Router : Asking too much?

I would very definitely suggest the TP-Link combo...

I'm running a 1043 Gigabit Switch with Wireless N... and an 8840T ADSL modem.... thing is rock solid, looks good and with the DD-WRT firmware on the 1043ND I can do everything I need to and a WHOLE lot more...
 
Look how pretty this is - probably costs a small fortune though :/

How much are the TP devices you guys chat about?

E4200_Photo01.jpg
 
Look how pretty this is - probably costs a small fortune though :/

How much are the TP devices you guys chat about?
R500 to R800, depending which one you go for.

Dont blow too much money on a crazy expensive router(around R2000) now. Within 12 months the new wireless standard (802.11ac) will be ubiquitous and wifi n will be old news.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11ac
 
Last edited:
Speak for yourself. :|

I don't understand? Every time myself or clients have needed support, D-Link local techs have been available 08h00 - 22h00 Mon - Fri a phone call away. Commendable, surely? What other PC/networking company offers this?
 
How long did it take for 'N' to appear?
There is a lot more cooperation between companies this time. They have all said they dont want what happened with draft n to happen again. There were already quite a few new 802.11ac routers shown at CES.

My point is he shouldn't break the bank on something which appears slightly prettier/better now but will be rubbish in a year. He is far better off going with a solid cheaper option now. The tp-link range is just fine. Their stuff is extremely solid.

A cheap modem + gigbit switch + cheap wifi n access point(upgraded to 802.11ac in a year) is the smartest option if you are willing to put the effort in. Those fancy combined routers are often not the best option.
 
Last edited:
You will not see ubiquitous 802.11ac adoption for at least another 24 - 36 months... the standard hasn't even been ratified yet (thats another 6 - 12months away at least)
 
You will not see ubiquitous 802.11ac adoption for at least another 24 - 36 months... the standard hasn't even been ratified yet (thats another 6 - 12months away at least)

Itll take awhile for it to filter down to cellphone sized devices, but itll happen fairly quick in higher end routers and the like. Broadcom have already announced a whole family of chips. But yes, ubiquity at 12 months was a bit ridiculous.

Either way, i wouldnt spend too much on a router now. The tplink 1048 you suggested is just about perfect i would say. Spending double that at the moment just doesnt seem worth it.
 
Last edited:
Itll take awhile for it to filter down to cellphone sized devices, but itll happen fairly quick in higher end routers and the like. Broadcom have already announced a whole family of chips. But yes, ubiquity at 12 months was a bit ridiculous.

Either way, i wouldnt spend too much on a router now. The tplink 1048 you suggested is just about perfect i would say. Spending double that at the moment just doesnt seem worth it.

Apart from bragging rights, why do you need more than 300Mbps (theoretical) anyway?
 
Apart from bragging rights, why do you need more than 300Mbps (theoretical) anyway?
For copying large files over the network...

If I got 30MB/s over wireless, I would be VERY VERY happy! Even 10MB/s average over wireless would be quite satisfying. I only get 10MB/s if I place my laptop like in 50cm away from the WiFi AP.

Currently I get about 3MB/s (over 802.11n) with my laptop, that isn't even 10m away from the WiFi AP.
 
For copying large files over the network...

If I got 30MB/s over wireless, I would be VERY VERY happy! Even 10MB/s average over wireless would be quite satisfying. I only get 10MB/s if I place my laptop like in 50cm away from the WiFi AP.

Currently I get about 3MB/s (over 802.11n) with my laptop, that isn't even 10m away from the WiFi AP.

Yeah, doing large backups or moving HD movies around is still quite unpleasant with N. Hopefully AC improves things a bit, wires are not always practical.
 
Thanks Speedster.

I'll try some of those things, but I highly doubt that I'll be able to boost my average download speed from 3MB/s to like 9MB/s by performing those things mentioned in that article, since I'm already complying with most of it.
 
Thanks Speedster.

I'll try some of those things, but I highly doubt that I'll be able to boost my average download speed from 3MB/s to like 9MB/s by performing those things mentioned in that article, since I'm already complying with most of it.

Then you can't be running 802.11n... My laptop/tablet or phone can be over 40m from my AP and I can easily get 20MB/s transfers on my network... spikes MUCH higher when i'm closers
 
I now boosted my speed from 3MB/s to about 5MB/s average by simply doing the opposite of that guide: by changing the channel bandwidth from 20MHz to 40MHz.

Besides that, the TX + RX Antenna chains made a big difference too. Like when I played around with it, I decreased my average download speed to like 1.5MB/s when I had only 1 antenna for RX. At the moment I have it as TX = 1+2, RX = 1 + 3

Lastly, I have been using WPA2 personal + AES encryption all along.

Edit:
Oh, and with my Buffalo WiFi AP, the direction of the antenna's also plays a VERY big role. Like if I tilt them sideways, my connection speed drops from 130Mbps to 26Mbps.
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X