SA professor warns against drone, robot attacks

I'm afraid it'5 pr0bably a bit late f0r this discussi0n...if indeed it was ever t0 be under discussi0n.
 
but human involvement should never be replaced by machines

They said that about manufacturing 40 years ago.
Autopilots 30 years ago.
Cars 5 years ago.

Important argument, but the professor should also instruct the journalists to go and read their Asimovs.
 
The problem is that the robot designers won't pay any attention to this.

Yep. Asimov's laws are built around the concept of robots doing fairly peaceful tasks. Current development is driven from an armed forces perspective - enforcing Asimov's laws to DARPA just isn't going to happen.
 
“Can they really make the distinction between legitimate targets and civilians? Can they distinguish a hunter from an enemy combatant?”

Can humans?
 
Why? What's so special about Asimov?


Not just the three laws, but the influence of robots in general. Asimov (and other scifi writers) introduced the questions decades ago already. Anyone who thinks about the issues, or report on them, should get up to speed with the thinking. If not, we just keep thinking in circles, because everyone has to consider the problem from scratch and in isolation. This is not much different to philosophy or economics or politics really. Scifi is science and technology's version of philosophy (and more fun to read, because it is stories.)
 
Not just the three laws, but the influence of robots in general. Asimov (and other scifi writers) introduced the questions decades ago already. Anyone who thinks about the issues, or report on them, should get up to speed with the thinking. If not, we just keep thinking in circles, because everyone has to consider the problem from scratch and in isolation.

Totally, see "the issues with self-driving cars" in 'Sally', published in 1953:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sally_(short_story)

http://io9.com/why-asimovs-three-laws-of-robotics-cant-protect-us-1553665410
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X