and you've been overpaid on that amount, you need to pay that back to the employer and speak to your accountant about a revision submission to SARS. You should have picked this up the first month it happened. If you invert the situation and assume they underpaid you - surely you'd have picked that up no?So I do agree after reading the employment act it seems as if I do owe the money back, correct?
My payslip states a certain amount nett pay and I receive that as per the payslip, however it is not in accordance with my contract as I have received a raise (of which was a verbal agreement) twice.
I do also work overtime, of which in my contract states it may be needed, however working 50+hours a week (including a Saturday) with no lunch break and these hours are not compensated.
I am a bit sour as they are in breach of the employment act in many regards and the accountant has made an error with the payslip to include a travel allowance of which I use my employers card to pay for fuel.
not compensated its all about what you negotiate. Cant say hey pay me for something that wasnt agreed overtime is only a given below R350k or something like that.These are two different issues, and cannot be combined. If you have a contract amount and you've been overpaid on that amount, you need to pay that back to the employer and speak to your accountant about a revision submission to SARS. You should have picked this up the first month it happened. If you invert the situation and assume they underpaid you - surely you'd have picked that up no?
If you are working through lunches and overtime unpaid, that's a separate issue that needs to be flagged with HR and compensated for.
100% I do agree. It is a little confusing as I do get compensated for travel costs, however not in my salary apparently, hence the mistake that was made by the accountant. Yesterday was just an unfortunate day.These are two different issues, and cannot be combined. If you have a contract amount and you've been overpaid on that amount, you need to pay that back to the employer and speak to your accountant about a revision submission to SARS. You should have picked this up the first month it happened. If you invert the situation and assume they underpaid you - surely you'd have picked that up no?
If you are working through lunches and overtime unpaid, that's a separate issue that needs to be flagged with HR and compensated for.
Around R500pm.how much we talking? Like R10k? R100k? R50?
I believe overtime is only given for those who earn under R204 000. So it would not apply to my situation. I don’t have a standing here unfortunately.not compensated its all about what you negotiate. Cant say hey pay me for something that wasnt agreed overtime is only a given below R350k or something like that.
Hopefully my boss is considerate of your suggestions lolIts only fair that you pay back the amount but its also fair that you get time off work, travel and accounting fees to fix their mistake and rectify your SARS standing.
Well all you can do is neg for future payment, say no or accept status quoI believe overtime is only given for those who earn under R204 000. So it would not apply to my situation. I don’t have a standing here unfortunately.
Around R500pm.
I had this a while ago. My returns were submitted with a duplicated digit, and SARS was after me for almost R 1 million for the year. I wouldn't call it a horror story, though, as it took my accountant a day or two to resolve (after getting previous employer to correct).Yup, I have heard some horror stories tho dbl salaries etc too
A misconception is that because overtime is excluded by those exceeding the threshold, it means you do not get paid... this is incorrect. You just don't receive 1.5x rate but must still be paid for the time you worked as normal time.I believe overtime is only given for those who earn under R204 000. So it would not apply to my situation. I don’t have a standing here unfortunately.
A misconception is that because overtime is excluded by those exceeding the threshold, it means you do not get paid... this is incorrect. You just don't receive 1.5x rate but must still be paid for the time you worked as normal time.
In addition, you have the right to decline overtime. It can not be forced, no matter what you earn. You just need to understand if your boss is the understanding type or not because poking that bear, there's no turning back.
Around R500pm.
Aw dear... do you live in SA?A misconception is that because overtime is excluded by those exceeding the threshold, it means you do not get paid... this is incorrect. You just don't receive 1.5x rate but must still be paid for the time you worked as normal time.
In addition, you have the right to decline overtime. It can not be forced, no matter what you earn. You just need to understand if your boss is the understanding type or not because poking that bear, there's no turning back.
Aw dear... do you live in SA?
when I was in SA, I never got paid a cent for any overtime I worked.. during a career of what.. 20 years?
And refusal to work overtime... I did that once... I declined because someone was really sick and I had to deal with that. Ended well for me... I had to find another job.
What the labour law says and what happens in practice are two different things.
They can claim it back but they need to negotiate reasonable terms with youGood evening,
I am having troubles at work whereby my payslip that has been issued for the previous two years had an additional amount added each month (small nonetheless) and my employer has realised the mistake via the accountant. They are requesting I pay the monies back. Is this legally allowed? I do understand if I was overpaid and my payslip indicated a different amount, however the money I receive each month is in accordance with the payslip.
Any advice would be appreciated
recap:Good evening,
I am having troubles at work whereby my payslip that has been issued for the previous two years had an additional amount added each month (small nonetheless) and my employer has realised the mistake via the accountant. They are requesting I pay the monies back. Is this legally allowed? I do understand if I was overpaid and my payslip indicated a different amount, however the money I receive each month is in accordance with the payslip.
Any advice would be appreciated
It's not about firing, it's about ending someone's opportunity for growth. Being passed for increases, promotions, etc.If only it was that easy to fire someone in South Africa.
SOrry, I am an employer that pays a good number of tech staff every month and I defend the guyrecap:
1. payslip says R100
2. gets R125 p/m for 2 years
3. never knew about it
4. employers wants money back
5. acts surprised
6. now consults if this is legal without considering never knewing about it.
assumption(s):
1. no monthly budgeting
2. no recheck/double check funds coming in (incomes)
3. no recheck/double check money going out in (deductions)
conclusion: