Polo vivo or normal polo?

LuqmaanBaboo

Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2012
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
So my girlfriend is interested in purchasing a car. The car must be an automatic and preferably a Polo (her point of view) . I suggested this Polo Vivo. Its a 2016 model for R155000 with 43000km on the clock. Her suggestion (one minded must be said) is this Polo. Its a 2014 model for R189000 with 81000km. The price different is R34000. What car would be better to get get in terms of reliability and price? I know performance wise the Polo probably kills the Vivo but I think its a waste of money solely because its going to be used to drive to work and thats about it.

Thanks.
 
Doesnt matter which one, it will be stolen or high jacked pretty quick. If it were me, the later model with lower km's.
 
That vivo is a pos. Rather take the polo. No contest.
 
Polo is a nicer place to be, better finishing and noise damping. but if it really is just a commuter, the NA vivo is a safer bet
 
Doesnt matter which one, it will be stolen or high jacked pretty quick. If it were me, the later model with lower km's.
Hate it when people say this. Yes statistics are higher but I've been jumping between Polos and Golfs for about ten years without as much as a broken window even
 
And in terms of trade in value? The time she trades the car it will be over 100000km. By how much does the mileage depreciate the Polo? If she trades it in in 5 years time, the car will 10 years old.
 
Hate it when people say this. Yes statistics are higher but I've been jumping between Polos and Golfs for about ten years without as much as a broken window even
And half my dad's life he's been between Toyota and Polo, and only 2 Toyota incidents.
 
Get an insurance quote, polo's are more expensive to insure.
 
Last edited:
Your insurance is going to be very expensive because of the high hijack rate of Polo's.
 
I would get the 2015 Polo... The Vivo will feel less of a premium than the Polo.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X