Racist Cop, protects thieves!

Read this earlier - can you believe it. In the end it will be words of the racist victim and racist witness against the poor black cop.
 
Geriatrix said:
Hmmm, I wonder if I can make a land claim then....:D
Click to expand...

Can we argue that black people grabbed the land from us, and forced us to move to Europe (where we developed the white skin), therefore use Europeans are entitled to land in Africa.

Of course, that means that the Chinese will be entitled to land in Europe, and land in Africa. And so it goes on. Reductio ad absurdum.
 
We should all go and toy toy outside the police station
Click to expand...
heaheaheahea! toi toi toi toi! stomp feet...
lmao that just looks wrong
 
Tassidar said:
Can we argue that black people grabbed the land from us, and forced us to move to Europe (where we developed the white skin), therefore use Europeans are entitled to land in Africa.

Of course, that means that the Chinese will be entitled to land in Europe, and land in Africa. And so it goes on. Reductio ad absurdum.
Click to expand...

I don't follow, could you please explain. You 'developed the white skin' after being kicked out of Africa?
 
Last edited:
Metal Gear!? said:
I don't follow, could you please explain. You 'developed the white skin' after being kicked out of Africa?
Click to expand...

Sure. Europe is on a more extreme latitude than most of Africa, from that follows that it receives less UV light, which leads to less pigmentation.
Over generations, blacks living in Europe would become lighter.
 
PeterCH said:
Sure. Europe is on a more extreme latitude than most of Africa, from that follows that it receives less UV light, which leads to less pigmentation.
Over generations, blacks living in Europe would become lighter.
Click to expand...

This is what he said, in the past-tense:

Tassidar said:
Can we argue that black people grabbed the land from us, and forced us to move to Europe (where we developed the white skin), therefore use Europeans are entitled to land in Africa.

Of course, that means that the Chinese will be entitled to land in Europe, and land in Africa. And so it goes on. Reductio ad absurdum.
Click to expand...

I don't see how what you're saying is relevant.
 
My point was simply to trivialise the whole land grab story.

Africans claim that land was taken away from them. Go back a couple of million years, and Europeans might claim that they were kicked out of Africa by the Africans - therefore they are entitled to restitution.

The simple point being that no person can really hold claim to any land except for in the now, since it is probable that at some time in the past they (their ancestors) took over the land from someone else.

As I say, it was a facetious argument.
 
Metal Gear!? said:
This is what he said, in the past-tense:



I don't see how what you're saying is relevant.
Click to expand...

All people develop in Africa. They are dark in colour because of the UV.
Some people get ousted by others. Those people move to Eurasia, and
eventually to Europe. There they go lighter, less UV.

Savvy?
 
Well taking things to such an extreme is rather silly but I agree with you that the premise could be called into question as the Xhosa and other sub-saharan tribes actually took the San's land at some stage and so if you take it to that extreme the San are the only group of people with a legitimate claim to land. However, I see the returning of land to those who were forcibly removed from their homes and forced by the apartheid government as a far more reasonable issue that is worthy of debate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X