Rethinking junk DNA

Hey trolley man:
Detect the idiocy in the following:
Forumite X creates thread.
Forumite Y derails the threads.
Forumite X goes off topic to address forumite Y.
Forumite Y laughs at forumite X for going off topic.

Oh wait, Xs and Ys make your brain go all mushy.

Mission accomplished. The troll's brain is now mush and you can continue to toy with it.
 
Didn't I tell you I don't do x and y's? One day you'll learn to listen and perhaps then pay attention to what is *really* going on and not what you imaging to be going on. They are clearly two very different things.
 
ROFL:

Mission accomplished. The troll's brain is now mush and you can continue to toy with it.


I'll give you one thing, that you are still allowed to post on MyBB is some sort of miracle. Did you sleep with one of the MODS or shared your wife for favours? Wouldn't be surprised though, there is nothing you hold sacred.
 
Phronesis said:
ROFL:

Mission accomplished. The troll's brain is now mush and you can continue to toy with it.
Click to expand...

This is your opinion on what is happening here? hmmm, I am seeing things clearer every time. Getting to know phrony land is entertaining and surprising, just when you think it cannot possibly get dumber... it does! :eek: :rolleyes: :p
 
Well i tried to give some information regarding provisionally labeled junk DNA. What a massive failure that was with the usual trolls. look at where this thread has ended. All thanks to the usual culprits. Ah well, at least you guys pretend to like science. The next thing you guys need to do is actually post something interesting.
 
cyghost said:
This is your opinion on what is happening here? hmmm, I am seeing things clearer every time. Getting to know phrony land is entertaining and surprising, just when you think it cannot possibly get dumber... it does! :eek: :rolleyes: :p
Click to expand...
Lol shame, it seems you have hit a dead end at trying to be original. Poor mushy trolls. I guess by your logic it makes me a troll if I engage in people that have no intereset in actually discussing junk DNA. I don't know what you are actually doing here, my guess is you are trying to get me to insult you by telling you that you are dumb or something. Sorry, I won't stoop to your level.
 
This has all been very interesting. And continues to be so. Perhaps not in the way you intended but we all know what I think about your intentions.
 
Phronesis said:
Lol shame, it seems you have hit a dead end at trying to be original. Poor mushy trolls. I guess by your logic it makes me a troll if I engage in people that have no intereset in actually discussing junk DNA. I don't know what you are actually doing here, my guess is you are trying to get me to insult you by telling you that you are dumb or something. Sorry, I won't stoop to your level.
Click to expand...

Well I am not sure what is worse really, calling someone dumb or a troll.

Neither affects me and neither has any bearing on reality as she is. Go figure eh? As to my level? You cannot reach that high even if you try.

My intentions are clear cut. I say what I think and I lay my opinions out there.

Unlike you, I have no hidden agenda or cowardly, sneaky intentions of slipping God into any gaps. I kinda admire the dumbass creatoards with respect to you - at least they are honest in their mindless drivel.
 
Phronesis said:
Well i tried to give some information regarding provisionally labeled junk DNA.
Click to expand...

Nice try, but no you weren't. You were trying unsuccessfully to trash* certain lines of atheist thinking, or at least some vocal atheists. Liar. AND plagiarist LOL! :eek::eek:

* Videlicet:

"Faulty worldview"??? WTF does that mean? Bebeh Jebus??

So, a few years ago, some were under the misguided notion that some streches of DNA are just letfover junk as a result of blind undirected processes. perhaps because of a faulty worldview...
Click to expand...

Unscientific twaddle:

Would science proceed better if one were to assume function and design
Click to expand...

Look who is the ignorant one here:

Guess this is another blow to those who used the "junk DNA" argument as an argument for bad design pffff. Any more arguments from ignorance from them?
Click to expand...

And so on...
 
cyghost said:
Well I am not sure what is worse really, calling someone dumb or a troll.

Neither affects me and neither has any bearing on reality as she is. Go figure eh? As to my level? You cannot reach that high even if you try.

My intentions are clear cut. I say what I think and I lay my opinions out there.

Unlike you, I have no hidden agenda or cowardly, sneaky intentions of slipping God into any gaps. I kinda admire the dumbass creatoards with respect to you - at least they are honest in their mindless drivel.
Click to expand...
It is just plain for all to see that you are not interested in the least to discuss anything related to the functions of provisionally labled junk DNA. That is trolling.
 
rwenzori said:
Nice try, but no you weren't. You were trying unsuccessfully to trash* certain lines of atheist thinking, or at least some vocal atheists. Liar. AND plagiarist LOL! :eek::eek:

* Videlicet:

"Faulty worldview"??? WTF does that mean? Bebeh Jebus??



Unscientific twaddle:



Look who is the ignorant one here:



And so on...
Click to expand...
Lol, I think it is safe to say that you are of ignorant large parts of the history of "junk DNA" and interpretations of the term. I am sure you are familiar with the work of Dawkins et al. That is a prime example for you.
 
Last edited:
In your opinion. I am discussing your behavior and way of posting among other things. I believe it to be relevant.

I thus reject your opinion as trash and will continue to post as I see fit.

Some parts of DNA has provisionally been labeled as junk DNA and for some of these, uses have been found. Now what?
 
Phronesis said:
Lol, I think it is safe to say that you are of ignorant large parts of the history of "junk DNA" and interpretations of the term. I am sure you are familiar with the work of Dawkins et al. That is a prime example for you.
Click to expand...

I see you do not deny the accusation as to your purpose. Honesty? At this late stage? Or maybe not.
 
Well carry on, post more interesting articles about the functions of these provisionally labeled junk DNA. Oh wait, you are not interested in that. Could you at least just sod off and stop trolling.
 
rwenzori said:
I see you do not deny the accusation as to your purpose. Honesty? At this late stage? Or maybe not.
Click to expand...
Ah, more false accusations. Is it my problem you are just flat out ignorant of large parts of the history of "junk DNA" and interpretations of the term? You seem to be unaware of how junk DNA was used to support certain world views. You then through a hissy fit when data is presented that challenges such a faulty view? Try reading again.
 
Phronesis said:
Well carry on, post more interesting articles about the functions of these provisionally labeled junk DNA. Oh wait, you are not interested in that.
Click to expand...
You're right I am not. That does not prohibit me from forming an opinion of your and other's posts or commenting as I see fit. Which is what I am doing.


Could you at least just sod off and stop trolling.
Click to expand...
There you go. Still doing it despite all my attempts to educate you.


a) I am not trolling - could you at least offer a definition for "trolling" as you understand it so I may see what the **** you are harping on about?

b) I will not sod off - I have every right to be here and to offer my opinion. These attempts at curbing my freedom of speech remains disturbing.

Having established these two facts can we refrain from ever refering to it again?
 
cyghost said:
You're right I am not. That does not prohibit me from forming an opinion of your and other's posts or commenting as I see fit. Which is what I am doing
Click to expand...
Hey, if you can't post anything scientific in the science section so be it. but ppuhlease just troll somewhere else.
 
Other than cut and paste works, you hardly ever post 'anything scientific' yourself. Pot meet kettle. :rolleyes:


So that definition of troll is not forthcoming eh? I'd like something to work with. Because I am getting tired of telling you I am not a troll and perhaps I am wrong and 'troll' in phrony land means "someone who contributes on a public discussion forum and offers his or her opinion on relevant matters and what others are saying" and am I wrong in thinking you are continuously insulting me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X