The_Potty_1
Active Member
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2018
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 17
Hi
I've got a pretty low-end desktop at work, and a similar box at home. Both are running windows ten, and have 500Gb disk drives.
When windows starts up, my drive typically runs at 100% for some time, and the computer is unresponsive. I suspect that windows silently defragments your drives, because I once found a thread that described how to defragment under W10, and it turned out my drive was already perfectly unfragmented.
Anyway, I noticed that Windows has a built-in software-based RAID system, called Storage spaces. Has anyone tried it? Yes I know a hardware controller is probably better, and I saw a cheap one for R500 here:
https://www.wootware.co.za/sunix-ac...a3-6gb-s-dual-port-pci-e-raid-controller.html
However, my work is super cheap, as it is I'm scratching around for spare hard drives. Yes I know SSD, but not gonna happen.
I generally format my drives in two partitions, so I can re-install the OS and leave my data in place. Yes backups are elsewhere. Windows on C, data on D, both around 250Gb.
So I was thinking, for work, if I stick in two 250Gb drives, I can either mirror or stripe my existing drives, either way I should get a performance boost? Any thoughts which?
Striping (‘Simple (no resiliency)’ in Storage spaces) is probably for gamers and adrenalin junkies, and I qualify either way. All data is spread across all available drives. Data reading and writing is faster, but if any drive fails, you lose data, or even have to re-install your OS.
Mirroring (‘Two-way Mirror’ in Storage spaces) is way safer, and read performance is good. Write performance is ..? What? OK? Better or worse than a single drive?
For home, I may spring for the RAID controller, and actually buy a drive to go with it. Actually, that raises a question, if I buy a 1Tb drive, will the raid controller format it to match the 500Gb drive, and not allow me to use the other 500Gb?
I've got a pretty low-end desktop at work, and a similar box at home. Both are running windows ten, and have 500Gb disk drives.
When windows starts up, my drive typically runs at 100% for some time, and the computer is unresponsive. I suspect that windows silently defragments your drives, because I once found a thread that described how to defragment under W10, and it turned out my drive was already perfectly unfragmented.
Anyway, I noticed that Windows has a built-in software-based RAID system, called Storage spaces. Has anyone tried it? Yes I know a hardware controller is probably better, and I saw a cheap one for R500 here:
https://www.wootware.co.za/sunix-ac...a3-6gb-s-dual-port-pci-e-raid-controller.html
However, my work is super cheap, as it is I'm scratching around for spare hard drives. Yes I know SSD, but not gonna happen.
I generally format my drives in two partitions, so I can re-install the OS and leave my data in place. Yes backups are elsewhere. Windows on C, data on D, both around 250Gb.
So I was thinking, for work, if I stick in two 250Gb drives, I can either mirror or stripe my existing drives, either way I should get a performance boost? Any thoughts which?
Striping (‘Simple (no resiliency)’ in Storage spaces) is probably for gamers and adrenalin junkies, and I qualify either way. All data is spread across all available drives. Data reading and writing is faster, but if any drive fails, you lose data, or even have to re-install your OS.
Mirroring (‘Two-way Mirror’ in Storage spaces) is way safer, and read performance is good. Write performance is ..? What? OK? Better or worse than a single drive?
For home, I may spring for the RAID controller, and actually buy a drive to go with it. Actually, that raises a question, if I buy a 1Tb drive, will the raid controller format it to match the 500Gb drive, and not allow me to use the other 500Gb?

