Agent67
Honorary Master
Militias are also unconstitutional according to Chapter 13, section 199, subsections 1 and 3.Don't worry, Champo will spin this to the end of days that there's nothing wrong. But just wait until AfriForum does the same...
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Militias are also unconstitutional according to Chapter 13, section 199, subsections 1 and 3.Don't worry, Champo will spin this to the end of days that there's nothing wrong. But just wait until AfriForum does the same...
For the third time Mustafa, which law did the EFF break and government just sat and did nothing?Militias are also unconstitutional according to Chapter 13, section 199, subsections 1 and 3.
If you read the book, you'd get what Gogo is saying and ask how come the Afrikaners could manage to gather and get building, but...![]()
The Afrikaners: A Concise History
Hermann Giliomee, top historian, is seen as the world e…www.goodreads.com
Read this. Unbiased, easy-to-read history of the Afrikaners.
Yes, Afrikaners started to build financial institutions, etc, pre-Apartheid when the Brits still tightly controlled everything, incl. the economy.
So let's go with that for a minute, if they were that good why did the need apartheid?If you read the book, you'd get what Gogo is saying and ask how come the Afrikaners could manage to gather and get building, but...
While since 1994, we've yet to see such successful initiatives by the Black community, except maybe African Bank (is the first that comes to mind, ready for more examples)?
Good question. The way I see it, fear of others and good ol' racism and prejudice won the day. Hence, the creation of apartheid.So let's go with that for a minute, if they were that good why did the need apartheid?
The fear of course based on Swart Gevaar, and I also think in some lesser capacity, the aftermath of the brutality of the Anglo-Boer War (or Second Freedom War or whatever they call it now).fear of others
This guy is a known rubble-rouser. These guys usually work as marshalls at EFF events.
Only in SA do political parties proudly declare that they're building militias and the gov does nothing.
It's like having a football match and taking all your opportunities, while the opposing team is safely locked away in the dressing room, a very odd definition of taking your opportunities.Good question. The way I see it, fear of others and good ol' racism and prejudice won the day. Hence, the creation of apartheid.
If you read the book I linked you to, it also mentions that Apartheid as a policy had its beginnings in the NG Kerk in the early 1900s (this was when they became a vassal for the NP)
Must have been very awkward for McPherson.
Naspers, Sanlam, Volkskas (now part of ABSA) and Santam were created and were successful way before Apartheid started.It's like having a football match and taking all your opportunities, while the opposing team is safely locked away in the dressing room, a very odd definition of taking your opportunities.
Probably what Zille meant when she said colonialism wasn't so bad.Naspers, Sanlam, Volkskas (now part of ABSA) and Santam were created and were successful way before Apartheid started.
Rembrandt, you could make the argument was helped by the regime.
Not what she said, but ok.Probably what Zille meant when she said colonialism wasn't so bad.
Naspers, Sanlam, Volkskas (now part of ABSA) and Santam were created and were successful way before Apartheid started.
No, it's just they they did not loot their own banks, nor stripped their companies of assets!Probably what Zille meant when she said colonialism wasn't so bad.
Meh, degrees.No, it's just they they did not loot their own banks, nor stripped their companies of assets!
It's like having a football match and taking all your opportunities, while the opposing team is safely locked away in the dressing room, a very odd definition of taking your opportunities.
Failed to come out in clear support...
Thoughts?
Also, the DA is having to do this because Macpherson is a complete twit saying that 'nil compensation is a form of compensation'.
Acknowledging that secure private property rights under the rule of law are essential to fixed investment, economic growth, job creation, and better living standards for the people of South Africa, the Democratic Alliance (DA):
(1) Supports section 25 of The Constitution of South Africa.
(2) Asserts our support that compensation must be just and equitable, as adjudicated by a court of law, in cases of expropriation in terms of the Constitution;
(3) Rejects the notion of ‘nil compensation’ as established by the Expropriation Act, 2024 as well as the limitations placed by the Act on rights of private property owners in contesting the terms of expropriation in court; and
(4) Supports the existing efforts of the DA to take the Expropriation Act, 2024 on judicial review and explore every other opportunity to render the Act less of a risk to private property rights.
The DA continues in our court case challenging the constitutionality of the Expropriation Act in the High Court.