This piece of info on EtfRA’s website speaks volumes about their integrity:
‘Low "clean" costs (1,35% per annum "all-in" - no other hidden charges or fees, includes asset management fees, brokerage/JSE charges, debit orders, full administration of accounts, benefits, reporting and compliance, Trustees fees and RA management).’
What they fail to mention is that the 1.35% is excluding VAT. So it is actually 1.54%. Typical of these scumbag brokers.
Same with 10X. The 0.9% is actually 1.03% VAT incl.
To my knowledge the cheapest way for an SA investor to get the advantages of an RA with low cost passive index funds is through Old Mutual. Now I hate Old Mutual for their exploitative legacy and their pathetic service levels, and they will never see my money. However investors should look at their offering before they commit to any of the passive RA options mentioned because Old Mutual is cheaper and service wise these new operators are unproven. Also these offerings are very inflexible with very little choice. You cannot build your own portfolio in the way Old Mutual allows you to.
The Old Mutual unit trust RA fund charges zero admin fees for direct investors (no financial adviser middleman). The only costs are the underlying fund management fees.
https://www.oldmutual.co.za/persona...s/retirement-products/retirement-annuity.aspx
For eg. You can build the following portfolio:
Fund name: Fee: Allocation
RAFI SA fund: 0.86% :25%
Top40 fund: 0.68% :25%
Bond fund: 0.86% :15%
Property fund: 1.43% :10%
Global RAFI fund: 0.8% :25%
Total cost 0.86%(vat incl)
Contrast that with EtfSA RA 1.54%(vat incl), 10X 1.03%(vat incl) , itransact RA 1.88 (vat incl).
I personally have my RA with Allan Gray since Jan 2002 and just dump everything in their balanced fund which has returned 20.7% per year since that date. They have no admin or platform or wrap fees, only the underlying fund management fee. You can go direct without an adviser – see their website. The balanced fund costs 1.14% per year + a performance fee of 10% of the outperformance achieved over the benchmark. So the cost is about the same as for these passive alternatives if this fund only achieves in line with the index funds or less. The performance fee only comes into play for outperformance, I keep 90% they take 10%. If a passively managed RA costs me the same as an actively managed one with a top manager, I prefer the active management and the risk that goes with it. If I can find a passive RA for less than 0.3% all in cost I will move.