Sa Sucks closing down on Friday.

This is a natural consequence, which I recognised immediately in our own family.

Some are resigned to the fact that the country is going down the tubes (TIA), others have left or are planning to and some have gone quite right wing. The rest - well they've been shot, killed or both.

but there is plenty of great and decent white people. the poor don't affect me directly because they have their own lives, and i'm sorry for them sure. but when i go out to a party with my black friends, and a white guy walks past and calls them a k****r for a no reason it starts affecting me, so when i find websites like this and find that they ENCOURAGE it i get terribly angry.

start changing the few racists you can and leave the hard work to the government, coz no matter how much we post comments or whine about this country, we can only change ourselves and how we affect other people. how hard is it to be a good person?
 
I think Zasucks' biggest pitfall was the fact that they did not maintain objectivity. Their mission statement was to expose the nasty truths about the new SA but the problem is that they allowed emotion to cloud their credibility. I think that's the fairest way to put it without having to drag in the 'r' word. Uhuru Guru, in his radio interview with Kieno Kammies, said that he allowed the site to act with a dual function by providing a platform for users to vent their frustrations. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion but in order to preserve credibility, moderation and pure objectivity has to be applied. In this way opposing parties can only argue the facts and not the sentiment/motivation of the blogger.

I wonder how many people are opposed to the outright racism on the site (openly declared by the bloggers on a regular basis, there's no denying it) or to the fact that the site painted SA in a negative light? My guess is that had zasucks been more objective, we would have a better idea.

Anyway, to all who watched last night's Carte Blanche, they ran an insert on Rudolph Zinn's findings on crime in SA. Funny enough, zasucks ran this article some months back. Carte Blanche however, ran a far more objective take on the fact that Zinn's findings suggest we should all be good, submissive victims; that we should not make eye contact with our attackers; that we should assume the submissibe "sleep" position; that we should point out all valuables in a calm, quiet fashion; etc. etc. etc...

And we wonder why people in this country are so angry and hateful. :rolleyes:
 
but there is plenty of great and decent white people. the poor don't affect me directly because they have their own lives, and i'm sorry for them sure. but when i go out to a party with my black friends, and a white guy walks past and calls them a k****r for a no reason it starts affecting me, so when i find websites like this and find that they ENCOURAGE it i get terribly angry.

start changing the few racists you can and leave the hard work to the government, coz no matter how much we post comments or whine about this country, we can only change ourselves and how we affect other people. how hard is it to be a good person?

so by your definition zasucks should have no effect since they are only whining about the country and the govermunt should change all the racists that we cannot turn?

so glad to know that the govermunt is perfect and racism free, that they can now change racism, would this be towards white racists only?

and govermunt laws ENCOURAGE racism ... but you cannot seem to see that ... shame :(

shew you had me worried their thought we where all bad, glad that you have found a plenty good white south africans ... for interest sake what is the criteria one must follow to be labeled a good white south african?
 
Anyway, to all who watched last night's Carte Blanche, they ran an insert on Rudolph Zinn's findings on crime in SA. Funny enough, zasucks ran this article some months back. Carte Blanche however, ran a far more objective take on the fact that Zinn's findings suggest we should all be good, submissive victims; that we should not make eye contact with our attackers; that we should assume the submissibe "sleep" position; that we should point out all valuables in a calm, quiet fashion; etc. etc. etc...

And we wonder why people in this country are so angry and hateful. :rolleyes:

Saw that, I think it should be discussed in a thread on it's own.
 
I think Zasucks' biggest pitfall was the fact that they did not maintain objectivity. Their mission statement was to expose the nasty truths about the new SA but the problem is that they allowed emotion to cloud their credibility. I think that's the fairest way to put it without having to drag in the 'r' word. Uhuru Guru, in his radio interview with Kieno Kammies, said that he allowed the site to act with a dual function by providing a platform for users to vent their frustrations. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion but in order to preserve credibility, moderation and pure objectivity has to be applied. In this way opposing parties can only argue the facts and not the sentiment/motivation of the blogger.

I wonder how many people are opposed to the outright racism on the site (openly declared by the bloggers on a regular basis, there's no denying it) or to the fact that the site painted SA in a negative light? My guess is that had zasucks been more objective, we would have a better idea.

Anyway, to all who watched last night's Carte Blanche, they ran an insert on Rudolph Zinn's findings on crime in SA. Funny enough, zasucks ran this article some months back. Carte Blanche however, ran a far more objective take on the fact that Zinn's findings suggest we should all be good, submissive victims; that we should not make eye contact with our attackers; that we should assume the submissibe "sleep" position; that we should point out all valuables in a calm, quiet fashion; etc. etc. etc...

And we wonder why people in this country are so angry and hateful. :rolleyes:
The replacement site seems a lot better. I was quite moved by the YouTube video of an armed robbery at a supermarket.
 
I'm sorry but i can't.I keep on checking on those that oppressed me and no matter how hard i look,i don't see any colour other that white.

Yet whites wants me and my other non white brothers to forgive and forget.

Most whites accepted that the apartheid policies where wrong. This was expressed in a referendum. Eventually politically parties where unbanned, politcal prisoners freed and an open election was held.

If you still feel the need to blame anyone who is white for what happened, even those white's born in South Africa after 1994, then you are a racist, because you attitude to white is not based on what happened during the apartheid years, its based on your racial prejudice. There is no difference between you and someone like HF Verwoed. You are both equally retarded and both on the wrong side of history.
 
I think Zasucks' biggest pitfall was the fact that they did not maintain objectivity. Their mission statement was to expose the nasty truths about the new SA but the problem is that they allowed emotion to cloud their credibility. I think that's the fairest way to put it without having to drag in the 'r' word. Uhuru Guru, in his radio interview with Kieno Kammies, said that he allowed the site to act with a dual function by providing a platform for users to vent their frustrations. Nothing wrong with that in my opinion but in order to preserve credibility, moderation and pure objectivity has to be applied. In this way opposing parties can only argue the facts and not the sentiment/motivation of the blogger.

I wonder how many people are opposed to the outright racism on the site (openly declared by the bloggers on a regular basis, there's no denying it) or to the fact that the site painted SA in a negative light? My guess is that had zasucks been more objective, we would have a better idea.

Anyway, to all who watched last night's Carte Blanche, they ran an insert on Rudolph Zinn's findings on crime in SA. Funny enough, zasucks ran this article some months back. Carte Blanche however, ran a far more objective take on the fact that Zinn's findings suggest we should all be good, submissive victims; that we should not make eye contact with our attackers; that we should assume the submissibe "sleep" position; that we should point out all valuables in a calm, quiet fashion; etc. etc. etc...

And we wonder why people in this country are so angry and hateful. :rolleyes:

that is all that it would have taken, but what else can you call people who put up pictures of dead and dying black children? how is showing a kid dying venting frustration? i think he got off far too lightly, managing to convince people it was satire when most of them hadn't seen pictures like that.

maybe they let emotion cloud their judgement. i always just thought you don't hurt good people, and it is a big reason i don't try and be rude to people i dont know, even if i'm in a foul mood. there are just ways of doing things, like with everything in life, you can resign without making a big thing of it, you can argue with your wife without making her cry. he chose to run his site that way and he is now being judged for it. there are no pros to it :(
 
Last edited:
Most whites accepted that the apartheid policies where wrong. This was expressed in a referendum. Eventually politically parties where unbanned, politcal prisoners freed and an open election was held.

If you still feel the need to blame anyone who is white for what happened, even those white's born in South Africa after 1994, then you are a racist, because you attitude to white is not based on what happened during the apartheid years, its based on your racial prejudice. There is no difference between you and someone like HF Verwoed. You are both equally retarded and both on the wrong side of history.

I think he's referring to the whites who regular zasucks/stormfront etc.
 
so by your definition zasucks should have no effect since they are only whining about the country and the govermunt should change all the racists that we cannot turn?

so glad to know that the govermunt is perfect and racism free, that they can now change racism, would this be towards white racists only?

and govermunt laws ENCOURAGE racism ... but you cannot seem to see that ... shame :(

shew you had me worried their thought we where all bad, glad that you have found a plenty good white south africans ... for interest sake what is the criteria one must follow to be labeled a good white south african?

they are spreading hate speech. again you're comparing what he did to his website to the government, which is what i'm trying to show you. the government isn't perfect and racist free. neither was his blog. it doesn't excuse the other.

that is a different topic, and we've discussed it enough. let's argue that the government DOES encourage racism, and the whole of south africa agrees and we're happy witht hat decision. now that we all agree, does it excuse this guy to be a racist too?

not just a good south african, but a GOOD HUMAN BEING would be able to use their brain, would be able to differentiate, would be able to not group people who didn't want to be grouped with other people, and would understand that there is more than just 2 sides to every issue and not force them on everybody.

other than that, having a good heart, sense of humour, wit, all those things are good :)
 
That was hectic, surprised they used it considering there wasn't a single white person in the video.

and we should applaud them and give them credit for it. we can't just be negative when they highlight a problem. it's just when they're unfairly biased that we have to criticise them. i'd have no problem wit the name, the posts or even the critcism if they toned down on the racism and allowed people other than just white people on the site
 
how many laws have you pushed forward and criminals have you arrested?

