Hope this is in the right section.
Basically moved into new place in Jan. Discovered roof leaks which made a big puddle on my ceiling a week before the big storms in KZN. Insurance said they’re not covering it because the batons are not maintained and that it’s my cost. They will cover the ceiling damage though as long as I repair the roof.
Called previous owner to say wtf and he said he didn’t know about it. Agent went on the defensive and attorney used the voetstoets clause to chase me away.
I got a few people to come out to get me quotes (they’re quite busy as you can imagine so I have to wait for my slots). Guy comes out today and while walking on the roof falls through (he’s ok) leaving a hole in my roof which his company fixed but not the damage to my home as a result.
What is evident on this portion is that there isn’t even any sheeting between the tiles and the beams and the roof guys are obviously loving this from a costing perspective.
I’m hoping that somebody can advise me as to how do I proceed from here. My questions are:
1. Do I have any recourse on the previous owner for not disclosing such things or can he just hide away behind “he didn’t know” and the voetstoets clause? Roof guy mentioned something about a cooling off period but wasn’t clear.
2. The damage that the roof guy did should come out of their pocket to repair right?
Basically moved into new place in Jan. Discovered roof leaks which made a big puddle on my ceiling a week before the big storms in KZN. Insurance said they’re not covering it because the batons are not maintained and that it’s my cost. They will cover the ceiling damage though as long as I repair the roof.
Called previous owner to say wtf and he said he didn’t know about it. Agent went on the defensive and attorney used the voetstoets clause to chase me away.
I got a few people to come out to get me quotes (they’re quite busy as you can imagine so I have to wait for my slots). Guy comes out today and while walking on the roof falls through (he’s ok) leaving a hole in my roof which his company fixed but not the damage to my home as a result.
What is evident on this portion is that there isn’t even any sheeting between the tiles and the beams and the roof guys are obviously loving this from a costing perspective.
I’m hoping that somebody can advise me as to how do I proceed from here. My questions are:
1. Do I have any recourse on the previous owner for not disclosing such things or can he just hide away behind “he didn’t know” and the voetstoets clause? Roof guy mentioned something about a cooling off period but wasn’t clear.
2. The damage that the roof guy did should come out of their pocket to repair right?