Review: Aqara Presence Detector - Inconsistent Performance and Practical Challenges"

Ma’bad

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2016
Messages
492
Reaction score
147
This is my review of the Aqara Presence Detector, designed to monitor activity in a designated area. Unlike PIR sensors that rely on temperature changes, this device detects the presence of individuals. In addition PIR sensors, ceases to detect you when movement stops, such as when sitting still in a room.

Packaging: The device comes in sleek packaging reminiscent of Apple products, though it lacks a plug and includes a USB cable and wall mounts. No plug is included. Setting it up via the Aqara app is straightforward. However, its reliance on a power cord limits its placement options to areas with plug sockets, potentially compromising ideal positioning. Additionally, the recommended 2m height for installation results in visible cables, detracting from aesthetics.

My Experience: Installed in an open-plan lounge and kitchen, I encountered inconsistent performance, particularly in detecting multiple individuals. False positives(“interference”) triggered by air conditioners, plants, and other objects led to erroneous automation responses. Conversely, it sometimes failed to register a person's presence altogether. These inconsistencies are increased when there are more people in the room.
These inconsistencies prompted me to return the product.

While theoretically promising for automating tasks based on occupancy, my practical experience revealed too many inaccuracies, ultimately leading to the product's return.
 
Well, interesting. Your experience, is the complete opposite from the following article:

I concur; the reviews unanimously highlight the sensor's exceptional performance.

This review that I link below is the closest to my experience:

 
Any anomalies to your setup?

Bright sunlight on the sensor maybe or high heat from an oven or other source?
 
Any anomalies to your setup?

Bright sunlight on the sensor maybe or high heat from an oven or other source?
There were several sources of interference affecting the presence sensor, including a plant, an oven, a microwave, and an air conditioner. I wasn't aware that these common household items could cause interference before I bought the sensor. The problem is, if you designate an area as an 'interference zone', it essentially becomes a dead zone where the sensor doesn't detect anything.
 
There were several sources of interference affecting the presence sensor, including a plant, an oven, a microwave, and an air conditioner. I wasn't aware that these common household items could cause interference before I bought the sensor. The problem is, if you designate an area as an 'interference zone', it essentially becomes a dead zone where the sensor doesn't detect anything.

And where was it places in relation to these items?
 
And where was it places in relation to these items?
I have an open-plan kitchen and living room. The sensor was located in the lounge area, with the kitchen about 2 to 3 meters away, with the appliances.
One of the reasons for installing the sensor was to illuminate specific areas of the kitchen when they were in use. Additionally, the sensor was intended to turn off all the lights when absent presence was detected.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X