none they wont listen to me :( but i have bliksemed a few wanna be house breaking ****s, hit one with a 5kg dumbbell in the head, he must of had a hard head though since he tried to get up again :( had to wait only 12 minutes for the cops (benefits of living in a small white only town)

Originally Posted by smalltownskybut there is plenty of great and decent white people.

that is what you posted and then you changed it to
not just a good south african, but a GOOD HUMAN BEING

but since we agree to disagree ..
 
and we should applaud them and give them credit for it. we can't just be negative when they highlight a problem. it's just when they're unfairly biased that we have to criticise them. i'd have no problem wit the name, the posts or even the critcism if they toned down on the racism and allowed people other than just white people on the site

why should they? it is their site and they can decide who they want on it, same as the black journalist forum ...

if you dont like the site, don't visit and don't advertise their addy by discussing it with anybody ... out of sight ...out of mind - racism/tribalism/culturalism is alive and kicking in every country in the world ..it will never go away not even MJ could change this ;)
 
none they wont listen to me :( but i have bliksemed a few wanna be house breaking ****s, hit one with a 5kg dumbbell in the head, he must of had a hard head though since he tried to get up again :( had to wait only 12 minutes for the cops (benefits of living in a small white only town)



they deserved it :D and you have the right to defend yourself. you should have bliksemed him once more for luck :D

that is what you posted and then you changed it

i wrote "not just a good south african, but a GOOD HUMAN BEING", which is english for saying "not only a good white south african, but a good person over all" which indicated that not only good south africans had to adhere to it.

look, it's easy. black person 1 is a criminal and black person 2 isn't. starting a blog saying black person 1 AND black person 2 are nothing but vicious criminals is lying. do you understand that?
 
Last edited:
why should they? it is their site and they can decide who they want on it, same as the black journalist forum ...

if you dont like the site, don't visit and don't advertise their addy by discussing it with anybody ... out of sight ...out of mind - racism/tribalism/culturalism is alive and kicking in every country in the world ..it will never go away not even MJ could change this ;)

then you might as well say "this is the ANC's country, they can decide if they want BEE or not.

if you don't like the country, don't stay in it. don't advertise it by criticising it. "

do you see how that works?

pedophilia is alive and kicking, do we tolerate that? religion is alive and kicking, do we accept something just because some crazy person comes and tells us the world is ending? there are rational and irrational things, and as far as irrational things go racism is one of them. you don't HAVE to be around people of another race, it's completely yoru decision, but you don't HAVE to work in a country with BEE either. you can't just avoid something. do you see ANY benefits to racism or limiting things to one race?

and this:

why should they? it is their site and they can decide who they want on it, same as the black journalist forum ...

sounds very much like the white only beaches idea they had during apartheid. what is so terrible about having a person of another race's opinion?
 
Last edited:
Forgiveness

I'm sorry but i can't.I keep on checking on those that oppressed me and no matter how hard i look,i don't see any colour other that white.
Yet whites wants me and my other non white brothers to forgive and forget.

It IS the Right thing to do :D

May I appologise on behalf of all those cretins imbeciles & idiots :(

EVERY single human being must be treated with respect and dignity.

( Note I did NOT include murderers , rapists , child molesters , animal abusers etc etc )

I start off with everyone with the same basic bundle of respect dignity and manners

It is up to THEM whether I subtract from , or add to , the bundle.


MW
 
then you might as well say "this is the ANC's country, they can decide if they want BEE or not.

if you don't like the country, don't stay in it. don't advertise it by criticising it. "

do you see how that works? ....

sounds very much like the white only beaches idea they had during apartheid. what is so terrible about having a person of another race's opinion?

if you owned the site then you can have who you want on it, you should start a rainbow nation blog if you feel so strongly about it ;)

no it would stand to reason that if you are a racist then you don't care about the other race's opinion ... not so?

and yes this is the anc's country and they have decided to have BEE , and that will not change - silly referendum voters though with emotion and not their brain's when they handed the country over to inexperienced people who have never governed anything ... wonder if you hit the rewind button how many of those voters would still vote the same ... but that is besides the point.

so by your reasoning we may not be critical towards the govermunt? you are joking right? , (and you had best not critise anything again on this forum, or your words will come back to bite you in the ass) ;)

this one race utopia that you seem to believe in will never happen, not here ... not anywhere but if you feel so strongly against racism start a anti - racism movement .. and see how long it takes before the different races in said movement start to turn on each other.
 
Forgiveness -2

look, it's easy. black person 1 is a criminal and black person 2 isn't. starting a blog saying black person 1 AND black person 2 are nothing but vicious criminals is lying. do you understand that?

99% of the Black people I meet are courteous and friendly --
but then I am genuinely interested in Black history and culture --
"Social Anthropology"
although I do not have a Masters in that subject like the Juluka man --
who is actually a Jew. :D

MW
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X