Why do you think there is even that?An edge over thumbsucking.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Why do you think there is even that?An edge over thumbsucking.
Your opposition is using ML too, and using it with far more resources and Far more expertise.Or you need to let ML do what it does best. Learn from evolving data.
? That’s a pretty non sequitur response.My opposition is not just bots. And of those bots not all are using ML. Some use standard market trading strategies, ping-pong, double Bollinger bands etc.
It is a case of chucking mud and see what sticks. I am trying various indicators at various time frames and then selecting the optimal parameters that yield the smallest error and best PPV.I see bollinger bands in there - for predicting trend? Sorry, I should probably analyze it properly.



Viewed? I have viewed some of these videos to learn about some trading systems and indicators.OP I have a simple question for you, data analysis aside. How long have you actually viewed or participated in the crypto market?
Omw...Viewed? I have viewed some of these videos to learn about some trading systems and indicators.
And I try to read up on some of the value propositions of the various coins.
Participated? I am about to put in $50 if the models show some potential.
They just gate keeping the local Mybb crypto cool kids club. Don’t expect much positivity to come from the grumpy old men here.Viewed? I have viewed some of these videos to learn about some trading systems and indicators.
And I try to read up on some of the value propositions of the various coins.
Participated? I am about to put in $50 if the models show some potential.
You serious?They just gate keeping the local Mybb crypto cool kids club. Don’t expect much positivity to come from the grumpy old men here.
Invest your $50 and let’s track that against what you have modelled. Would be informative for many.
Gotcha.You serious?
We are talking abt someone that appears to have zero crypto knowledge. Crypto trading is very very different to your "traditional trading". But I mean I'm just a mean old cool kid.
Also another reason you don't wanna do this is in extreme periods of volatility exchanges "crash"
I said don't waste your time with something like this and crypto due to its EXTREME VOLATILITY.
Rather do this with fx or gold. I'm not discounting the AI bot I'm just saying stay away from crypto
I have watched it since 2018. But that means nothing.Omw...
How many days months years etc.
Have you actually watched the crypto market?
I am not asking how many years data you have I'm asking how many years etc you have watched it.
Your response indicates that you are very very new to crypto.
I am looking for the most volatile coins. The ones with the biggest up and down swings. ALICE is an example. But none of my models yield any kind of decent accuracy for it so I will stay away from it. However, other coins with decent volatility such as MANA, Sandbox, Aragon, FTM and Solana yield decent models. These are the ones I think I will try.Gotcha.
That said the speed of fx and gold is slow as mud to train and improve in comparison to crypto. Large dataset of historical data has a negligible influence to future trades. So I don’t see value in training against gold. FX possibly maybe.
Crypto more fun and as somebody said driven by solving media and the herd mentality if you can pic up of those trends early you may just be into something. I.e track the sentiment indicators.





We will see if it is a failure.It’s not an “ML failure”. Does “> 95% accuracy” not set off red flags for you?
Anything that can be predicted as high as 95% or more in finance is either a known quantity that doesn’t need to be predicted or wrong.We will see if it is a failure.
No it does not set off red flags. All it means is that the ML could successfully predict 95% of future downtrends in a specific verification dataset. That does not imply that those patterns will translate to future time points.
That verification dateset was 1 week. Accuracy drops as I increase the length.
If it is an ML failure, so what? I don't expect 100% success.
So, this is a key point. Anything directional with more than 50% plus epsilon is either arbitrage (and you will lose the race), or incredibly likely to be a conceptual error.If it is an ML failure, so what? I don't expect 100% success. I am hoping for > 50% success. I am trying a few more parameter changes and settings before putting some money in with this system.
The most likely option can be that the verification set was just too small and just happens to contain simpler patterns that are picked up by ML.Anything that can be predicted as high as 95% or more in finance is either a known quantity that doesn’t need to be predicted or wrong.
