SA Politics Thread Part 12

Status
Not open for further replies.
As with any system mistakes sometimes happen and need to be rectified. There's normally a process involved and someone with delegated authority will make the correction. While the change is made on the system itself, the audit trail which captures everything done on the system will have date, time, user details as well as what was changed. Of course there must always be paperwork for back up. But something tells me in this case there is no paperwork because there was no mistake to correct. Just some minor bright spark acting on instructions from a bigger bright spark

That shouldn't just be accessible or possible to anyone in the police? It should in fact require multiple sign offs, where its very specific who is doing the signing off, the fact that they dont have a name is very concerning.
 
That shouldn't just be accessible or possible to anyone in the police? It should in fact require multiple sign offs, where its very specific who is doing the signing off, the fact that they dont have a name is very concerning.

No it wouldn't be. Only someone with delegated authority would have access to those transactions. What makes you think they don't have a name? The audit trail would indicate the user number and then the name is just one simple query away.

In the normal course of events there would be a large paper-trail. With supporting documents, authorisations etc. In this instance there will be fokoli because it wasn't a legitimate transaction. Someone didn't expect the other side to go snooping on the audit trails
 
No it wouldn't be. Only someone with delegated authority would have access to those transactions. What makes you think they don't have a name? The audit trail would indicate the user number and then the name is just one simple query away.

In the normal course of events there would be a large paper-trail. With supporting documents, authorisations etc.

I didnt see them mention that they knew who it was? I would think that if they have a name they would say so rather than just say that they know the time and date it was done.

In this instance there will be fokoli because it wasn't a legitimate transaction. Someone didn't expect the other side to go snooping on the audit trails

Thats exactly the problem though, it simply shouldnt be possible, otherwise how many of these types of cases will never be picked up? Only this one because its high profile.
 
As with any system mistakes sometimes happen and need to be rectified. There's normally a process involved and someone with delegated authority will make the correction. While the change is made on the system itself, the audit trail which captures everything done on the system will have date, time, user details as well as what was changed. Of course there must always be paperwork for back up. But something tells me in this case there is no paperwork because there was no mistake to correct. Just some minor bright spark acting on instructions from a bigger bright spark

On the whiteboard, with a dozen eyes on it to make sure those passwords aren't stolen.

1000_F_309613658_KnTDlyFjkYwShCWVCxGMHFU91ImedOeo.jpg
 
I hope we do and I hope it goes to Johannesburg.


So that we can show the world this?

ec1f294e6d8742aa89545eff9a934d78.jpg


3qDsyOkN3osEN7LL15vxxUZPh7Dm1EoGqhhA-sP7GXnVp3iAuljVDGiKQFp38YFcndH-bZnaDHSW55Bl9kAftd8=s1000
 
That shouldn't just be accessible or possible to anyone in the police? It should in fact require multiple sign offs, where its very specific who is doing the signing off, the fact that they dont have a name is very concerning.

Police should have read only access to criminal records. Only an appointed official from the justice department should be allowed entry and changes with a paper trail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X