DrJohnZoidberg
Honorary Master
Lol
So there is some hope for Swa and his cronies.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Off topic
Evolution amazes me more everyday! I watched wildest Africa the other day and some fish flips itself out the water to find a new stream![]()
three in that thread alone!Just how many identities have you had on here?!![]()
Ah thanks manLol
So there is some hope for Swa and his cronies.
Oh dear, so I should rather not discuss abiogenesis in the context of evolution then?
Ah thanks man.
You should feel insulted. Any association with Swa is highly offensive.
Shush, Zoidberg was dishing out a genuine compliment.You should feel insulted. Any association with Swa is highly offensive.
This to me is much more amazing: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080421-lizard-evolution.htmlOff topic
Evolution amazes me more everyday! I watched wildest Africa the other day and some fish flips itself out the water to find a new stream![]()
This to me is much more amazing: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080421-lizard-evolution.html
Techne knows what I mean![]()
Techne said:Shush, Zoidberg was dishing out a genuine compliment.
That is pretty cool! I wonder whether inheritance of acquired characteristics played a major role these changes? Any molecular research so far?This to me is much more amazing: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/04/080421-lizard-evolution.html
Crikey but you have had a lot of clones over the years.,, weren't you Teleological too?... you almost seemed to be talking to yourself in that thread.
You admit this yet you claim it can't possibly be my reason for rejecting it. I don't get that.Personally I know evolution is fact, the evidence is compelling. However, common ancestry from a single cell to the diverse forms of life today? Nobody can prove that, doesn't matter how many science degrees you have. It's easy to start with an idea and then manipulate your "evidence" to support the idea.
But is the best explanation necessarily good? Telkom arguably has the best broadband in the country. Do you see where such criteria ultimately goes?Thank you, glad you brought this up. A scientific theory is the best possible explanation of ...../pls complete
Yet not all theories are well substantiated. I think you must have been warned before that wiki isn't very good at facts, in fact it's bad.Here is what Wiki has to say: "A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of knowledge that has been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment."
Well it is a trolling thread.Like I said we need to stop entertaining it. The guy keeps arguing that the scientific evidence is against the theory of evolution. He is being given an opportunity to support that claim now and instead he is trolling the lot of us and we are letting him get away with it.
WTF is wrong with you?
I'm afraid you do not understand the answers. Also called speaking in tongues. Not because I'm trying to confuse you but because you don't have the ability to understand it. If you (DJ) saw the fallacies in your own statement you wouldn't ask in the first place but you don't because it's already second nature to you.He cannot give answers for questions for which he say he does, instead he spurts out nonsense.
There isn't for you and yours though.Lol
So there is some hope for Swa and his cronies.
Yet not all theories are well substantiated. I think you must have been warned before that wiki isn't very good at facts, in fact it's bad.
What about the origin of life? More specifically the origin of information embedded in DNA. Neither chemical nor biological evolution has been able to explain the specific order of amino acids related to the specific function of the particular protein.Swa, you don't even understand the Theory of Evolution, so please go educate yourself before you think to argue things you have no idea about.
Frankly, I'm embarrassed for you and for the fact that you can't even see how much damage you're doing to your argument and religion. If the best means of 'disproving' evolution for you is to discredit the research and the supporters, then I'm sorry, but your arguments hold no grounds as that is a logical fallacy. Come back when you can disprove evolution with facts, not insults.
You mean the question about the origins of life and where DNA came from?I think this question is in essence a huge problem for evolutionary scientists because the Darwinist theory of evolution completely falls apart because of it.
I'm afraid you do not understand the answers