Rooibos protected in EU trade pact

LazyLion

King of de Jungle
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
107,592
Reaction score
10,236
Location
District 9
Rooibos tea has secured geographic indicator status in the long-awaited economic partnership agreement between southern African nations and the European Union, Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies said on Monday.

"It will be the rooibos tea manufacturers of South Africa which will have ownership of that particular name and that term will be applicable only to products that come from and are approved by us," he said.

Davies termed the designation significant, given the widespread popularity Rooibos had acquired in Europe in recent years.

Last year, the SA Rooibos Council hurriedly managed to stop an attempt by a French company -- the Compagnie de Trucy -- to trademark the name, fearing that it could secure exclusive use.

The same trademark protection given to rooibos will apply to honeybush, another tea grown exclusively in the Cape region, and Karoo lamb --meaning that only products produced in those areas can be marketed under those trade names.

In turn South Africa was forced to make a concession on feta cheese, which has been a so-called protected designation of origin product in the European Union since 2002.

Davies said once the agreement was in place, existing local producers would be allowed to continue using the Greek name but new entrants into the market would be barred from doing so.

Geographic name protection has also been given to South African wines from a number of regions like Robertson, in the same manner that the French industry has trademarked its Bordeaux and Champagne domains.

Xavier Carim, deputy director-general for international trade, said Europe's motivation for protecting produce from a particular origin was essentially commercial and South Africa had realised that it too could secure higher prices for local produce under the same regime.

"We are beginning to see that there are benefits for our commercial farmers from specialised produce."

The trade pact will also see the volume of local wine that can be exported to Europe tariff-free every year increase from 47 million litres to 110 million litres.

Similarly, the EU has agreed that South Africa would be allowed to ship 150,000 tons of sugar to Europe tariff-free every year in what could prove a considerable boon for local producers given the higher going rate in Europe.

Carim told reporters: "Currently, South Africa is effectively excluded from the European Union for sugar exports... because of the very high tariffs that they apply.

"With 150,000 tonnes -- I expect South African producers can easily take out that -- the advantage of the EU market is that it is twice the price you get from the world market, so there is a benefit there.

He said the South African wines would become more price competitive in Europe because of the tariff removal on another 63 million tonnes annually, though Davies tempered expectations by saying the impact for the local industry would depend on demand in a still-depressed EU market.

Carim revealed that the issue of protected appellations had played a key role in unblocking the negotiations on the economic partnership agreement which first began in 2004 but soon stalled for several years.

"One of the critical turning points in the negotiations was our agreement to include geographic indications as part of an overall agreement.

"This had been a long-standing demand of the EU and when we agreed that we would pursue a discussion on the basis of certain very clear principles, the negotiations started to move more constructively."

The deal was initialled in Pretoria last week.

Davies said the timing was significant because of the deadline of October 1 when Botswana, Namibia and Swaziland would have lost their preferential access to the EU market for beef, sugar and fish -- on which their economies depended heavily.

He said he was satisfied that South Africa had achieved its twin goals of maintaining a common external tariff for the Southern African Customs Union for EU products, and improving South Africa's access to the EU market beyond the terms of the existing trade and co-operation pact.


Source : Sapa /ef/fg/lp/ks
Date : 21 Jul 2014 18:46
 
This is great news for South Africa & the Rooibos Industry as a whole in SA.
 
Good, I love my Rooibos!

Can they call it redbush? :D
 
Glad to hear!

Only rooibos I find out here is mixed in with other teas. Yuck.

Thank goodness for familial care packages :love:
 
Oh dear. Now we get the bureaucrats in Brussels to extend their loopy legalism to locals. This craziness can't go on forever, I hope.
 
Oh dear. Now we get the bureaucrats in Brussels to extend their loopy legalism to locals. This craziness can't go on forever, I hope.

This isn't craziness, and is well supported by most in the EU, it gives geographic products protection across the EU (and to those who want to do business with the EU). Things like Champagne have had protection for a long time, along with things like cheddar cheese and recently Cornish pasties.

For example, a winery can't make champagne in China and try and sell it as such, and why should they be able to?

Though the Rooibos thing, it might be a bit late, most of the Rooibos in the UK at least is marketed as Redbush, it's not common to see it packaged as Rooibos (perhaps the protection will also apply to "Redbush"), but it is becoming popular so the SA farmers should already be seeing demand going up.
 
Last edited:
I know all that. I deeply disagree with it. Sooner or later this whole geographism must collapse. There oughtn't be these sorts of artificial legal restrictions on trade. If I produce rooibos tea on my farm in Cameroon or Columbia I should be free to call what I wish and sell it to whom I please, without Caesar's let or leave. My objection is philosophical.
 
Last edited:
I know all that. I deeply disagree with it. Sooner or later this whole geographism must collapse. There oughtn't be these sorts of artificial legal restrictions on trade. If I produce rooibos tea on my farm in Cameroon or Columbia I should be free to call what I wish and sell it to whom I please, without Caesar's let or leave. My objection is philosophical.

You can, but then you just can't do business with the EU, who have decided that Rooibos needs to be grown in it's original home region if it's to be sold in the EU as Rooibos tea. How can Rooibos made in Cameroon be the same as Rooibos grown in the Cape? Or cheddar cheese from Columbia? Different climate, different soil, different ingredients.

The EU is right with this one, and it won't be changing anytime soon, it has universal support right across the continent.
 
You can, but then you just can't do business with the EU, who have decided that Rooibos needs to be grown in it's original home region if it's to be sold in the EU as Rooibos tea. How can Rooibos made in Cameroon be the same as Rooibos grown in the Cape? Or cheddar cheese from Columbia? Different climate, different soil, different ingredients.

The EU is right with this one, and it won't be changing anytime soon, it has universal support right across the continent.

True. Same goes for feta (among other things). Unless it's produced in Greece it can't be traded in the EU under the name of "feta" though it's common to see it sold under numerous other names, such as "salad cheese."

And of course it has support--consumers are happy to know that what they're purchasing is authentic and traders/countries are happy to know that their product name and its geographic authenticity are protected.

I can't imagine any rational reason to disagree with this. Consumers have the freedom to choose "the same" product with a different name and foreign traders can produce "the same" product with a different name if they so wish.
 
True. Same goes for feta (among other things). Unless it's produced in Greece it can't be traded in the EU under the name of "feta" though it's common to see it sold under numerous other names, such as "salad cheese."

And of course it has support--consumers are happy to know that what they're purchasing is authentic and traders/countries are happy to know that their product name and its geographic authenticity are protected.

I can't imagine any rational reason to disagree with this. Consumers have the freedom to choose "the same" product with a different name and foreign traders can produce "the same" product with a different name if they so wish.

Which one is the soft feta again? Is it the Danish feta? It is creamy and melts in your mouth. I completely over dosed on it the one night. Got a block of it as a take away from a restaurant and ate the damn thing. I was green for hours ..... but the suffering was worth it. :D

I am happy this came through. If we cant call our sparkling wine Champagne, then why should they get to call their Rooibos, "Rooibos"

I have to admit though, I was under the impression that Rooibos can actually only be grown on the West Coast. I think Clanwilliam is a big Rooibos producing area.

I do love my Rooibos. Only tea I enjoy. Dont give me that English breakfast sh*t. Disgusting! bleh.
 
Which one is the soft feta again? Is it the Danish feta? It is creamy and melts in your mouth. I completely over dosed on it the one night. Got a block of it as a take away from a restaurant and ate the damn thing. I was green for hours ..... but the suffering was worth it. :D

There is no such thing as Danish feta :whistle:

Those would be "salat tern" also known and translated simply as "salad cubes" which, I don't think, are exclusively Danish :p

I have a thing for goats' cheese feta (which, I know, isn't REALLY feta because "REAL" feta is made with sheep's cheese, but whatever). I love goats cheese :o

I do love my Rooibos. Only tea I enjoy. Dont give me that English breakfast sh*t. Disgusting! bleh.

I love pretty much all teas. But Rooibos is undoubtedly my favourite. Especially with honey. And milk. Because civilised. /pinky
 
There is no such thing as Danish feta :whistle:

Those would be "salat tern" also known and translated simply as "salad cubes" which, I don't think, are exclusively Danish :p

I have a thing for goats' cheese feta (which, I know, isn't REALLY feta because "REAL" feta is made with sheep's cheese, but whatever). I love goats cheese :o



I love pretty much all teas. But Rooibos is undoubtedly my favourite. Especially with honey. And milk. Because civilised. /pinky

Well, all I know is it is that very soft feta that does not crumble and it melts in your mouth. Oh my gosh .... my mouth waters just thinking about it. I have never had cheese made from anything other than cow milk.....that I am aware of anyway.
 
Well, all I know is it is that very soft feta that does not crumble and it melts in your mouth. Oh my gosh .... my mouth waters just thinking about it. I have never had cheese made from anything other than cow milk.....that I am aware of anyway.

Liez! :whistle:
 
Well, all I know is it is that very soft feta that does not crumble and it melts in your mouth. Oh my gosh .... my mouth waters just thinking about it. I have never had cheese made from anything other than cow milk.....that I am aware of anyway.

I'd send you some if it would survive the trip :p

You'll just have to come visit ;)
 
I'd send you some if it would survive the trip :p

You'll just have to come visit ;)

I would love to visit Sweden one day. Would love to see Scandinavia and Alaska, but more Scandinavia.

Ja, dont think it would. Besides, sent a bottle of wine to my ex in UK, and it has gone missing in the mail. Fcking SAPO! :mad:
 
All products should have the country of origin printed on the label. Especially meats, veg, etc. Then they can grow it wherever and call it whatever.
 
True. Same goes for feta (among other things). Unless it's produced in Greece it can't be traded in the EU under the name of "feta" though it's common to see it sold under numerous other names, such as "salad cheese."

And of course it has support--consumers are happy to know that what they're purchasing is authentic and traders/countries are happy to know that their product name and its geographic authenticity are protected.

I can't imagine any rational reason to disagree with this. Consumers have the freedom to choose "the same" product with a different name and foreign traders can produce "the same" product with a different name if they so wish.

Because he has a problem with anything "the man" says he must or mustn't do. Maybe he wants anarchy but I cant say for sure.
 
You can, but then you just can't do business with the EU, who have decided that Rooibos needs to be grown in it's original home region if it's to be sold in the EU as Rooibos tea. How can Rooibos made in Cameroon be the same as Rooibos grown in the Cape? Or cheddar cheese from Columbia? Different climate, different soil, different ingredients.

The EU is right with this one, and it won't be changing anytime soon, it has universal support right across the continent.
What on earth has the name of a food got to do with Caesar? And why involve the police if an Italian wine merchant wishes to sell port called "Port" from South Africa, for example? Oh, I know the arguments - had a big one with the Portuguese ambassador over port (he gave me one of their ports, and I gave him one of ours) - but I deeply disagree. This bureaucratism eventually morphs into tyranny.
 
What on earth has the name of a food got to do with Caesar? And why involve the police if an Italian wine merchant wishes to sell port called "Port" from South Africa, for example? Oh, I know the arguments - had a big one with the Portuguese ambassador over port (he gave me one of their ports, and I gave him one of ours) - but I deeply disagree. This bureaucratism eventually morphs into tyranny.

Because its has value? Because maybe the people who are in that region producing said item asked for it? Should "the man" aka Ceasar just ignore their request?
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X